"Government" is a necessary function at this stage of human development at least. In western liberal democracies apart from the nihilists and socio-anarchists (who have different views by the way) the argument is really only about the size and nature of government, not whether or not government should exist.
Looking at the two terms of the Bush Administration it's clear that it's not "government" that's the problem, it's the lack of competence of those occupying certain government offices.
So it's no contradiction in terms for a liberal (US terminology) to support government and urge that it should be of a size and nature likely to be effective, yet for that same person to condemn the incompetence of the Bush Administration.
"Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008