Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475726

    Default Possible Illegal Coordination Between Clinton Campaign and Super PACs

    And if possible, would this possibly surprise anyone?

    -----

    Possible Illegal Coordination Between Clinton Campaign and Super PACs

    A newly released email via WikiLeaks from Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook to the candidate herself, Hillary Clinton, suggests the campaign crafted a formal strategy to coordinate with at least two super PACs, Correct the Record and Priorities USA, potentially violating political campaign laws.

    Madame Secretary,

    Attached is a memo Marc prepared on some issues related to superpacs and
    state parties we wanted to discuss with you next week, specifically (1)
    coordination of rapid response with Correct the Record; (2) coordination of
    some ads with Priorities; (3) use of state parties to defray costs; and (4)
    suing the FEC to compel action against Bush and Republican superpacs.
    I’ve talked with Huma and Alex about finding a time that might be
    convenient for you. This is probably best to do in-person, but if your
    schedule doesn’t permit, we’ll arrange for a call.
    Let us know if you have any questions in advance!

    Robby
    The email comes with a memo as a pdf attachment addressing how the campaign believed it could use a reading of current law to coordinate legally. The memo, in part, outlines the strategy, as such:

    ***** snipped *****

    It would appear they may have been willing to bend current campaign laws to the point of risking a court test to determine whether or not they may actually be breaking them.

    Yesterday, The Intercept website reported that Neera Tanden, President of the Center for American Progress had expressed concerns in May over the campaign’s coordination with at least one Super PAC: “That’s fine. But skirting if not violating law doesn’t help her INMHO”.

    More via The Intercept:

    But as a recently released email chain shows, even Tanden was concerned in May last year that plans of a pro-Clinton Super PAC to directly coordinate with the campaign were “shady” and “skirting if not violating [the] law.

    This is a developing story.

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...nd-super-pacs/

  2. Thanks Kathianne thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Mouth of the Rogue River, Oregon USA
    Posts
    9,585
    Thanks (Given)
    8103
    Thanks (Received)
    7926
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1560
    Piss Off (Given)
    3
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19808675

    Default

    It's not a shock at all considering what the Clinton mechanism has gotten
    away with for years.
    I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?

    "I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"

    A Deplorable!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums