Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default Checks and Balances

    There are so many built within the Constitution, almost like the folks writing it knew not to trust politicians. Well many of these have been removed by a much stronger executive, leading a Congress that doesn't like to take responsibility for decisions, so they abdicate the decisions to the even stronger executive.

    One of the checks on the Senate, the filibuster, helped to protect the minority party. Back in 2013, Harry Reid decided that the rule was pesky for pushing through what the President wanted, so 'he nuked it.' At the time, they 'compromised' with the minority, retaining the filibuster for judicial nominees.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...enate/3662445/

    <section id="module-position-PfjY85kgbtY" class="storytopbar-bucket story-headline-module story-story-headline-module" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">U.S. Senate goes 'nuclear,' changes filibuster rules

    </section><section id="module-position-PfjY85kqxxo" class="storytopbar-bucket priority-asset-module story-priority-asset-module" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"></section>Susan Davis and Richard Wolf, USA TODAY3:06 p.m. EST November 21, 2013

    ...
    Last month, Reid announced that he was certain that the filibuster would be removed with a new Democrat led Senate, under President Clinton:

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/harr...-nuclear-again

    Harry Reid's Parting Shot: Dems Will Nuke The Filibuster For SCOTUS

    ByLAUREN FOXPublishedOCTOBER 24, 2016, 1:16 PM EDT


    Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said he is confident that he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if they win back the Senate in November.


    Envisioning Hillary Clinton in the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate, Reid warned that if a Senate Republican minority block her Supreme Court nominee, he is confident the party won't hesitate to change the filibuster rules again.


    Such a move would be an extension of what Reid did in 2013 when he was still majority leader, eliminating filibusters (with a simple majority vote) on the President's nominees. There was only one exception: the Supreme Court. As it stands now, Democrats still need 60 votes to move forward with a Supreme Court nominee.


    Reid said, however, that could change.



    “I really do believe that I have set the Senate so when I leave, we’re going to be able to get judges done with a majority. It takes only a simple majority anymore. And, it’s clear to me that if the Republicans try to filibuster another circuit court judge, but especially a Supreme Court justice, I’ve told 'em how and I’ve done it, not just talking about it. I did it in changing the rules of the Senate. It’ll have to be done again," Reid told TPM in a wide-ranging interview about his time in the Senate and his legacy.

    ...


    I'd say it's likely that the Republicans will be thanking him for the advice meant for others, it will work for them too.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks NightTrain, revelarts thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    13,988
    Thanks (Given)
    8494
    Thanks (Received)
    15307
    Likes (Given)
    3307
    Likes (Received)
    3829
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    201 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475185

    Default

    Yep. Democrats were warned at the time that gutting the power of the filibuster was going to haunt them in spades in the near future.

    Response :

    Remarkable lack of foresight. As the reality sets in as to what they've done to themselves, the few remaining Democrats are eating each other in full panic.

    The monumental failures are never their fault, though.
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

  4. Thanks Kathianne thanked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    12,788
    Thanks (Given)
    7730
    Thanks (Received)
    7700
    Likes (Given)
    818
    Likes (Received)
    2832
    Piss Off (Given)
    8
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19919859

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NightTrain View Post
    Yep. Democrats were warned at the time that gutting the power of the filibuster was going to haunt them in spades in the near future.

    Response :

    Remarkable lack of foresight. As the reality sets in as to what they've done to themselves, the few remaining Democrats are eating each other in full panic.

    The monumental failures are never their fault, though.
    Hubris on Reid's part?

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    13,988
    Thanks (Given)
    8494
    Thanks (Received)
    15307
    Likes (Given)
    3307
    Likes (Received)
    3829
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    201 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Diamond View Post
    Hubris on Reid's part?

    And then some.

    But they all went along with it and cheered him on, so unless it's a democratic freshman saying anything, they really can't.


    Haha! Just kidding!

    Joe Manchin, Senator (WV 2010 - present) said this a couple days ago : Reid is “an absolute embarrassment to the Senate as an institution, our Democratic party, and the nation."

    In fairness, though, Trump carried WV by a whopping 42 points last Tuesday, so I imagine that Manchin is a bit uncomfortable right now.

    But where was Manchin as Dirty Harry set the stage for a powerless Senate minority back in 2013? Yeah, he was on board with that : Full speed ahead, Cap'n Harry! No icebergs for miles!
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

  7. Thanks Kathianne thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums