Results 1 to 12 of 12

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Diamond View Post
    That's a bold statement.
    Agreed, I've seen a lot of severely impaired psychotics back in the old days. Word salad.

    Gravy can write full sentences. This is good.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284557

    Default

    Anyway ---- I didn't read the Oprah speech. Did she really call for the rise of trannies?

    The New York Post, a conservative paper, did one of its famous one-word headlines today --- we saw it in the supermarket. "NOPRAH" it read.

    It must have been some speech, at least for desperate Dems. Her --- partner --- not husband, which will be a problem if this goes on --- said she's up for it, but the publicist later said he hadn't correctly heard the question. His name is Stedman Graham, which is a very white name, so I thought that could also be a problem for her, and looked him up. He's a very distinguished looking man, which would help, but he is a light-skinned black. So that's politically all right for her. Oprah is 63, a good age for this sort of thing, even in a few years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums