If all the gay and paedophile clergymen

[OCA]

What? Your last post in this thread? You're wrong.

Bubba your view on this is so void of common sense has to be unfathomable. Why do you insist on apologizing for homosexuals and or homosexual pedophiles/why apologize for the choices they made when in your heart of hearts you know they are wrong?

[darin]

What? Your last post in this thread? You're wrong.

Now you must be joking. Seriously.

Gay/Homosexual = Has sex with members of the same sex.

Gay/Homosexual Pedophile = sex with CHILDREN of the same sex.

Heterosexual Pedophile = sex with children of the OPPOSITE Sex.


2+2=4

[The ClayTaurus]

This is quite possibly the stupidest debate re: homosexuality that's out there.

[OCA]

This is quite possibly the stupidest debate re: homosexuality that's out there.

Why is that?

[The ClayTaurus]

Why is that?

Why give a shit? Are their ranks within pedophilia? Is raping a boy worse than raping a girl? You're splitting hairs about the lowest form of people on earth. Fuck 'em all.

[OCA]

Why give a shit? Are their ranks within pedophilia? Is raping a boy worse than raping a girl? You're splitting hairs about the lowest form of people on earth. Fuck 'em all.

Well no, its not worse, both are reprehensible but a man raping a boy is by definition "gay pedophilia", that is the point that is being argued.

[darin]

Why give a shit? Are their ranks within pedophilia? Is raping a boy worse than raping a girl? You're splitting hairs about the lowest form of people on earth. Fuck 'em all.

I think a man raping a boy is worse, if I were forced to classify both acts.

[5stringJeff]

Literally engaging in homosexual behavior, yes. But not by necessarily gay men. Pedophilia's its own ballgame.

As Forrest Gump would say if he were here, gay is as gay does. Participating in homosexual acts is waht defines one as "gay." Participating in pedophiliac (?) acts makes one a pedophile.

[The ClayTaurus]

Well no, its not worse, both are reprehensible but a man raping a boy is by definition "gay pedophilia", that is the point that is being argued.

And whether or not you're correct is a stupid debate. That's my point that I'm arguing

[The ClayTaurus]

I think a man raping a boy is worse, if I were forced to classify both acts.

I'm not forcing.

[darin]

I'm not forcing myself on you

Tease.

[OCA]

And whether or not you're correct is a stupid debate. That's my point that I'm arguing

Ok, noted.

[Bubbalicious]

Bubba your view on this is so void of common sense has to be unfathomable. Why do you insist on apologizing for homosexuals and or homosexual pedophiles/why apologize for the choices they made when in your heart of hearts you know they are wrong?

You're making some awfully big assumptions about me there.
I know in my heart of hearts and in my brain of brains that homosexuality's a normal part of life and has no correlation with pedophilia. I read stuff. Credible stuff. Stuff that's unaffiliated with any religious movement. And I know lots of gay people personally. They're just people.

[Bubbalicious]

I think a man raping a boy is worse, if I were forced to classify both acts.

Now YOU'VE got to be kidding me.

[darin]

Now YOU'VE got to be kidding me.

It's quite clear - both acts are horrible. But if one was to prioritize, a Man raping a boy would probably be worse. (shrug). From a mental aspect, both are pretty jacked up; have the potential to REALLY mess up a kid. The 'kicker' is the likelihood of PHYSICAL damage to the boy; it's probably GREATER because the anus was NEVER created to receive such trauma.

If Homosexuals got OUT of the priesthood, the likelihood of a boy getting molested/raped by a priest would drop a LOT. Of course, not that EVERY gay man is a pedophile - I believe it's a percentage for sure however.