Bannon: The Trump presidency is 'over'

[pete311]

Bannon: The Trump presidency is 'over'
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...idency-is-over

[Black Diamond]

I think Pete read the headline and not the article.

[Kathianne]

I think Pete read the headline and not the article.

I agree, though my guess is that Bannon is going to war with Kushner, Ivanka, McMaster, and all those he considers 'globalists' meaning he doesn't like them and vice versa.

In order to do so, they've been holding President Trump 'hostage' to their points of view. He really is all that Bannon wanted, but they are not letting Trump be Trump and he's acquiescing. Eventually he will disown the Trump that wouldn't stand up for populism.

[Black Diamond]

Interesting he thinks it's gonna be hard for trump without him. I can't imagine those things he brought up in the article would have been more achievable with him on board.

[Kathianne]

Interesting he thinks it's gonna be hard for trump without him. I can't imagine those things he brought up in the article would have been more achievable with him on board.

I don't think there's anyone, including his kids, that could keep Trump from being Trump for more than a few days. Kelly may have done it the longest.

[pete311]

I think Pete read the headline and not the article.

I read the article and still think it's interesting.

[michiganFats]

I read the article and still think it's interesting.

If you read it you didn't understand it.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

I think Bannon was doing a little ringing of his own bell. I'm sure the Trump presidency isn't hinging entirely just on him. He sounds like he has a big head... well, he does, but I mean it figuratively.

[pete311]

If you read it you didn't understand it.

Why do you say this? All I did was link to an interesting article and everyone here seems to make assumptions. Bizarre really.

[PostmodernProphet]

Why do you say this? All I did was link to an interesting article and everyone here seems to make assumptions. Bizarre really.

one of the problems is that your title is not an accurate quote of what he said........now this is a common mistake of lib'ruls, who are unconcerned with accuracy.......

[pete311]

one of the problems is that your title is not an accurate quote of what he said........now this is a common mistake of lib'ruls, who are unconcerned with accuracy.......

Not my title, it's the title of the article. Here is the full quote, how is it so different?
“The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over,”

[Black Diamond]

Not my title, it's the title of the article. Here is the full quote, how is it so different?
“The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over,”

The headline, like most headlines nowadays, is misleading and dishonest.

[NightTrain]

Not my title, it's the title of the article. Here is the full quote, how is it so different?
“The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over,”

That is quite misleading when taken out of context like that to promote more moonbat clickbait, isn't it?

But that didn't stop you from gleefully scampering back here to post it, and then type it out again in all it's glory - and then you claimed you actually read the article which is doubtful prior to being called out on it.

The savvy internet user is wary of such dishonest headlines.

[PostmodernProphet]

Not my title, it's the title of the article. Here is the full quote, how is it so different?
“The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over,”

1) by not changing it you bought into the lie and repeated it....
2) if that is the full quote, why does it end in a comma?.....

[Black Diamond]

1) by not changing it you bought into the lie and repeated it....
2) if that is the full quote, why does it end in a comma?.....

You've heard of new math? Maybe this is new grammar