Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    18,758
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475234

    Default Kneeling for systemic oppression of Men.

    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...jail-time.html

    In the us, there is no debters prison. Unless you're a man and you owe spousal extortion.


    Former “Dukes of Hazzard” and “Smallville” star John Schneider is facing some jail time over unpaid spousal support.
    According to TMZ, Schneider has been ordered by a judge to serve some light jail time for at least a few days after not paying his estranged wife, Elvira Castle. The outlet reports he’ll spend three days in Los Angeles County jail for not paying up for delinquent alimony that he owed.
    As previously reported, Schneider was taken to court over the spousal support in February of 2018. At the time, he claimed that he was unable to pay because his income isn’t sufficient to make the payments. He claimed that he has hit hard financial times and spent most of his money repairing his movie studio in Louisiana after it was destroyed in a March 2016 flood.
    “… the greatest detractor from high performance is fear: fear that you are not prepared, fear that you are in over your head, fear that you are not worthy, and ultimately, fear of failure. If you can eliminate that fear—not through arrogance or just wishing difficulties away, but through hard work and preparation—you will put yourself in an incredibly powerful position to take on the challenges you face" - Pete Carroll.

  2. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darin View Post
    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...jail-time.html

    In the us, there is no debters prison. Unless you're a man and you owe spousal extortion.


    Former “Dukes of Hazzard” and “Smallville” star John Schneider is facing some jail time over unpaid spousal support.
    According to TMZ, Schneider has been ordered by a judge to serve some light jail time for at least a few days after not paying his estranged wife, Elvira Castle. The outlet reports he’ll spend three days in Los Angeles County jail for not paying up for delinquent alimony that he owed.
    As previously reported, Schneider was taken to court over the spousal support in February of 2018. At the time, he claimed that he was unable to pay because his income isn’t sufficient to make the payments. He claimed that he has hit hard financial times and spent most of his money repairing his movie studio in Louisiana after it was destroyed in a March 2016 flood.
    True, the courts are very tough on the men that fall into hard financial times. Always seem very reluctant to lower the original child support payment amount, even when the man paying income has drastically fallen .
    Add that to the fact that a woman can lie and cry abuse and the cop showing up to the scene will automatically take her word for it and arrest the man tho' he is innocent.
    Sad but true, law enforcement and the court both place the female's words above that of the man, as if the man is always guilty.
    And some judges are hardcore in favor of aiding/supporting the woman regardless of her being the true guilty party.
    I have seen it with my own eyes, several times in regards to my older brother and his now ex-wife. She lied like a damn rug after attacking him and getting him arrested. She once attacked him and hit him in the head with a coke bottle, called the cops and they arrested him instead of her!
    She lied and he was the one bleeding but they took him to jail.
    Damn old judge when it went to court , gave him a lecture and warned him about being violent to women!!
    As if women are absolutely incapable of ever being violent towards men!--Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26443
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9982
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    True, the courts are very tough on the men that fall into hard financial times. Always seem very reluctant to lower the original child support payment amount, even when the man paying income has drastically fallen .
    Add that to the fact that a woman can lie and cry abuse and the cop showing up to the scene will automatically take her word for it and arrest the man tho' he is innocent.
    Sad but true, law enforcement and the court both place the female's words above that of the man, as if the man is always guilty.
    And some judges are hardcore in favor of aiding/supporting the woman regardless of her being the true guilty party.
    I have seen it with my own eyes, several times in regards to my older brother and his now ex-wife. She lied like a damn rug after attacking him and getting him arrested. She once attacked him and hit him in the head with a coke bottle, called the cops and they arrested him instead of her!
    She lied and he was the one bleeding but they took him to jail.
    Damn old judge when it went to court , gave him a lecture and warned him about being violent to women!!
    As if women are absolutely incapable of ever being violent towards men!--Tyr
    They're REAL quick to to raise the amount if the guy hits paydirt though. Even if the ex had ZERO to do with the success.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, High_Plains_Drifter thanked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    Bull bleeping bleep.
    Some of you guys are starting to sound like tailfins. Oppressed and trodden on by your dictatorial former spouses. The violins get so loud at times that we can hardly hear.
    Sorry guys, but when you get married and have kids, you have entered into an financial agreement that you can not back away from. It doesn't matter how long you were married, how long you have been apart, how much you earned then or how much you earn now. You owe your share to your family, because they are still there.
    For every responsible former spouse, there are deadbeat dads who try to game the system. This is what prejudices the courts to make settlements.
    Keep in mind that the mothers are normally entrusted with the kids. Being a single mom is a lot different than being a freewheeling carousing former dad.
    You owe what you owe. It's incentive to try to make your relationship work.
    You guys should have paid more attention to your marriage vows. To death do you part. Otherwise, you part with a lot.

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26443
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9982
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Bull bleeping bleep.
    Some of you guys are starting to sound like tailfins. Oppressed and trodden on by your dictatorial former spouses. The violins get so loud at times that we can hardly hear.
    Sorry guys, but when you get married and have kids, you have entered into an financial agreement that you can not back away from. It doesn't matter how long you were married, how long you have been apart, how much you earned then or how much you earn now. You owe your share to your family, because they are still there.
    For every responsible former spouse, there are deadbeat dads who try to game the system. This is what prejudices the courts to make settlements.
    Keep in mind that the mothers are normally entrusted with the kids. Being a single mom is a lot different than being a freewheeling carousing former dad.
    You owe what you owe. It's incentive to try to make your relationship work.
    You guys should have paid more attention to your marriage vows. To death do you part. Otherwise, you part with a lot.
    And for every deadbeat dad trying to game the system, there's a sociopathic, opportunistic woman doing the same.

    Try again. Victim.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  8. Thanks Elessar thanked this post
  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26443
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9982
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Oh. I believe the OP is about spousal support. Not child support. There's a BIG difference.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  10. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Bull bleeping bleep.
    Some of you guys are starting to sound like tailfins. Oppressed and trodden on by your dictatorial former spouses. The violins get so loud at times that we can hardly hear.
    Sorry guys, but when you get married and have kids, you have entered into an financial agreement that you can not back away from. It doesn't matter how long you were married, how long you have been apart, how much you earned then or how much you earn now. You owe your share to your family, because they are still there.
    For every responsible former spouse, there are deadbeat dads who try to game the system. This is what prejudices the courts to make settlements.
    Keep in mind that the mothers are normally entrusted with the kids. Being a single mom is a lot different than being a freewheeling carousing former dad.
    You owe what you owe. It's incentive to try to make your relationship work.
    You guys should have paid more attention to your marriage vows. To death do you part. Otherwise, you part with a lot.
    My post first dealt with the cops and the courts being prejudice in favor of women(especially in cases were they claim violence was used to harm them).
    My comments on courts/ judges/child support were not about me, my divorce, as I got custody of my daughter and I got paid child support by my (soon to be) ex-wife- which by the way, I never sought any increase from her.
    Marriage vows eh??
    So the guy is always the guilty one yet again, eh?
    Wives simply never cheat huh, ?
    Some guys when they find out the wife is unfaithful refuse to stay with her- or is that to be condemned too?
    When husbands are the cheater, the going flavor/advice given to the wife is -- "" hun, just divorce the cheating bastard.""
    Sorry Gabs, but your comment and accusation illustrates the mindset and bias that I spoke about, IMHO..-TYR
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  11. Thanks Elessar thanked this post
  12. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    18,758
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Oh. I believe the OP is about spousal support. Not child support. There's a BIG difference.

    Child support will never be fair until the recipient has to account for (even HALF of) the dollars she receives.
    “… the greatest detractor from high performance is fear: fear that you are not prepared, fear that you are in over your head, fear that you are not worthy, and ultimately, fear of failure. If you can eliminate that fear—not through arrogance or just wishing difficulties away, but through hard work and preparation—you will put yourself in an incredibly powerful position to take on the challenges you face" - Pete Carroll.

  13. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
  14. #9
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Podunk, WI
    Posts
    9,836
    Thanks (Given)
    4248
    Thanks (Received)
    4521
    Likes (Given)
    4519
    Likes (Received)
    2812
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    There should not even be such a thing as "spousal support." You get divorced, fine, move on with your life and support your own damn self. Your privileges as a spouse are over.
    Last edited by High_Plains_Drifter; 06-14-2018 at 10:40 AM.

  15. Thanks Elessar thanked this post
    Likes NT'sGirl liked this post
  16. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26443
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9982
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darin View Post
    Child support will never be fair until the recipient has to account for (even HALF of) the dollars she receives.
    I have ZERO problem with that. Had a GF once thought she hit jackpot with child support and treated it like it was hers. She DID care for the children, but her ability to spend on herself went WAY up. Gave her a REALLY big head as well.

    I don't know if it's a difference in individual State law, or just the times, but I was under the impression the person receiving support DID have to account for expenditures.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  17. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Mouth of the Rogue River, Oregon USA
    Posts
    9,585
    Thanks (Given)
    8103
    Thanks (Received)
    7926
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1560
    Piss Off (Given)
    3
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19808674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Bull bleeping bleep.
    Some of you guys are starting to sound like tailfins. Oppressed and trodden on by your dictatorial former spouses. The violins get so loud at times that we can hardly hear.
    Sorry guys, but when you get married and have kids, you have entered into an financial agreement that you can not back away from. It doesn't matter how long you were married, how long you have been apart, how much you earned then or how much you earn now. You owe your share to your family, because they are still there.
    For every responsible former spouse, there are deadbeat dads who try to game the system. This is what prejudices the courts to make settlements.
    Keep in mind that the mothers are normally entrusted with the kids. Being a single mom is a lot different than being a freewheeling carousing former dad.
    You owe what you owe. It's incentive to try to make your relationship work.
    You guys should have paid more attention to your marriage vows. To death do you part. Otherwise, you part with a lot.
    The OP smacked a homer on this one, Gabby.

    Do you think all women are saints? Well, show me a person that says they are 'perfect', and I will invite them to kiss
    my ass in the LA Coliseum and and give them week to sell tickets to the event!

    What about a woman who walks out on her husband and child AS MY EX DID?
    What about a woman that would not go to her regular job, but instead was found by me
    (she left clues) wearing a bikini, wrapped around a pole in a strip joint in downtown LA?

    What about a woman who left home for 3 days until I tracked her down up in Victorville?

    All of this and more while I was still working 12 hour watches at the Command Center.

    What about a woman that physically attacked me in a drunken rage?

    What about a woman who, in her divorce papers, accused me of a lifelong Cocaine habit?
    I had a TS/SSBI Clearance while at USCG District 11 Command Center in Long Beach.
    I would have lost my career - WHICH IS WHAT SHE SAID SHE WAS TRYING TO DO?

    Marriage Vows go BOTH WAYS, Gabby.

    You are so full of shit!
    I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?

    "I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"

    A Deplorable!

  18. Thanks High_Plains_Drifter thanked this post
    Likes High_Plains_Drifter liked this post
  19. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Mouth of the Rogue River, Oregon USA
    Posts
    9,585
    Thanks (Given)
    8103
    Thanks (Received)
    7926
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1560
    Piss Off (Given)
    3
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19808674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    And for every deadbeat dad trying to game the system, there's a sociopathic, opportunistic woman doing the same.

    Try again. Victim.
    Yeah.

    Gabby is our 'resident expert' on marriage and society in general.
    I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?

    "I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"

    A Deplorable!

  20. Thanks High_Plains_Drifter thanked this post
    Likes High_Plains_Drifter liked this post
  21. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5355
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Hey guys .... this is another side to the story for some of us ex wives.

    When 1st hubby and I split there was no child support either way and no spousal either way. He made more, employer provided house and auto for him. But I just wanted to move forward and have no more contention. We had joint custody of one child and she could live with either of us.

    2nd hubby came into marriage making less than I. Our JOINT funds paid his ex her spousal and child support. Our JOINT funds also paid off their debt because she filed bankruptcy on her portion. Our JOINT funds put him through school. He retired as E9 with 30 years service 2 months after our divorce was final.

    Guess what? I still made more money and he wanted spousal (we went to court to settle) while he went back to school for two years. My lawyer reminded him about how my income helped pay off his previous life debts. Lawyer wanted to know if it would be worth it to do an accounting between what I contributed and what he would get. Plus, I retired frim full time work soon thereafter.

    Not all women are out to get you.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  22. Likes High_Plains_Drifter, NT'sGirl liked this post
  23. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SassyLady View Post
    Hey guys .... this is another side to the story for some of us ex wives.

    When 1st hubby and I split there was no child support either way and no spousal either way. He made more, employer provided house and auto for him. But I just wanted to move forward and have no more contention. We had joint custody of one child and she could live with either of us.

    2nd hubby came into marriage making less than I. Our JOINT funds paid his ex her spousal and child support. Our JOINT funds also paid off their debt because she filed bankruptcy on her portion. Our JOINT funds put him through school. He retired as E9 with 30 years service 2 months after our divorce was final.

    Guess what? I still made more money and he wanted spousal (we went to court to settle) while he went back to school for two years. My lawyer reminded him about how my income helped pay off his previous life debts. Lawyer wanted to know if it would be worth it to do an accounting between what I contributed and what he would get. Plus, I retired frim full time work soon thereafter.

    Not all women are out to get you.
    That old song, “What I Did For Love” comes to mind.

    As usual, Sassy is da woman.
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  24. Likes SassyLady liked this post
  25. #15
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Podunk, WI
    Posts
    9,836
    Thanks (Given)
    4248
    Thanks (Received)
    4521
    Likes (Given)
    4519
    Likes (Received)
    2812
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SassyLady View Post
    Hey guys .... this is another side to the story for some of us ex wives.

    When 1st hubby and I split there was no child support either way and no spousal either way. He made more, employer provided house and auto for him. But I just wanted to move forward and have no more contention. We had joint custody of one child and she could live with either of us.

    2nd hubby came into marriage making less than I. Our JOINT funds paid his ex her spousal and child support. Our JOINT funds also paid off their debt because she filed bankruptcy on her portion. Our JOINT funds put him through school. He retired as E9 with 30 years service 2 months after our divorce was final.

    Guess what? I still made more money and he wanted spousal (we went to court to settle) while he went back to school for two years. My lawyer reminded him about how my income helped pay off his previous life debts. Lawyer wanted to know if it would be worth it to do an accounting between what I contributed and what he would get. Plus, I retired frim full time work soon thereafter.

    Not all women are out to get you.
    When I divorced my first wife I was in the Air Force. The judge in Milwaukee ordered MORE monthly child support than I MADE. Evidently "she" thought I was a General or something. I went through hell getting it reduced down to what it should be and willfully initiated a monthly check be sent to the state. I hadn't paid close enough attention to my LES and didn't notice that for years I was paying DOUBLE because the court had also ordered a mandatory withholding. I tried and tried to have that money applied to what I had already paid to no avail. I paid double, and as far as the state of Wisconsin was concerned, that was all just fine and dandy, and I still paid until the kid was nineteen. The state of Wisconsin bought her a trailer, gave her food stamps and a monthly welfare check while she dealt drugs on the side and smoked enough dope to get a whale high.

    I just try to forget about the whole thing.
    Last edited by High_Plains_Drifter; 06-12-2018 at 09:25 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums