Trump to Support Nationwide Concealed Carry

[Kathianne]

I am thinking that part of the spirit of this is to have each of the states recognize the
validity of a Conceal Carry Permit issued in another state. That would simplify everything,
yet not step on "State's Rights".

Hell...there is open carry in Oregon. I see it often and these folks are not blood thirsty
shooters. Carry a handgun for rattlesnakes, varmints and the like.

I hear what you are saying, but think the 'state regulations' take precedence. It's like if you are traveling to a foreign country, you need to abide by their laws. A state can say that the speed in residential areas is 25mph; you need to abide by that, even if your ordinances are 30mph.

[Elessar]

I hear what you are saying, but think the 'state regulations' take precedence. It's like if you are traveling to a foreign country, you need to abide by their laws. A state can say that the speed in residential areas is 25mph; you need to abide by that, even if your ordinances are 30mph.

I understand, but a happy medium should be reached....and I never ignore that black on white sign, either. Some of the towns up the US 101
in Oregon are speed traps!

[Kathianne]

I understand, but a happy medium should be reached....and I never ignore that black on white sign, either. Some of the towns up the US 101
in Oregon are speed traps!

I don't think that states need to 'compromise' to a medium. One state may make very strict laws, i.e., Illinois. Another may decide 'anything goes' though I don't think there is a state like that.

What cannot be done, via 2nd amendment are state or local laws that are so onerous as to deny one's rights. IL has had some regulations brought to court and lost, as it should be.

Individuals can decide that the least restrictive laws are what they want and either work to get their state to do so or move to a state that's already on board.

That's the way abortion was prior to federal usurpation in Roe v Wade.

[Elessar]

I do not have a CCP...but I agree with your premise that a person who does should check with
other state authorities when traveling across the country, and secure the firearm as per the
state's statutes.

It's pretty easy to contact State Police in each of our 50.

[Kathianne]

I not not have a CCP...but I agree with your premise that a person who does should check with
other state authorites when traveling across the country, and secure the firearm as per the
state's statutes.

It's pretty easy to contact State Police in each of our 50.

I think that the federalist system is the best there is. Let the states do what they should, let the Constitution check when they go too far. Keep the fed out of their business and do what they are supposed to regarding borders, self-defense, and national interests as a whole.

[Balu]

I think that an "absentee ballot" taken beforehand, presenting in any polling station all over the country, could have solved the problem. But... it is workable and useful when direct voting is concerned. When every voice is valuable and counted to the favor of candidate, but not to the majority voted in a certain State of a country.

[Kathianne]

I think that an "absentee ballot" taken beforehand, presenting in any polling station all over the country, could have solved the problem. But... it is workable and useful when direct voting is concerned. When every voice is valuable and counted to the favor of candidate, but not to the majority voted in a certain State of a country.

I thinyou may have posed on the wrong thread?