I see.
Have you ever read the text at the top left of the page - each and every page on here? It reads:
Debate Policy
Political Forum for Debate & Discussion
Debate & Discussion obviously do require arguments. Jim, however, doesn't have one. He doesn't scrutinize his opinions, hence he has no argument for them, hence he's shown himself unable to provide an argument for why replacing Kennedy would be "great for the court". Having been made aware of that, he quietly dropped the claim and underhandedly replaced it with "great for the right", which is obviously not the same. His angry reaction to having his stance tested and his shifting of the goal posts pointed out seems to indicate he's vaguely aware of all that.
That's the cost of merely taking a dump in public, lazily and shamefully, unthinkingly dumping mere unsupported opinions on here, regardless of the proud claims at the top left of the page. Now, Jim let me know in no uncertain terms he doesn't "give a shit" about my thinking - he's an honest guy like that - but he also doesn't give a shit about what he himself is thinking, as that would be a hindrance to merely dumping.
He probably hasn't thought about, and thus doesn't know, that replacing the swing vote with another reactionary in the Gorsuch mold would reduce the mainstream power, would have the extremists take over, add to the suspicion that the court is politicized. Obviously, this would lead to a decline of the court's stature, which in turn bodes ill for the respect for the law and the judiciary. But there is an upside in that the Dems would "go ape shit".
That's not "conservative", as Jim fashions himself, that's the tell-tale sign of being a reactionary, merely focused on "victory" for the right, defeat for the "other" side, no matter the cost, and unaware of and unconcerned with what current developments and possible future changes portend. At a time when public approval of both the White House and Congress languish at or near historic lows, it would be absolutely essential that the center holds at least in the highest court of the land. Jim disagrees, and hopes for that to be remedied. He finds that prospect "priceless", no argument necessary.
Apparently, he has you in support of merely taking a dump.