Emails show close Clinton allies in dark, shocked over ‘insane’ server setup

[red states rule]

Why this does not matter to the "journalists" covering the election, or those supporting Hillary - shows how low the left has sunk

ome of Hillary Clinton’s top advisers were in the dark about the scope and depth of her controversial email system as the scandal broke in March 2015, with even her now-campaign manager professing ignorance about the private system at the time, according to emails released Thursday by WikiLeaks.
One close ally, Center for American Progress leader Neera Tanden, was still fuming months later, pressing now-Campaign Chairman John Podesta on who gave Clinton permission to use the system.
"Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered?" Tanden wrote in July. “Like whole thing is f---ing insane.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...ver-setup.html

[Kathianne]

Why this does not matter to the "journalists" covering the election, or those supporting Hillary - shows how low the left has sunk

Check out: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...tanden&tbm=nws

CNN
WaPo
Tribune
WSJ

The list goes on. They are covering the emails/Wikileaks, but the real stories will come after the election. It's still causing Hillary problems, but likely not enough to change the election.

[red states rule]

You cannot make this stuff up

Yet Hillary backers pretend this (along many other things) never happened

Clinton lectured State Dept. staff on cybersecurity in 2010 video

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/22/clinton-lectured-state-dept-staff-on-cybersecurity-in-2010-video.html

[Elessar]

You cannot make this stuff up

Yet Hillary backers pretend this (along many other things) never happened

Clinton lectured State Dept. staff on cybersecurity in 2010 video

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...010-video.html

Ironic, isn't it?

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthre...Security-Month

[red states rule]

Since when does Hillary care about what she does VS what she does?