View Poll Results: What do you think will be the outcome of Kim-Trump Summit?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Genuine denuclearisation of North Korea achieved

    0 0%
  • Trump will be the 3rd US President to fall for North Korea's trap

    0 0%
  • Both sides will walk away empty-handed

    2 100.00%
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    259
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    33
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37824

    Default North Korea's deafening silence on denuclearisation

    According to South Korea's national security adviser, Chung Eui-yong, "The North made clear its willingness for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, and made clear that there is no reason to own nuclear (programmes) if military threats towards the North are cleared and the security of its regime is guaranteed."

    Kim Jong Un "made clear that achieving denuclearisation is his father's dying wish and that it has not been changed at all", according to a South Korean official who was speaking anonymously to the country's Yonhap news agency.

    The US must take note of the following "suspicious behaviours" of North Korea prior to the summit:

    (a) Kim did not personally invite Trump to the summit but did it indirectly through a South Korean envoy. This shows that he has no respect for Trump. Neither was the "invitation" diplomatically correct, courteous or sincere.

    (b) In a commentary published Wednesday, 21 March 2018, North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) noted a “sign of change” in US-North Korea relations but mentioned nothing about the summit or denuclearisation.

    (c) So far North Korea has been keeping a deafening silence about the Kim-Trump summit, not to mention Kim Jong-il's dying wish and Kim Jong-un's willingness for denuclearisation. South Korea has become the spokesman or mouthpiece for the North in passing the messages to the US. Hence it won't be difficult to imagine how Kim would respond to Trump's demand for North Korea's denuclearisation during the upcoming summit:

    "Denuclearisation? What denuclearisation? Don't frighten me! I have never said anything about denuclearisation, not even in my sleep talking. So don't put words into my mouth! My principal position is that I will never agree to any talks in which my country's nuclear weapons will be the subject of negotiations.

    If your country wishes to live safely, it must abandon its hostile policy towards the DPRK and learn to co-exist with my country that has nuclear weapons and should wake up from its pipe dream of our country giving up nuclear weapons which we have developed and completed through all kinds of hardships.

    This fact that you are trying so hard to achieve my participation of the summit clearly reveals your wicked intent of leading me into giving up nuclear weapons. Your country should carefully consider how its ill-mannered behaviours can bring shameful results. Do you think I am a moron or dotard like you to abandon a very important project which my country has spent so much money and taken almost 70 years to achieve?"

    Poster's conclusion: In view of North Korea's longstanding vow that it will never abandon its nuclear programme, the sky would be falling if genuine denuclearisation of North Korea could be achieved in the Kim-Trump Summit. Even if the summit falls apart, crafty Kim will walk away with his newfound status as a global statesman on par with the leader of a supposedly sole superpower, especially in the eyes of his own people.

    https://nypost.com/2018/03/06/be-war...rds-diplomacy/

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/talks-...s_2409372.html

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.e1cee2ba891a

    http://video.foxnews.com/v/575564246...#sp=show-clips

    https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/world...cid=spartandhp

    http://iran-daily.com/News/202243.html

    http://www.ibtimes.com/north-korea-s...-dream-2632838

    https://m.cnn.com/en/article/h_57358...335b59cf17224b

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/10/p...ift/index.html

    https://mg.co.za/article/2008-10-13-...-nuclear-uturn

    http://www.dandelionlearning.co.uk/d...ken_Licken.pdf
    Last edited by reedak; 03-22-2018 at 01:11 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    At your Six
    Posts
    16,429
    Thanks (Given)
    24430
    Thanks (Received)
    11203
    Likes (Given)
    6054
    Likes (Received)
    4653
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13945536

    Default

    "....I got this ...dont worry about it....and dont depend on the butt-hurt "media fools"



  3. Thanks Drummond thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums