DNC and MSM avoiding discussion of Seth Rich

[jimnyc]

The amount of hatred coming from this discussion, and the amount towards Hannity for daring to bring it up. "Kim Dotcom" is a hacker, and I'll believe his word about Rich 7 days a week over democrats. Can you imagine if this was traced back to someone?

---

DNC, Media and John Podesta Block Discussion of Seth Rich’s Murder… Even Using ‘Bots’ to Trash Hannity on Rich Coverage

Mainstream Media (MSM) is pushing invalidated, unsubstantiated and crazy conspiratorial stories about President Trump colluding with Russia to win last year’s election. But liberal media won’t touch the story about former DNC staffer Seth Rich being gunned down in Washington DC last year.

Democrats and their media continue to push the false tale that Trump worked with Russia to steal the 2016 Presidential election. This lie is being promoted on all media outlets as a matter of fact even though there is no evidence to support the accusation. Democrats and the MSM have argued that Trump somehow supplied DNC emails to WikiLeaks that impacted the election and gave the victory to Trump. This is of course is false on all levels. For example, DNC emails were released by WikiLeaks before the election but for the most part the MSM ignored them. Also, the emails did contain information that showed unethical, if not criminal, actions by John Podesta and Hillary Clinton before the campaign, but there is no information to date that proves that the emails released were in any way false or made up.

Hillary Clinton’s creepy former Campaign Manager John Podesta has a history of seedy and alleged illegal activity. The late Andrew Breitbart, entrepreneur and creator of Breitbart.com knew this back in 2012 (warning on language):

(video at site)

Breitbart was ahead of his time.

The WikiLeaks emails proved that the Clinton campaign was in cahoots with the media. At least 65 MSM reporters were meeting with and/or coordinating offline with top Hillary advisers. The emails also showed that as early as December 2015 Podesta discussed Trump’s “bromance with Putin” and the potential for using it as a means to slander Trump.





The day after Hillary’s loss to President Trump, it is reported that Podesta and the Clinton campaign put the Trump/Russia smear campaign into full swing. Podesta and Clinton led this smear campaign in spite of having multiple connections with Russia themselves.

Hillary, through the Clinton Foundation, received millions from Russia in return for providing a large percentage of US uranium to Russia while Secretary of State under President Obama. As for Podesta, his own emails released by WikiLeaks show that he received 75,000 shares in a Russia President Vladimir Putin connected energy company and then in an apparent move to cover this up, gave the shares to his daughter.

Rest here - http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...solved-murder/

[gabosaurus]

The whole "Seth Rich was assassinated" thing is a hoax concocted by Sean Hannity and picked up by right wing "sources." Every facet of the hoax has been debunked. Hannity's refusal to give up on the sham is costing him multiple advertisers, just like O'Reilly was sunk by his sexual misconduct shenanigans.
Fox is totally digging its own grave with this one.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...ich-conspiracy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ths-explained/

(Yes, I know the MSM will never match up to the amazing Gateway Pundit. You don't even need to tell me. )

[revelarts]

Hannity?

the Sane PROGRESSIVE...

Streamed live on May 16, 2017
Link for tech fundraiser. THANK YOU to everyone who donated thus far: https://www.paypal.me/saneprogressive
SOURCES AND LINKS FOR VIDEO: CLICK SHOW MORE
Here's the link CIA Intelligence Debunking 'HACKING' Claims:
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12...
Narrative of Russia Created by Clinton/Podesta According to Campaign Insiders:
http://www.worldtribune.com/shattered...
On Seth Rich Murder and Newspaper Report Links at Time:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/08/10/s...
Zero Hedge Report:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05...
Daily Mail:
seth-rich-was-contact-wikileaks-says-former-dc-homicide-detecti
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...
Assange Retweets Story:
https://twitter.com/fox5dc/status/864...
Family's private investigator: There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death
http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news...
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mur...
Information on Rich's family denouncing significance of evidence, watch fb video:
https://www.facebook.com/saneprogress...
Family Spokesman is high level Dem party spokesperson, NO WONDER it sounded like a statement from DNC:
http://www.netrootsnation.org/profile...


what the investigator said and didn't say.
H. A. Goodman


Progressive Jimmy Dore


FYI
http://kim.com

[NightTrain]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>wrote:


> Agree. Happy to talk to the David's. Call me crazy, but I think if we can
> survive the next month, it will be possible, maybe even straightforward to
> get our arms around this once there is an actual campaign. I'm definitely
> for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real
> basis for it.
>
> JP
> --Sent from my iPad--
> john.podesta@gmail.com

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36082

[aboutime]

Does anyone remember VINCE FOSTER?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/clinton-f...n-open-secret/

Seth Rich too?????

[BoogyMan]

Wrong. Wikileaks and others expressed concern immediately after it happened but only recently began to speak out loudly.

The whole "Seth Rich was assassinated" thing is a hoax concocted by Sean Hannity and picked up by right wing "sources." Every facet of the hoax has been debunked. Hannity's refusal to give up on the sham is costing him multiple advertisers, just like O'Reilly was sunk by his sexual misconduct shenanigans.
Fox is totally digging its own grave with this one.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...ich-conspiracy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ths-explained/

(Yes, I know the MSM will never match up to the amazing Gateway Pundit. You don't even need to tell me. )

[jimnyc]

The whole "Seth Rich was assassinated" thing is a hoax concocted by Sean Hannity and picked up by right wing "sources." Every facet of the hoax has been debunked. Hannity's refusal to give up on the sham is costing him multiple advertisers, just like O'Reilly was sunk by his sexual misconduct shenanigans.
Fox is totally digging its own grave with this one.

Ummmm, no. Hannity is WAY late, and certainly not something "concocted" by him. And I suppose a guy in a completely different country, a hacker, somehow works with Hannity?

And somehow just picked up by right wing sources? LOL Its been around for a LONG time, dumbass. Did you just read this crap somewhere else again? Maybe even just read the title only, again, as usual?

[gabosaurus]

Ummmm, no. Hannity is WAY late, and certainly not something "concocted" by him. And I suppose a guy in a completely different country, a hacker, somehow works with Hannity? And somehow just picked up by right wing sources? LOL Its been around for a LONG time, dumbass. Did you just read this crap somewhere else again? Maybe even just read the title only, again, as usual?

I am talking about the current spin of the story. Past reports have been thoroughly debunked by numerous sources. Rich's family have disclaimed the entire affair and begged Fox News to drop the story. I don't know how/why Hannity continues to run with this without a shred of credible evidence. Meanwhile, his show continues to lose advertisers.

[jimnyc]

I am talking about the current spin of the story. Past reports have been thoroughly debunked by numerous sources. Rich's family have disclaimed the entire affair and begged Fox News to drop the story. I don't know how/why Hannity continues to run with this without a shred of credible evidence. Meanwhile, his show continues to lose advertisers.

Are you saying that the supposed 43k+ emails supposedly sent from him to Wikileaks is a lie? I haven't seen definitive proof of this being true... but a detective apparently found proof that he was emailing Wikileaks in the weeks prior to dying. That's the source of the emails. You say that's been debunked? Can you provide sources? And that's not Hannity to blame at the very least.

[gabosaurus]

Did you even bothering reading the links I posted in this thread? If you did, it would save you a lot of trouble.

Are you saying that the supposed 43k+ emails supposedly sent from him to Wikileaks is a lie? I haven't seen definitive proof of this being true... but a detective apparently found proof that he was emailing Wikileaks in the weeks prior to dying.

This is merely an allegation. Not unlike the Trump contacts with Russia. Which right-wing sites have been furiously working to discredit.

You can pick and choose what you wish to believe, I suppose.

[Russ]

The whole "Seth Rich was assassinated" thing is a hoax concocted by Sean Hannity and picked up by right wing "sources." Every facet of the hoax has been debunked. Hannity's refusal to give up on the sham is costing him multiple advertisers, just like O'Reilly was sunk by his sexual misconduct shenanigans.
Fox is totally digging its own grave with this one.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...ich-conspiracy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ths-explained/

(Yes, I know the MSM will never match up to the amazing Gateway Pundit. You don't even need to tell me. )

Gabby - check out how well your post works if I just change a few words...

The whole "Seth Rich was assassinated" "Trump-Russia collusion" thing is a hoax concocted by Sean Hannity Hillary/John Podesta/the DNC and picked up by right wing "sources." CNN, the Washington Post and the NYTimes. Every facet of the hoax has been debunked. Hannity's CNN, the Washington Post and the NYTimes refusal to give up on the sham is costing him them multiple advertisers, just like O'Reilly Bill Clinton was sunk by his sexual misconduct shenanigans.
Fox is CNN, the Washington Post and the NYTimes are totally digging their own grave with this one.

[gabosaurus]

So why do you believe one of them and not the other?

[revelarts]

So why do you believe one of them and not the other?

Because those associated with wikileaks are correct nearly 98%+ of the time.
And have no agenda. While the us Intel groups, the WAPO and the DNC have much spottiter record if telling the truth.
In fact one of the DNC IT guys ran off to Pakistan for some reason and has avoided questions.
Plus Assange and associate s have said FROM THE BEGINNING that the source was a DNC leak and NOT any govt .

[Kathianne]

Because those associated with wikileaks are correct nearly 98%+ of the time.
And have no agenda. While the us Intel groups, the WAPO and the DNC have much spottiter record if telling the truth.
In fact one of the DNC IT guys ran off to Pakistan for some reason and has avoided questions.
Plus Assange and associate s have said FROM THE BEGINNING that the source was a DNC leak and NOT any govt .

and therein lies a problem:

https://www.wired.com/2017/05/russia...isinformation/

Russian Hackers Are Using ‘Tainted’ Leaks to Sow Disinformation

OVER THE PAST year, the Kremlin’s strategy of weaponizing leaks to meddle with democracies around the world has become increasingly clear, first in the US and more recently in France. But a new report by a group of security researchers digs into another layer of those so-called influence operations: how Russian hackers alter documents within those releases of hacked material, planting disinformation alongside legitimate leaks.


A new report from researchers at the Citizen Lab group at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Public Affairs documents a wide-ranging hacking campaign, with ties to known Russian hacker groups. The effort targeted more than 200 individuals, ranging from Russian media to a former Russian prime minister to Russian opposition groups, and assorted government and military personnel from Ukraine to Vietnam. Noteworthy among the leaks: A Russia-focused journalist and author whose emails were not only stolen but altered before their release. Once they appeared on a Russian hactivist site, Russian state media used the disinformation to concoct a CIA conspiracy.


The case could provide the clearest evidence yet that Russian hackers have evolved their tactics from merely releasing embarrassing true information to planting false leaks among those facts. “Russia has a long history of experience with disinformation,” says Ron Deibert, the political science professor who led Citizen Lab’s research into the newly uncovered hacking spree. “This is the first case of which I am aware that compares tainted documents to originals associated with a cyber espionage campaign.”

...

[jimnyc]

Did you even bothering reading the links I posted in this thread? If you did, it would save you a lot of trouble.



This is merely an allegation. Not unlike the Trump contacts with Russia. Which right-wing sites have been furiously working to discredit.

You can pick and choose what you wish to believe, I suppose.

I no longer bother with the Washington Post after they repeatedly posted apparently false and unsubstantiated and anonymous stories. I also don't consider a blog to be MSM.

I don't pick and choose, I gather information. Wikileaks was all over this LONG before Hannity came along. Kim has no reason to lie, and I'll believe Wiki and him at this point, as far as the EMAILS are concerned.