OCA's Trolling Thread

[Abbey Marie]

It is expressly illegal to go off topic in an anti-hillary or pro-trump thread. You were out that day.

Feel free to start another thread on Trump's accuser. It's expressly legal to do so. We are a very open and giving board that way.

[fj1200]

I don't like repeating myself, so last time for this: I quoted a FACT. If you don't like that FACT, or you think judicial appointees are apolitical, take it up with author. You are welcome for my highly observant reading of the article, though.

Where did I say it wasn't FACT? Attempting to discredit is frequently done with FACT. Your implication was OPINION though.

BTW I don't have a direct line with the author.

[OCA]

You can always tell when an item about Hillary hits home- the deflecting begins in earnest.

Nobody deflected, just simply putting out the fact that your candidate has as much dirt on the same subject as the other.

[fj1200]

Feel free to start another thread on Trump's accuser. It's expressly legal to do so. We are a very open and giving board that way.

You mean the allegation with the 13 year-old, at the time, girl. That's OK, she'll apparently have her day in court.

[OCA]

I keep tabs on notorious trolls. Keeping threads on topic is one of the duties of being a mod.

You don't like it?

Would be great if there was actual trolling going on or..........if your definition of troll wasn't "someone with a differing view". Don't deny, it's as clear as day, crystal clear.

[Abbey Marie]

Where did I say it wasn't FACT? Attempting to discredit is frequently done with FACT. Your implication was OPINION though.

BTW I don't have a direct line with the author.

Mine, and the author's apparently. Still no implication about Obama, which is what it was implied "I" was doing.

I'm sure you can contact the author via the paper. Go for it- he/she is apparently wearing a tinfoil hat, no?

[fj1200]

Mine, and the author's apparently. Still no implication about Obama, which is what it was implied "I" was doing.

I'm sure you can contact the author via the paper. Go for it- he/she is apparently wearing a tinfoil hat, no?

[OCA]

And it was, is, on topic. You just don't like that alternative info dhowing equal dirt on both candidates was presented.

[NightTrain]

Would be great if there was actual trolling going on or..........if your definition of troll wasn't "someone with a differing view". Don't deny, it's as clear as day, crystal clear.

I already told you how this is going to go.

I will move this latest to the appropriate thread.

Next step is a thread ban for you, and it will escalate from there.

Is your direction starting to become clear to you, Slick?

[NightTrain]

I see censorship is alive and well(2nd time).

I smell the buthurt coming of NT

Where were you censored? Were any of your posts modified in any way?

Show me.

[OCA]

I already told you how this is going to go.

I will move this latest to the appropriate thread.

Next step is a thread ban for you, and it will escalate from there.

Is your direction starting to become clear to you, Slick?

Hahahahahahahaha

Go ahead thread ban it, i'll just get it overturned anyway.

[OCA]

Where were you censored? Were any of your posts modified in any way?

Show me.

Just the act of moving posts.

[OCA]

Oh man some things and some people never change.

[NightTrain]

Hahahahahahahaha

Go ahead thread ban it, i'll just get it overturned anyway.

Think so?

Take a 24 hour vacation.

[jimnyc]

It is expressly illegal to go off topic in an anti-hillary or pro-trump thread. You were out that day.

I've seen 100x more of folks changing the subject to Trump when discussing Hillary, or changing it to something else when positive info about Trump. And you have been one of those folks. I'm NOT complaining about that - but those that DO complain, shouldn't be one of those that do it non-stop as a habit, as you do.