Simple Question

[OCA]

If you are dumb enough to find a need to ask that question. There is nothing you need to hear here. You seem to fail to remember. Those who died, in the uniform of our nation, while fighting an enemy....were doing their duty to this country. They followed orders from the President, and Congress. So your reasoning is typically ignorant, if you feel so superior to others by asking the question. I heard millions of demonstrators in the 60's, and 70's ask the same thing. But not you, or any of them ever bothered to Leave this nation...as you should have because of your IGNORANCE.

I knew you wouldn't answer honestly.

[aboutime]

I knew you wouldn't answer honestly.

You really are deranged. What part of what I said was a lie? Other than what your feeble, illiterate, challenged gray matter sponge would insist?

Only one word can answer your question. COUNTRY.

[Russ]

Precise!
And this is a controversy when President can be elected by the minority of voted electors in your whole country. The same happened in 2000 when Bush scored a minority but won Gore.

Welcome back, Balu. And I'm going to say that this election protest situation is a good example of zugzwang. The Dems and Republicans would both like the other side to do something, but don't want to step into it themselves.

[Elessar]

Honest question.........what actually did they die for? Certainly American freedom and democracy wasn't on the line.

Initially it was during the cold war to try and prevent the spread of Communism...

Our French allies were hard put to keep up with that and rebuild their own nation after WWII, so we intervened for
them in was what was called French Indo-China.

The effort was increased a thousand fold under a Democratic President, Lyndon B. Johnson. He was a Dem war-monger.
Blame those deaths on him and nobody else.

[OCA]

Initially it was during the cold war to try and prevent the spread of Communism...

Our French allies were hard put to keep up with that and rebuild their own nation after WWII, so we intervened for
them in was what was called French Indo-China.

The effort was increased a thousand fold under a Democratic President, Lyndon B. Johnson. He was a Dem war-monger.
Blame those deaths on him and nobody else.

Wrong answer.

[Elessar]

Wrong answer.

Right answer....just ask anyone who grew up then.

Prove me wrong. You cannot.

[Balu]

No, it is likely more important today than at any time. This election certainly had populism and nationalism introduced, while the electorate was split nearly in half. With that being the case, it's more important than ever that all regions are given a chance to be heard, the electoral college to some degree balances out the differences between densely populated areas with the rural and less populated states.

It prevents 'regions' from dominating the system, while still keeping representation pretty close to equal.

Then there are the problems that can come from one centralized voting system, we have 50+. That makes wholesale fraud darn near impossible.

Thank you so much for your kind expressing your attitude towards the existing election system. For me it is very interesting to learn the thoughts and arguments of a real person, but not engaged "experts" and corrupt journalists whom I don't trust.

[Black Diamond]

Honest question.........what actually did they die for? Certainly American freedom and democracy wasn't on the line.

Stop the spread of communism.

[Black Diamond]

Initially it was during the cold war to try and prevent the spread of Communism...

Our French allies were hard put to keep up with that and rebuild their own nation after WWII, so we intervened for
them in was what was called French Indo-China.

The effort was increased a thousand fold under a Democratic President, Lyndon B. Johnson. He was a Dem war-monger.
Blame those deaths on him and nobody else.

No blame for Kennedy??

[Balu]

The United States is built on the right to freely protest. If aboutime was alive at the time of the American Revolution, I am guessing that he would consider our Founding Fathers as disgusting and ignorant legal scofflaws who dared to oppose the rules set down by the British Crown.

There IS a certain difference between Democracy and Anarchy. Isn't it?

[Black Diamond]

There IS a certain difference between Democracy and Anarchy. Isn't it?

Sometimes the lines are blurred.

[Balu]

Sometimes the lines are blurred.

But not in cases when legal results of election are concerned. There nature of election is that one of the Parties wins and the other loses.

[NightTrain]

There IS a certain difference between Democracy and Anarchy. Isn't it?

Yes.

What we're seeing here is total panic as reality sets in. The free ride welfare people know that very soon they'll have to work like the rest of us.

And they're not happy about that.

[OCA]

Right answer....just ask anyone who grew up then.

Prove me wrong. You cannot.

Corporate interests, specifically big oil.
http://www.luckinlove.com/oilwar.htm

[OCA]

Stop the spread of communism.

Laughable