I don't think so. But using the model of most "rings " as seems to be in fashion today.
starr was seven titles including the first two Super Bowls.
that makes him better than Montana and Brady.
I don't think so. But using the model of most "rings " as seems to be in fashion today.
starr was seven titles including the first two Super Bowls.
that makes him better than Montana and Brady.
That's a point. The ring is earned as a team. An individual can be a great talent surrounded by lesser players, or have seasons full of injuries, resulting in fewer rings.
After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
I'm a packer fan, but no, starr is not the best ever
The "Best Quarterback Ever" is the quarterback in your mind that made you happy when you watched football. Eons ago when it was a real game.
Anyway, there is no best quarterback ever and never will be. Terry Bradshaw was my favorite quarterback and he was WAY far from the best
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
You're REALLY digging through some O-L-D threads.
I liked a lot of QBs/players for a variety of reasons. QBs depend a lot on the team around them, and again, who you liked when you watched the game. I outgrew pro football when I was a teen. Loosely followed/take-it-or-leave-it since.
I boycotted last year, and will continue to do so as long as players are allowed to "protest anyway".
Younger people tend to forget that the NFL existed before them. Hell, Roman Gabriel wouldn't know how to play in today's QB protected game. He couldn't complete a pass without at least 3 guys hanging off him.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke