Big Chief
David Whitehouse uses flawed logic in his analysis. He arbitrarily uses 1998 as his starting year. If he has used 1997, his results would have been completely different. The fact is that for the past decade, for any year you pick in that decade, the 8 year trend has been upward.Originally Posted by red states rule
http://images.newstatesman.com/artic...0114_graph.jpg
Senior Member
Yea, since he does not buy into the global wamring crap - you dismiss him
Not ONE of the doom and gloom perdictions the enviro wckos have made have happened
Going back to the 70's when this BS started, everything you clowns have said was going to happen, never happened
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Big Chief
No, I'm using temperature data from the past 127 years to show that the trend has been upward for the past 40 or so.
Since you haven't stated what you're talking about here, I'm going to assume its the urban heat island effect. This effect has been adjusted for in the data I presented by comparing data from urban temperature measurements to data from rural temperature measurements in the same region.In reality the environs around the weather stations have changed.
I have no idea, maybe you should ask them.2. You are confused yet again, Mr. all-knowing scientist, so I'll rephrase a third time. Why do enviro-Marxists fight exploitation of natural gas deposits?
Senior Member
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Big Chief
No, I'm dismissing him because his analysis is blatantly flawed, and I've explained why its flawed. Instead of attacking my reasoning, you just declare me to be wrong and move on.
No, actually, the climatologists predicted the Earth would warm. And it did. So you're wrong.Going back to the 70's when this BS started, everything you clowns have said was going to happen, never happened
Big Chief
Is that all the evidence you have? A stupid cartoon? Go figure.
Listen, let me know when you want to talk about real facts.
Senior Member
Ever heard of the idiot Paul Erlich? One of the all time great liberal moonbat enviro wackos?
Like I said all the doom and gloom forcasts have never happened
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Big Chief
You mean Paul Erhlich the zoologist who wrote a book about overpopulation? What the fuck does that have to do with global warming? (Hint: NOTHING)
Your entire argument style is one of non sequitors. You claim the Earth hasn't warmed for the last 10 years, and use evidence that it might not warm for the next ten years as proof. Then you randomly spout off a bunch of crap about a guy who wrote a book about overpopulation.
Can you do us a favor, and make sense from now on?
Senior Member
He was talking about environmental disasters like NY residents wearing gas masks; or the mid west becoming deserts
More hot air from the enviro wackos
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Gunny's nightmare
1. Again, you are using a microscope to look at a very large object.
2. "Adjustments" can be adjusted to suit the opinion of the adjuster.
3. It has been my conclusion that you, and they, have no clue what you are talking about. Thanks for finally confirming that!
Senior Member
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Big Chief
Yeah, but he wasn't talking about global warming, and his background is in zoology, so what does it have to do with this discussion?
Big Chief
No, I'm using temperature data from the past 127 years to show that the trend has been upward for the past 40 or so. There's no microscopes involved here, nor are there large objects.
They could. Or they could be made to adjust for the effects of urban heating, as in this case.2. "Adjustments" can be adjusted to suit the opinion of the adjuster.
Senior Member
All of the enviro wacko perdictions also have not happened
First it was global cooling and the next ice age
Then it was global warming and the Earth was burning up
Now it is climate change and both the next ice age,a nd the Earth burning up wil now happen
Get a life
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Gunny's nightmare
I am not surprised that my subtlety escaped you yet again. The “large object” is climate change, or using the contemporary vernacular: “global warming”, which is the subject of this thread. Looking at a 40 year (or 127 year) record that may or may not show a trend and concluding that man is warming the earth is like looking at an elephant hair and coming to the conclusion that you are looking at a mouse.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote