Originally Posted by
darin
I hate reactionary and punitive legislation
I don't see it as punitive; although, I CAN see that one might see it that way. The issue hasn't come up before, but I am totally against it.
In 1988, Henery Cisneros was Mayor of San Antonio. He sold the city on an "Alamodome". Swore it would get us a pro football team. The cost? a "VIA" tax hike of a couple of cents. SO everyone is thinking, who cares if they jack the price of a bus ride a couple of pennies. Via is the transit system in San Antonio. What he failed to be specific is that "VIA" is ALSO the City of San Antonio. So we got jacked for a dome.
Do we have a pro team? Nope. We're the favorite stepchild for teams to threaten to come to until their cities cave. Still no team. The Spurs nixed the place (they played 3 seasons there) because a domed stadium is too big for basketball. We have an "Alamo Bowl" once a year there. Tractor pulls. The Saints played there after Katrina. Otherwise, it's this really ugly eyesore you can see from US 281 as you drive by that takes up a lot of space.
They of course pulled imminent domain in a mainly poor, black neighborhood and forced them out because they didn't have the means to fight the city.
So it's NOT reactionary with me. I've despised the practice since I was in my 20s. Our tax dollars, at any level of government, shouldn't pay for a bunch of over-aged kids to watch a bunch of overpaid crybaby over-aged kids chase a ball around.
For whatever reason, I'm for pulling the funding/tax breaks or whatever freebies these billionaires get.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke