Libs Want To Bring Back The Unfairness Doctrine

[Dilloduck]

How the liberal media spins how a peace loving anti war peace nik shows his love and admiration toward a wounded Iarq war vet

Perhaps if talk radio and Fox News did not exist it would be something like this......


Babykilling Fascist Spits on Peace Activist
You can "support the troops", but not the war. And if in the process of "supporting the troops" you succeed in encouraging those they are fighting against, well then that's their own damn problem. So it was in that spirit that thousands of peace activists converged on the nation’s capitol last weekend in what future poets will one day describe as an "overflowing septic tank of love". In contrast, about three counter-protesters showed up to antagonize the crowd by making disparaging remarks about the beautiful and talented Jane Fonda. One of those freeper brownshirts was none other than our old friend Josh “Can’t Take a Joke” Sparling, a wounded war criminal and brainwashed propagandist for the Bush Junta.

While the American Hero Ehren Watada will likely spend the rest of his life at Gitmo for having the courage to abandon his fellow soldiers on the field of battle, Sparling has become a jingoist poster boy for the military-industrial complex. A glutton for media attention, he's been selling his bull on every morning talk show for the past week, taking valuable air time away from Mother Cindy and the Joisey Grrlz. He obviously has no shame. Yet when a peace activist hocked a wad of soul-cleansing loogie in his general direction, Sparling actually returned fire.

Thankfully, the Nazi was too slow on the draw. The nimble-footed protester had already vanished in a cloud of marijuana smoke and patchouli, perhaps off to graffiti the Washington Monument in the hopes of beefing up his arrest record for a future teaching job at Berkeley. The right-wing media has been fixated on the story all week, using the incident to paint peace activists in a bad light and perpetuate the myth that we all hate the babykilling troops. However, it was Sparling’s vicious attack that betrayed a fundamental lack of respect for the millions of brave men, womyn, and transgendered progressives who fight every day to end the war and bring our tots home in shame and defeat before they can mishandle any more Qurans.

As for the valiant protester who supposedly spat at but not on Sparling (there’s a difference), he gave up a day of playing Gears of War on his Xbox 360 to take a stand against violence and aggression. Instead of whining about a little good-natured ribbing, Sparling should get down on his good knee and thank him for his noble sacrifice.

http://blamebush.typepad.com/

You can't get it through your head that we're all slaves to what less than reputable people tell us in the media, can you?

[red states rule]

Slaves only if the Dems get their way

That is what we are fighting against

[Dilloduck]

Slaves only if the Dems get their way

That is what we are fighting against

I doubt there is a person here who can live without submitting to the will of others.

[red states rule]

The examples of liberal bias are endless


ABC Shows President Bush Hitting CEO Pay, But Not Defending Tax Cuts
Posted by Ken Shepherd on February 1, 2007 - 17:38.
Yesterday, President Bush became the second sitting president to ever take a stroll on the New York Stock Exchange floor (Ronald Reagan was the first to do so). Bush also gave a speech at Federal Hall in which he defended his tax cuts, as well as No Child Left Behind, and his policy initiatives in general. But his policy remarks got no attention last night on the evening newscasts, which instead hyped his talking points on CEO pay and income inequality, two liberal themes.


I wrote more about that here. Here's an excerpt:


...network reporters downplayed the good economic news – particularly ABC’s Betsy Stark, who highlighted liberal-sounding applause lines in the president’s Wall Street speech on the “state of the economy” while leaving out the president’s defense of his tax cuts.

CBS’s Katie Couric and NBC’s Brian Williams both briefly addressed the economy’s strong growth rate and the president’s speech, but ABC’s "World News" was the only program among the three New York-based newscasts to offer viewers a fully packaged story on Bush’s "state of the economy report."

"It’s hard to imagine a warmer reception" than how stock exchange traders greeted Bush on the floor of the NYSE, ABC’s Stark conceded. But, she added, "his message to the nation’s leading capitalists was laced with tough love" as he warned corporations to pay executives based on merit and performance.

Following Bush’s remarks on CEO pay, which sounded similar to the media’s usual shock and awe at corporate salaries, Stark said, "For the first time in a high profile way," Bush "acknowledged that not everyone has shared equally in the recent economic prosperity."


But while the clip Stark aired featured the president saying "income inequality is real," Bush immediately added that "the question is whether we respond to the income equality we see with policies that help lift people up or tear others down."

Yet rather than informing her audience of the policies the president favors related to income, Stark turned her attention to casting doubt on the economy’s overall health.

The new GDP number “bolstered the perception of economic success,” she said, but “for now, though, a majority of Americans have another view” as “most say they disapprove of his management of the economy, despite these good numbers.”

http://newsbusters.org/node/10556

[TheSage]

which republicans are on the record as being opposed to the fairness doctrine?

The neocons will be for censorship too, now that their globalist agenda is too obvious to deny.

McCain has been against free speech ever since the McCain feingold abomination.

[red states rule]

which republicans are on the record as being opposed to the fairness doctrine?

The neocons will be for censorship too, now that their globalist agenda is too obvious to deny.

McCain has been against free speech ever since the McCain feingold abomination.

Most republicans are opposed to the Unfairness Doctrine. When there is free speech, the libs lose everytime

This is the reason libs need the Unfainess Doctrine, they need to silence conservatives so only the liberal message will get through

[TheSage]

Most republicans are opposed to the Unfairness Doctrine. When there is free speech, the libs lose everytime

This is the reason libs need the Unfainess Doctrine, they need to silence conservatives so only the liberal message will get through

WHich elected republican is even talking about this?

[red states rule]

WHich elected republican is even talking about this?

Since the space cadet Dennis Kucinich has not btought it to the floor, none. But when Dennis the Menace does you will here from them

[TheSage]

Since the space cadet Dennis Kucinich has not btought it to the floor, none. But when Dennis the Menace does you will here from them

We'll see. Neocons are not really for free speech anymore now that their anti-american globalist plan are laid bare for all to see.

[red states rule]

We'll see. Neocons are not really for free speech anymore now that their anti-american globalist plan are laid bare for all to see. You can see this on our very own board where the so called conservatives ban people for telling the truth.

It seems it is the libs who want to shut down free speech.

Unless of course it is liberal free speech

Dennis the Menace is calling this "Media Reform". Sounds like the old Soviet Union

[TheSage]

It seems it is the libs who want to shut down free speech.

Unless of course it is liberal free speech

Dennis the Menace is calling this "Media Reform". Sounds like the old Soviet Union

And it seems the refuglies are willing to go along with it.

Where is bush on this? Isn't he willing to stretch the limits of presidential power on this one? No. He'll only do that join the U.S. with mexico and canada and erase our borders.

[red states rule]

And it seems the refuglies are willing to go along with it.

Where is bush on this? Isn't he willing to stretch the limits of presidential power on this one? No. He'll only do that join the U.S. with mexico and canada and erase our borders.

Pres Bush has more important things to do then deal with Dennis the Menace

Libs own 99% of the media, and yet they fell they must silence Rush, Sean, and O'Reilly

The NY Times ran 12 front page stories on Air America BEFORE it went on the air. Now, it is all but dead because people choose not to listen to their rants

Libs cannot compete on a level playing field with conservatives, so now Dennis the Menace wants to change the rules

It seems you have no problem with the liberal media having total control and slanting the news to their viewpoints

[TheSage]

Pres Bush has more important things to do then deal with Dennis the Menace

Libs own 99% of the media, and yet they fell they must silence Rush, Sean, and O'Reilly

The NY Times ran 12 front page stories on Air America BEFORE it went on the air. Now, it is all but dead because people choose not to listen to their rants

Libs cannot compete on a level playing field with conservatives, so now Dennis the Menace wants to change the rules

It seems you have no problem with the liberal media having total control and slanting the news to their viewpoints

It seems you're in denial about the actual priorities of republicans. When bush REALLY wants something, he makes it so. Free speech is just not really something he cares about. This is not about dennis kucinich. Look how you're willing to downplay the issue now that you're trying to reconcile the obvious unwillingness of people you respect to do something about it. You brainwash yourself so your handlers don't have to. A real automaton you turned out to be.

[red states rule]

Why not enlighten us. What are the "real priorities" of Republicans?

[Dilloduck]

Pres Bush has more important things to do then deal with Dennis the Menace

Libs own 99% of the media, and yet they fell they must silence Rush, Sean, and O'Reilly

The NY Times ran 12 front page stories on Air America BEFORE it went on the air. Now, it is all but dead because people choose not to listen to their rants

Libs cannot compete on a level playing field with conservatives, so now Dennis the Menace wants to change the rules

It seems you have no problem with the liberal media having total control and slanting the news to their viewpoints

Are you under the impression that politicians care what people really think or want?