Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475724

    Default Unborn recognized as fully human in Texas

    Good, it's a start, and should be recognized as so everywhere.

    ---

    Unborn Victim of Church Shooting Recognized as Fully Human Under Texas Law

    When the gunman walked into the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas, he reportedly targeted children. His youngest victim was a baby who had yet to be born. Under Texas law, if the murderer had lived, he would have faced a murder charge for the killing of the unborn baby.

    Quoting National Right to Life, "Under a [Texas] law signed June 20, 2003, and effective September 1, 2003, the protections of the entire criminal code extend to 'an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.' The law does not apply to 'conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child' or to 'a lawful medical procedure performed by a physican or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent.'"

    Even though the Texas feticide law doesn't extend to mothers who legally abort their babies, pro-abortion advocates still despise the law.

    An article published in 2014 at Rewire complained:

    The rush to establish "personhood" and the enthusiasm for protecting fetuses above all else has perverted the stated purpose of fetal homicide laws. Once intended to protect fetuses and provide to pregnant women and their families a legal remedy for wrongful death, fetal homicide laws are being misused by overzealous prosecutors and judges to trample women’s rights in favor of the nebulous personhood rights of fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses. These nebulous personhood rights even include the right of a fetus to be free from any potential harm in utero. Accordingly, women who engage in stigmatized behavior—like drug or alcohol use—are finding themselves incarcerated and arrested, charged under fetal homicide laws that were specifically not intended to criminalize their behavior or punish them.

    Rest - https://pjmedia.com/faith/unborn-vic...man-texas-law/
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  2. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,811
    Thanks (Given)
    34243
    Thanks (Received)
    26347
    Likes (Given)
    2312
    Likes (Received)
    9910
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    Good, it's a start, and should be recognized as so everywhere.

    ---

    Unborn Victim of Church Shooting Recognized as Fully Human Under Texas Law

    When the gunman walked into the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas, he reportedly targeted children. His youngest victim was a baby who had yet to be born. Under Texas law, if the murderer had lived, he would have faced a murder charge for the killing of the unborn baby.

    Quoting National Right to Life, "Under a [Texas] law signed June 20, 2003, and effective September 1, 2003, the protections of the entire criminal code extend to 'an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.' The law does not apply to 'conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child' or to 'a lawful medical procedure performed by a physican or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent.'"

    Even though the Texas feticide law doesn't extend to mothers who legally abort their babies, pro-abortion advocates still despise the law.

    An article published in 2014 at Rewire complained:

    The rush to establish "personhood" and the enthusiasm for protecting fetuses above all else has perverted the stated purpose of fetal homicide laws. Once intended to protect fetuses and provide to pregnant women and their families a legal remedy for wrongful death, fetal homicide laws are being misused by overzealous prosecutors and judges to trample women’s rights in favor of the nebulous personhood rights of fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses. These nebulous personhood rights even include the right of a fetus to be free from any potential harm in utero. Accordingly, women who engage in stigmatized behavior—like drug or alcohol use—are finding themselves incarcerated and arrested, charged under fetal homicide laws that were specifically not intended to criminalize their behavior or punish them.

    Rest - https://pjmedia.com/faith/unborn-vic...man-texas-law/
    Too bad for the bad guys. If you murder a pregnant woman and the baby she is carrying and her intent was to carry through birth, you get the double whammy here. Two capital murder murder charges.

    And we really don't give a damn what pro-abortion advocates think. They can just suck on it
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    12,767
    Thanks (Given)
    7712
    Thanks (Received)
    7683
    Likes (Given)
    817
    Likes (Received)
    2823
    Piss Off (Given)
    8
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19919858

    Default

    Scott Peterson was charged with double murder.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,811
    Thanks (Given)
    34243
    Thanks (Received)
    26347
    Likes (Given)
    2312
    Likes (Received)
    9910
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Diamond View Post
    Scott Peterson was charged with double murder.
    I don't recall which states do and don't count the unborn as a viable, separate victim. I know it does here because I voted for it.

    This came up as an issue in another state over the same, but I can't remember which one. There ARE states though where you'd have though Planned Parenthood wrote the law. If can't breathe, eat sleep and scream, doesn't count.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    12,767
    Thanks (Given)
    7712
    Thanks (Received)
    7683
    Likes (Given)
    817
    Likes (Received)
    2823
    Piss Off (Given)
    8
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19919858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I don't recall which states do and don't count the unborn as a viable, separate victim. I know it does here because I voted for it.

    This came up as an issue in another state over the same, but I can't remember which one. There ARE states though where you'd have though Planned Parenthood wrote the law. If can't breathe, eat sleep and scream, doesn't count.
    Peterson case was in California. Crazy a leftist hellhole ruling that way.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,811
    Thanks (Given)
    34243
    Thanks (Received)
    26347
    Likes (Given)
    2312
    Likes (Received)
    9910
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Diamond View Post
    Peterson case was in California. Crazy a leftist hellhole ruling that way.
    I think most states do if the mother's intent was to keep the child. I think it became an issue in a state where it was not specified.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums