Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Temecula, California
    Posts
    2,413
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14053

    Default Homosexual Immorality: What’s the Debate?

    Washington, D.C. — On August 9, MTV’s homosexual cable network, Logo, is hosting the first-ever presidential debate intended to promote the homosexual and transgender (gender identity disorder) lifestyles. All major presidential candidates have been invited to participate. To date, all Republican presidential candidates have declined, while all major Democratic candidates have accepted. Those candidates who have accepted are Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-New York), Sen. Barack Obama (D-Illinois), former Sen. John Edwards (D-North Carolina), Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut), former Sen. Mike Gravel (D-Alaska), and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio).

    Both Joe Solmonese, president of the homosexual “Human Rights Campaign” and lesbian singer/activist Melissa Etheridge have been selected as panelists.

    Matt Barber, CWA’s Policy Director for Cultural Issues, said, “This debate is clearly designed to advance the radical homosexual agenda and to promote social and governmental acceptance and celebration of the high-risk and destructive homosexual lifestyle.

    “It’s disgraceful that our nation’s moral standards have now dipped so low that it’s considered ‘tolerant’ to hold a debate organized entirely around the promotion of sexual immorality. What’s next? Are presidential candidates going to be asked to participate in a debate on how to garner widespread acceptance of adultery or incest? Are members of the growing polygamy lobby and the pedophile group NAMBLA going to tap candidates for a televised debate to promote their chosen lifestyles?

    “Thousands of years of history, every major world religion, the unambiguous science of human biology and good old fashioned common sense have established that homosexual behaviors are both immoral and destructive to the lives, health and spiritual well being of those who choose to participate in those behaviors. For instance, the CDC has recently determined that 71 percent of all males living with deadly HIV/AIDS were infected with the disease through homosexual behaviors,” said Barber, “Furthermore, the CDC has determined that homosexuals — especially males — are by far at greatest risk for nearly all forms of sexually transmitted disease as well as other lifestyle related injuries.

    “Will any of the presidential candidates bring up any of these facts during the debate? Organizers are expecting them to fall all over themselves trying to prove to the world who’s most sympathetic to the left’s twisted version of ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity.’ But there’s nothing to debate here. These candidates should play it straight, so to speak, and call it like it is. Immorality is immorality,” concluded Barber.


    http://www.therealitycheck.org/TRCMe.../cwa072207.htm
    POLITICAL ACTIVISTS CREED
    "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds" -Samuel Adams

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
    stand ready to do violence on their behalf."~George Orwell

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default

    Hmm...

    The things people were saying in those articles sounds deeply familiar to what people said about blacks during the 40s, 50's, and 60's.

    All of the Republican candidates declined because if they were to go to the debate and say "gay is bad", then most of the country would disagree with them...especially moderates. If they were to go and say "gay is fine" then their insane religious voters would get mad.

    Therefore it’s best for them to just not open their mouth. I except we'll hear very little from them on this issue.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    to the left’s twisted version of ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity.’ But there’s nothing to debate here.
    So, are you sayin' you have somethin' against tolerance and diversity?

    Or would you rather have fags, dykes, and trannies remain second class citizens?

    Y'know what?

    If you don't like fags, don't fuck any.
    Let'm live the way they want and leavem the fuck alone.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spyder Jerusalem View Post
    So, are you sayin' you have somethin' against tolerance and diversity?

    Or would you rather have fags, dykes, and trannies remain second class citizens?

    Y'know what?

    If you don't like fags, don't fuck any.
    Let'm live the way they want and leavem the fuck alone.
    So are you sayin you think its ok for a guy to fuck another guy in his shit pit?

    I say let them admit its a choice and leave marriage out of their perverse lifestyle choice and then they can go buttfuck and catch HIV all they want.

    Spyder a word of advice, your sorry ass arguments on this subject have been ripped a new asshole at least a thousand times, best not to go there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    Hmm...

    The things people were saying in those articles sounds deeply familiar to what people said about blacks during the 40s, 50's, and 60's.

    All of the Republican candidates declined because if they were to go to the debate and say "gay is bad", then most of the country would disagree with them...especially moderates. If they were to go and say "gay is fine" then their insane religious voters would get mad.

    Therefore it’s best for them to just not open their mouth. I except we'll hear very little from them on this issue.
    I'm not exactly sure if you are simply retarded or just being purposely obtuse, the percentage of people who think queer choice is fine is so tiny as to not even register on the scale. Don't believe me? Just check the results of the vote in any state that has banned queer marriage including ultralib Oregon.

    PWNED

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spyder Jerusalem View Post
    So, are you sayin' you have somethin' against tolerance and diversity?

    Or would you rather have fags, dykes, and trannies remain second class citizens?

    Y'know what?

    If you don't like fags, don't fuck any.
    Let'm live the way they want and leavem the fuck alone.
    tolerating bad behavior is always bad. Diversity for diversities sake is always bad because it inherently divides the people.

    Id rather they repented of their sins, turned away from the behavior that is destroying their lives and the lives of the people surrounding them. But I suppose expecting people to take responsibility for their actions and who they are is too much to ask.

    No instead, we are supposed to encourage this dangerous and unhealthy behavior. We are supposed to degrade these people by telling them they have no choice, that they cant change. We are supposed to degrade them by encouraging them to run away from who they are and confusing themselves by letting some doctor take advantage of them by changing their gender.

    Heaven forbid we actually care what our fellow man is doing. How selfish of us.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    So are you sayin you think its ok for a guy to fuck another guy in his shit pit?

    I say let them admit its a choice and leave marriage out of their perverse lifestyle choice and then they can go buttfuck and catch HIV all they want.

    Spyder a word of advice, your sorry ass arguments on this subject have been ripped a new asshole at least a thousand times, best not to go there.
    Those arguments only been defeated in your mind - that means it's propaganda.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    I'm not exactly sure if you are simply retarded or just being purposely obtuse, the percentage of people who think queer choice is fine is so tiny as to not even register on the scale. Don't believe me? Just check the results of the vote in any state that has banned queer marriage including ultralib Oregon.

    PWNED
    Having a majority opinion on something doesn't make it right. If that was the case then lynching blacks in the South would have been a moral act.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    Those arguments only been defeated in your mind - that means it's propaganda.
    Diuretic, used to think you were rational and analytic........thats all blown to hell in one post. Guess you don't pay attention either.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    Having a majority opinion on something doesn't make it right. If that was the case then lynching blacks in the South would have been a moral act.

    Fortunately limey we live in a democracy, the people were given a vote on this and the vote was for banning. Many Blacks I know consider it an insult that you compare them, a people who are born who they are and cannot change to people who choose to live the way they do. Its an insult that you equate the two.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    tolerating bad behavior is always bad. Diversity for diversities sake is always bad because it inherently divides the people.

    Id rather they repented of their sins, turned away from the behavior that is destroying their lives and the lives of the people surrounding them. But I suppose expecting people to take responsibility for their actions and who they are is too much to ask.

    No instead, we are supposed to encourage this dangerous and unhealthy behavior. We are supposed to degrade these people by telling them they have no choice, that they cant change. We are supposed to degrade them by encouraging them to run away from who they are and confusing themselves by letting some doctor take advantage of them by changing their gender.

    Heaven forbid we actually care what our fellow man is doing. How selfish of us.
    Who says any behaviour is "bad"? Government? Through the law? Diversity is bad? You mean the immigrant population of the US, which over many year has transformed the US from a monocultural country to one of the most culturally diverse countries on earth is bad? Jeez we're all mixed breeds and we're better off for it. What are you after? Ein volk?
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    What are you after? Ein volk?
    That's exactly what they're after.
    Ein Volk, Ein Gott, Ein Reich!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Temecula, California
    Posts
    2,413
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14053

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spyder Jerusalem View Post
    So, are you sayin' you have somethin' against tolerance and diversity?
    When the result is this...

    For instance, the CDC has recently determined that 71 percent of all males living with deadly HIV/AIDS were infected with the disease through homosexual behaviors,” said Barber, “Furthermore, the CDC has determined that homosexuals — especially males — are by far at greatest risk for nearly all forms of sexually transmitted disease as well as other lifestyle related injuries.
    I am against it and no, I don't have any tolerance for it.
    POLITICAL ACTIVISTS CREED
    "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds" -Samuel Adams

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
    stand ready to do violence on their behalf."~George Orwell

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Tolerance isn't required. A bit of humanity would go a long way though.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    “Furthermore, the CDC has determined that homosexuals — especially males — are by far at greatest risk for nearly all forms of sexually transmitted disease as well as other lifestyle related injuries.
    Meaningless statistic.

    Especially when the same numbers apply to heterosexuals as well.
    A disease is no respecter of sexual orientation.

    Tolerance did not cause aids, asshole.

    “Furthermore, the CDC has determined that homosexuals — especially males — are by far at greatest risk for nearly all forms of sexually transmitted disease as well as other lifestyle related injuries.
    Absolute bullshit lie.

    That's not what the CDC determined AT ALL.

    Why dontcha go there and see?

    http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/survei...orts/index.htm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums