Jill Stein Demands Recount in Wisconsin

[NightTrain]

This will get very interesting, but not for the reasons that are motivating Jill Stein.

There's a very good reason Hillary didn't demand a recount and closer inspection of WI, PA and MI. How many deceased and illegals cast a vote a couple weeks ago?
We'll soon find out, and the moonbats are paying for it. Win/Win.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...n-recount.html

[Black Diamond]

Why isn't Stein demanding a recount in new Hampshire and Nevada?

[Elessar]

Why isn't Stein demanding a recount in new Hampshire and Nevada?

Simple. She's an idiot.

[NightTrain]

Simple. She's an idiot.

Yeah... she IS the leader of the green party, after all.

[aboutime]

In a way. I think this may be a good thing. Demanding a recount in those states just might EXPOSE the workings....denied workings....of the Hillary fans, and Democrat liars, once and for all.

Whoever first said "Be careful what you ask for...." Would probably have told Stein to "BE CAREFUL" as well. When you open a garbage can full of rotting democrats, you get more than flies, maggots, and stink. You even expose the TRUTH that stinks too!

[Elessar]

Yeah... she IS the leader of the green party, after all.

Oh..the Greens have some good intentions, but they are more attached to the liberal
side of the house than the mainstream.

[NightTrain]

Oh..the Greens have some good intentions, but they are more attached to the liberal
side of the house than the mainstream.

Well, you guys must have a different flavor of Greenie down there. Up here their main focus is to turn the whole State of AK into a national park, and any kind of development anywhere is bogged down in endless lawsuits with no merit.

What really gets my goat is their campaigns are run from liberals in places like CT, FL, CA, etc. All they really are here are puppets on the ground here to do their bidding for the Sierra Club or PETA or any other mob of eco-hippies.

[Russ]

This will get very interesting, but not for the reasons that are motivating Jill Stein.

There's a very good reason Hillary didn't demand a recount and closer inspection of WI, PA and MI. How many deceased and illegals cast a vote a couple weeks ago?
We'll soon find out, and the moonbats are paying for it. Win/Win.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...n-recount.html

I hope you're right about it being a win/win, NT. It sound kooky to me, though, that a candidate is demanding a recount after receiving 1% of the popular vote and zero electoral votes. It seems to me she has no standing. She's either a shill for Hillary, or she's doing it as a scam to make money, like Trump says.

I also remain slightly nervous about the recounts, not because a legitimate recount might overturn the results, but because I wouldn't put it past the Obama administration to tamper with the recount. Or to fabricate a case of "Russian hacking" in order to invalidate a bunch of votes. Let's face it, Obama has a lot of motivation to give the office to Hillary.

[Noir]

I'd considered donating to the Greens recount fund when I got directed to its page about a week ago, glad to see they made enough to putin the challenge- given what I've read/watched about votes in your system it can only be good to have and indepth look.

[Bilgerat]

I'd considered donating to the Greens recount fund when I got directed to its page about a week ago, glad to see they made enough to putin the challenge- given what I've read/watched about votes in your system it can only be good to have and indepth look.

But Hillary disagreed not that long ago

[NightTrain]

I hope you're right about it being a win/win, NT. It sound kooky to me, though, that a candidate is demanding a recount after receiving 1% of the popular vote and zero electoral votes. It seems to me she has no standing. She's either a shill for Hillary, or she's doing it as a scam to make money, like Trump says.

I also remain slightly nervous about the recounts, not because a legitimate recount might overturn the results, but because I wouldn't put it past the Obama administration to tamper with the recount. Or to fabricate a case of "Russian hacking" in order to invalidate a bunch of votes. Let's face it, Obama has a lot of motivation to give the office to Hillary.

I haven't read even one article that quotes a professional in this sort of thing saying they've got a snowball's chance.

I really do think it's a way for Stein to grab money from the desperate moonbats, and it appears to be working remarkably well... almost $7 million collected so far! Not a bad racket, since the WI recount was estimated at about $1 million the last time I saw.

I don't think there's a statement from Jill anywhere saying she'll give back any monies that isn't applied to the recount(s). She gets free PR and makes a few million off the hapless liberals sobbing about the election.

[Noir]

But Hillary disagreed not that long ago

Oh no! Because I care so much about Hillarys opinion!!!

[jimnyc]

Let them waste their money, and that of the beanheads willing to donate for the recounts. Money they spend, money then no longer have - and more stuff for me to continue to giggle at!!

[Bilgerat]

I haven't read even one article that quotes a professional in this sort of thing saying they've got a snowball's chance.

I really do think it's a way for Stein to grab money from the desperate moonbats, and it appears to be working remarkably well... almost $7 million collected so far! Not a bad racket, since the WI recount was estimated at about $1 million the last time I saw.

I don't think there's a statement from Jill anywhere saying she'll give back any monies that isn't applied to the recount(s). She gets free PR and makes a few million off the hapless liberals sobbing about the election.

The PR's the thing. She's elevating her status from a relative unknown to up close & personal.

[Gunny]

I haven't read even one article that quotes a professional in this sort of thing saying they've got a snowball's chance.

I really do think it's a way for Stein to grab money from the desperate moonbats, and it appears to be working remarkably well... almost $7 million collected so far! Not a bad racket, since the WI recount was estimated at about $1 million the last time I saw.

I don't think there's a statement from Jill anywhere saying she'll give back any monies that isn't applied to the recount(s). She gets free PR and makes a few million off the hapless liberals sobbing about the election.

I still don't even know who she is, and don't really care. If any -- and I mean ANY -- legitimacy is given to any of this recount crap especially at the Federal level (electoral college crap) it'll throw our entire voting system into chaos. Glad I got lots of lead.