Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    756
    Thanks (Given)
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.

    A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.

    Wars are fought for honor and a nuclear WWII would have nothing but shame for the initiator of such a war.

    Our leaders know that there would be no honor in a nuclear war that would destroy our environment and insure that there is no real winner. Any leader or military war machine under his command that would initiate such a war would know dishonor like the world has never seen. The hate for Hitler and his regime and ideology is still alive and well in the world and that hate would be dwarfed by the hate that the initiator of a third WWIII would feel from the world.

    The main reason for that hate and denial of honor would stem from the fact that any nuclear war would be fought against cities and their citizen instead of having an honorable battlefield war. No leader or military force will dishonor itself the way the U.S. did in Japan. Honor in war comes from facing an enemy man to man and our technology has now made that impossible. There is no honor in killing innocent non-combatant citizens in their beds from thousands of miles away. Ordinary people know this and so do their leaders and military.

    Mutual assured destruction says that any nuclear war will be self-genocide. Some who do not know why wars are fought, and honor sought, may think some leaders are foolish enough to initiate a nuclear war but forget that no high ranking military man, especially of Asian descent, would ever dishonor himself and his family by initiating such a war. Such a man of honor would never initiate such a dishonorable war. A man of honor would know though that he would not be doing his duty if he did not retaliate. Reciprocity is fair play and is honorable and duty and honor would force a reciprocal reply.

    Do you understand the psychological principles at play shown above and do you agree?

    Regards
    DL


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    29,608
    Thanks (Given)
    15422
    Thanks (Received)
    16093
    Likes (Given)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    1320
    Mentioned
    134 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop View Post
    A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.

    Wars are fought for honor and a nuclear WWII would have nothing but shame for the initiator of such a war.

    Our leaders know that there would be no honor in a nuclear war that would destroy our environment and insure that there is no real winner. Any leader or military war machine under his command that would initiate such a war would know dishonor like the world has never seen. The hate for Hitler and his regime and ideology is still alive and well in the world and that hate would be dwarfed by the hate that the initiator of a third WWIII would feel from the world.

    The main reason for that hate and denial of honor would stem from the fact that any nuclear war would be fought against cities and their citizen instead of having an honorable battlefield war. No leader or military force will dishonor itself the way the U.S. did in Japan. Honor in war comes from facing an enemy man to man and our technology has now made that impossible. There is no honor in killing innocent non-combatant citizens in their beds from thousands of miles away. Ordinary people know this and so do their leaders and military.

    Mutual assured destruction says that any nuclear war will be self-genocide. Some who do not know why wars are fought, and honor sought, may think some leaders are foolish enough to initiate a nuclear war but forget that no high ranking military man, especially of Asian descent, would ever dishonor himself and his family by initiating such a war. Such a man of honor would never initiate such a dishonorable war. A man of honor would know though that he would not be doing his duty if he did not retaliate. Reciprocity is fair play and is honorable and duty and honor would force a reciprocal reply.

    Do you understand the psychological principles at play shown above and do you agree?

    Regards
    DL
    Spoken like a true second grader in understand war, and the current geo-political situation.
    GET OFF MY LAWN

  3. Thanks hjmick thanked this post
    Likes hjmick liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21,511
    Thanks (Given)
    6251
    Thanks (Received)
    10495
    Likes (Given)
    108
    Likes (Received)
    643
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21102326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop View Post
    A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.

    Wars are fought for honor and a nuclear WWII would have nothing but shame for the initiator of such a war.

    Our leaders know that there would be no honor in a nuclear war that would destroy our environment and insure that there is no real winner. Any leader or military war machine under his command that would initiate such a war would know dishonor like the world has never seen. The hate for Hitler and his regime and ideology is still alive and well in the world and that hate would be dwarfed by the hate that the initiator of a third WWIII would feel from the world.

    The main reason for that hate and denial of honor would stem from the fact that any nuclear war would be fought against cities and their citizen instead of having an honorable battlefield war. No leader or military force will dishonor itself the way the U.S. did in Japan. Honor in war comes from facing an enemy man to man and our technology has now made that impossible. There is no honor in killing innocent non-combatant citizens in their beds from thousands of miles away. Ordinary people know this and so do their leaders and military.

    Mutual assured destruction says that any nuclear war will be self-genocide. Some who do not know why wars are fought, and honor sought, may think some leaders are foolish enough to initiate a nuclear war but forget that no high ranking military man, especially of Asian descent, would ever dishonor himself and his family by initiating such a war. Such a man of honor would never initiate such a dishonorable war. A man of honor would know though that he would not be doing his duty if he did not retaliate. Reciprocity is fair play and is honorable and duty and honor would force a reciprocal reply.

    Do you understand the psychological principles at play shown above and do you agree?

    Regards
    DL


    Tell that to this idiot: <img src="https://i.pinimg.com/236x/dd/24/cb/dd24cb5304e38728ed85453514010654--korean-girl-photos-google.jpg">
    Last edited by aboutime; 10-11-2017 at 10:23 PM.
    They called me Tombstone on my last ship.
    Now, I'm your Huckleberry.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    756
    Thanks (Given)
    35
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Spoken like a true second grader in understand war, and the current geo-political situation.
    Spoken like one who does not understand that no honorable soldier would dishonor himself, his family an his country by initiating a pre-emptive strike against innocent women and children and other non-combatants.

    Would you if you were an honorable solder?

    Regards
    DL
    Last edited by Gnostic Christian Bishop; 10-12-2017 at 09:21 AM.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    29,608
    Thanks (Given)
    15422
    Thanks (Received)
    16093
    Likes (Given)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    1320
    Mentioned
    134 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop View Post
    Spoken like one who does not understand that no honorable soldier would dishonor himself, his family an his country by initiating a pre-emptive strike against innocent women and children and other non-combatants.

    Would you if you were an honorable solder?

    Regards
    DL
    What exactly would YOU know about honor, much less what an honorable soldier would do? No "SOLDIER" worth 2 sh*ts is going to sit back and watch a first strike he knows to be inevitable happen that will murder millions of Americans at the same cost to the enemy of striking him first.

    Sell it to North Korea. No one on this side of the world has threatened a first strike. North Korea HAS. The dishonor is all THEIRS.

    Get out your slide rule and see if you can figure out the simplicity in that.
    GET OFF MY LAWN

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21,511
    Thanks (Given)
    6251
    Thanks (Received)
    10495
    Likes (Given)
    108
    Likes (Received)
    643
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21102326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop View Post
    Spoken like one who does not understand that no honorable soldier would dishonor himself, his family an his country by initiating a pre-emptive strike against innocent women and children and other non-combatants.

    Would you if you were an honorable solder?

    Regards
    DL
    Only a dishonorable, pretend soldier like yourself, Gnostic, would dishonor your family, and country by stopping a Pre-emptive, enemy strike to take place first in the name of hypocrisy...coming from someone who would take a knife to a gunfight.
    They called me Tombstone on my last ship.
    Now, I'm your Huckleberry.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •