it appears that in a sense, i am right. When the constitution refers to the 3 coequal branches of government, when referring to the judicial branch, it means the
supreme court, but... But... It appears congress has the say as to whether or not a lower, "federal" court, has the authority to allow a lower circuit court to override a directive or eo from the president of the united states... Or am i reading this wrong?
article iii.
section. 1.
the judicial power of the united states, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts as the congress may from time to time ordain and establish. the judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-do...ion-transcript
Originally Posted by high_plains_drifter
it appears that in a sense, i am right. When the constitution refers to the 3 coequal branches of government, when referring to the judicial branch, it means the supreme court, but... But... It appears congress has the say as to whether or not a lower, "federal" court, has the authority to allow a lower circuit court to override a directive or eo from the president of the united states... Or am i reading this wrong?
Reply With Quote