Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default Boris Johnson .. Burkha wearers look like letterboxes

    Boris Johnson is the UK's former Foreign Secretary and London Mayor. He has a habit of being 'controversial' from time to time. He's a diehard Conservative (& actually born in New York ..).

    He just made some comments that are causing a storm over here. What's true of political correctness in the UK, how far it's gone, can be judged from this current furore ....

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45114368

    Former foreign secretary Boris Johnson is facing growing criticism over his remark that Muslim women wearing the burka "look like letter boxes".

    Dominic Grieve, the ex-attorney general, said he would quit the party if Mr Johnson became leader.

    Ex-Tory chairwoman Baroness Warsi said his remarks could trigger a rise in hate crime.

    Senior Tories have urged him to apologise but Mr Johnson has not done so, and has stood by his comments.

    In a Daily Telegraph article, he said full-face veils should not be banned, but it was "absolutely ridiculous" women chose to "go around looking like letter boxes". He also compared them to looking like "bank robbers".

    A source close to the former London mayor has said: "We must not fall into the trap of shutting down the debate on difficult issues.

    "We have to call it out. If we fail to speak up for liberal values then we are simply yielding ground to reactionaries and extremists."

    But, speaking on BBC Radio 4's The World at One, Mr Grieve - a former Remain campaigner who has previously clashed with Mr Johnson over Brexit - said his behaviour was "very embarrassing".

    Mr Grieve said he would "without the slightest doubt", quit the Tories if Mr Johnson became leader, "because I don't regard him as a fit and proper person to lead a political party".

    Earlier Culture Secretary Jeremy Wright said there was no reason not to have a "robust conversation" about the subject, but added: "We're not talking to our friends in the pub. We are public figures and we have an additional obligation to be careful."

    A former Tory chairman, Lord Pickles, said Mr Johnson, who was foreign secretary until resigning last month over Brexit, risked "closing down" the debate with his "illiberal language".

    Supporters of Mr Johnson say the row is politically-motivated and that other senior Tories have made similar remarks without such criticism.

    Writing in the Guardian, Baroness Warsi said Mr Johnson's remarks were "indefensible" and "have no place in the modern Conservative Party".

    She said, although he was setting out a liberal position on the burka, he was doing it in an "alt-right" way, and using Muslim women as "political fodder… to stake out a leadership bid".

    "Johnson's words… send out a message that Muslim women are fair game," she wrote.

    Baroness Warsi was the first Muslim woman to sit in a British cabinet.

    But mother-of-seven Tahira Noor, who has been wearing a burka for 20 years, said it was "100% my choice" and Mr Johnson's comments showed a "lack of knowledge".

    She told BBC Radio 5 Live: "In today's day and age, the majority of the women who wear the burka are born and brought up in this country, are educated in this country, they've been to colleges, universities, and have understood why they want to do what they're doing.

    "They're under no oppression, they're not doing it because their husbands want them to or their fathers want them to."

    Ms Noor has four daughters and none of them wear a burka.

    "I haven't forced my daughters into it because I don't have to," she said. "It's not a must, it's not an obligation."

    Boris Johnson 'has caused offence', PM says ...

    Mr Johnson's former adviser Munira Mirza said Mr Johnson's views on the burka had been "entirely consistent" and other Conservative politicians had expressed the same view, without being called Islamophobic.

    In 2013 former Justice Secretary Ken Clarke - who also opposed a ban on the public wearing of burkas - said they should not be worn while giving evidence in court. He referred to burkas as a "peculiar costume" and a "kind of bag".

    Ms Mirza said: "The reality is there is a political fight here.

    "People who frankly couldn't care less about the issues that Muslim women face are piling into Boris because Boris said it."

    Last year, Zaynab Hussein, a mother from Leicester, was left fighting for her life after a man she didn't know smashed into her with his car - and then ran over her again. She was attacked because she was a Muslim.

    Tell Mama, the national organisation that collects anti-Muslim attack statistics, says that the majority of street victims of such abuse and violence are women, for the same reason that Mrs Hussein was singled out: some Muslim women are easily identifiable by their mode of dress - and therefore easy to target.

    Seven years ago Baroness Warsi said prejudice against Muslims had passed the "dinner table test".

    And Mr Johnson's critics regard his "letter box" and "bank robber" comments as part of the problem the peer defined: normalising prejudice and dehumanising women, rather than calmly debating the complexities of the veil in an open society.

    Since Baroness Warsi's warning, there has been the launch of a cross-departmental working group to tackle anti-Muslim hate.

    But it has been criticised as toothless, not least because the government can't agree a definition for Islamophobia.

    What Boris Johnson said:

    In his Daily Telegraph column, Mr Johnson - who last month quit the government in protest at Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit policy - was commenting on the introduction of a burka ban in Denmark.

    He said he felt "fully entitled" to expect women to remove face coverings when talking to him at his MP surgery - and schools and universities should be able to take the same approach if a student "turns up ... looking like a bank robber".

    "If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you," he said.

    "If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree - and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the Koran.

    "I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes."


    He said businesses and government agencies should be able to "enforce a dress code" that allowed them to see customers' faces.

    But he said: "Such restrictions are not quite the same as telling a free-born adult woman what she may or may not wear, in a public place, when she is simply minding her own business."

    He said a total ban on face-covering veils would give a boost to radicals who said there was a "clash of civilisations" between Islam and the West, and could lead to "a general crackdown on any public symbols of religious affiliation".
    Last edited by Drummond; 08-08-2018 at 08:57 AM.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  2. Thanks High_Plains_Drifter, Tyr-Ziu Saxnot thanked this post
    Likes Tyr-Ziu Saxnot liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Podunk, WI
    Posts
    9,836
    Thanks (Given)
    4248
    Thanks (Received)
    4521
    Likes (Given)
    4519
    Likes (Received)
    2812
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    There's more PROBLEMS on the planet from small social problems to all out killing that stem directly from the stone age cult we know as islam, than any other sort of thing ever.

    islam should be banned from all nations except known moslem sand pits. islam never has been nor will it ever be compatible with western culture and society. moslems don't assimilate where ever they go, they build up their numbers until they can impose their cult of death and subjugation on everyone else. This is not my opinion, this a fact, and no one should be told they can't speak the facts about islam. It needs to be said, it needs to be heard.





    Last edited by High_Plains_Drifter; 08-08-2018 at 10:10 AM.

  4. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, Drummond thanked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    Like this?

    Attached Images Attached Images
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  6. Likes High_Plains_Drifter, Drummond liked this post
  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Like this?

    ... Yep !!
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  8. Thanks Abbey Marie thanked this post
  9. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default Boris Johnson .. Burkha wearers look like letterboxes

    How surprising that Boris has chosen his words poorly.

    “Women chose to”
    Is really all that matters from the OP, if a woman freely choses to dress as she does. And sure people are free to pass comment -as they always will- about others appearance, but at the end of the day it comes down to your character as to what type of comment you will pass. I think the comments by Boris reflect poorly on his character.
    Last edited by Noir; 08-09-2018 at 06:33 AM.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    How surprising that Boris has chosen his words poorly.

    “Women chose to”
    Is really all that matters from the OP, if a woman freely choses to dress as she does. And sure people are free to pass comment -as they always will- about others appearance, but at the end of the day it comes down to your character as to what type of comment you will pass. I think the comments by Boris reflect poorly on his character.
    Yes ... you would. Then again, your political bias might tempt you to call him 'racist' if he bought an ice cream cone with a colour of ice cream not to your liking.

    You say he chose his words 'poorly' .. so, imagine yourself to be Boris J for a moment. You want to make a point, and you want to choose your words WELL. So. What words would YOU have used ?

    But in any case, ARE we free to walk around exactly as we want ? Women wearing burkhas hide their identity. Yes, they DO look like bank robbers ! If I wanted to rob a bank, wearing a burkha would be an excellent precaution against getting caught.

    That's aside from the cultural issue ... insisting that one's beliefs and persuasions are shoved down everyone's throats, in total disrespect of the culture you live in !!

    Nobody has total freedom to wear what they want. Try walking in the street, naked from the waist down. Or, try wearing a Nazi uniform outside a synagogue. See ?

    Fact is that you're choosing to oppose Boris, because you're specifically favouring the particular headdress he referred to, and all it represents. How very 'PC' of you.

    There are times, Noir, when a stand MUST be made. Sheer decency demands it.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  11. Likes High_Plains_Drifter liked this post
  12. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default Boris Johnson .. Burkha wearers look like letterboxes

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummond View Post
    You say he chose his words 'poorly' .. so, imagine yourself to be Boris J for a moment. You want to make a point, and you want to choose your words WELL. So. What words would YOU have used ?
    I’m giving Boris the benefit of the doubt that he chose his words poorly, under the understanding that he did not articulate well what he was thinking. If he did articulate his thoughts accurately, and so chose his words ‘well’ then that’s another matter

    But in any case, ARE we free to walk around exactly as we want ? Women wearing burkhas hide their identity. Yes, they DO look like bank robbers ! If I wanted to rob a bank, wearing a burkha would be an excellent precaution against getting caught.
    We are not free to walk around as we want, but we should be.

    That's aside from the cultural issue ... insisting that one's beliefs and persuasions are shoved down everyone's throats, in total disrespect of the culture you live in !!
    If you think that’s an issue, fair enough, I don’t, as a matter of free speech the government should not be restricting what you wear.

    Nobody has total freedom to wear what they want. Try walking in the street, naked from the waist down. Or, try wearing a Nazi uniform outside a synagogue. See ?
    IMO the nazi and the nudist should be free to wear what they please (or indeed not wear in the case of the nudist). If you want the government to place restrictions on clothing, fair enough, but I don’t see the justification.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    I’m giving Boris the benefit of the doubt that he chose his words poorly, under the understanding that he did not articulate well what he was thinking. If he did articulate his thoughts accurately, and so chose his words ‘well’ then that’s another matter
    ... yet, you offer no alternative wording. Surprise surprise.

    Be honest. You object to his commenting, AT ALL.

    We are not free to walk around as we want, but we should be.
    Then, make your 'principled stand' ... try the alternatives I listed previously. And, 'why not' ... if you literally mean what you say ?

    See where it gets you -- and, why.

    If you think that’s an issue, fair enough, I don’t, as a matter of free speech the government should not be restricting what you wear.
    Regardless of what it symbolises ? How it may offend ? Regardless of the abusive statement intended ? Tell me. Why do we 'not' have the right to be offended by burkhas ... but, we do, if a bunch of Nazis paraded down a city centre, complete with the wearing of full uniforms ?

    How DARE Jewish people mind that !!

    IMO the nazi and the nudist should be free to wear what they please (or indeed not wear in the case of the nudist). If you want the government to place restrictions on clothing, fair enough, but I don’t see the justification.
    I'd make this point. Our culture should mean SOMETHING. Burkhas are examples of people wearing clothing designed to be an 'in your face' statement of utter contempt for the different culture within which they are being worn.

    And, we did fight the Nazis. What they were. What they stood for. We recognised them as an enemy. Because, they WERE.

    Perhaps we should forget the lessons of the past, eh ? In the name of political correctness, let's all insult everyone else ...
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default Boris Johnson .. Burkha wearers look like letterboxes

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummond View Post
    ... yet, you offer no alternative wording. Surprise surprise.

    Be honest. You object to his commenting, AT ALL.
    I can not offer alternative wording without his motivations behind the statement. As I said I would rather offer him the benefit of poor wording rather than poor motivates.

    Then, make your 'principled stand' ... try the alternatives I listed previously. And, 'why not' ... if you literally mean what you say ?

    See where it gets you -- and, why.
    I do not believe that you believe the statement ‘if I don’t think something should be illegal, then I want to do it’ and if you do think that, I definitely do not.

    Regardless of what it symbolises ? How it may offend ? Regardless of the abusive statement intended ? Tell me. Why do we 'not' have the right to be offended by burkhas ... but, we do, if a bunch of Nazis paraded down a city centre, complete with the wearing of full uniforms ?

    How DARE Jewish people mind that !!
    Sure, be offended by both, but don’t let (or wish for) your government pass laws to try and prevent you being offended.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    I can not offer alternative wording without his motivations behind the statement. As I said I would rather offer him the benefit of poor wording rather than poor motivates.
    ... no, that won't do. You accused him of poor wording. Now, you've shifted to suddenly question his 'poor' motivation, and your second sentence suggests that poor wording is less of an issue than poor motivation.

    You hadn't made such a point until now. Sure you're not attacking Boris because his politics fails to be your own ?

    I do not believe that you believe the statement ‘if I don’t think something should be illegal, then I want to do it’ and if you do think that, I definitely do not.
    Indeed ?

    As an example: have I argued - AT ALL - for the questioning of laws in our debate ? It comes down to what we do, or do not, think acceptable clothing practice should be, out on the street, in public.

    Boris has actually NOT come out in favour of outlawing the Burkha. All he's done is criticise it. For that, he's being pilloried and attacked.

    You are one figure content to criticise him yourself.

    Interestingly, previously, you tried to make a 'freedom' argument. Well, how about Boris being free to criticise, but MINUS attacks on him, for daring to ?

    'PC' behaviour is undoubtedly one-sided, used to prop up a preferred status quo, and to instill the 'standard' insisted upon.

    Sure, be offended by both, but don’t let (or wish for) your government pass laws to try and prevent you being offended.
    Good. Boris is offended by the Burkha, and its 'letterbox' design. Let nobody push any legal imperative which tries to stop HIM being offended, and - in the name of free speech - expressing himself, as he sees fit.

    ..... AH .... BUT .... is that suddenly 'different', in Boris's case, because he's defied the inbuilt agenda of the 'PC' imperative he's expected to respect ? H'mmm ???

    One law, one accepted standard, for burkha-wearers ... another entirely for those daring to be openly critical of them .. ??

    'Funny' how this invariably works out, eh, Noir ?
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  16. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45130532

    Boris Johnson is facing a possible investigation into breaches of the Conservative Party code of conduct.

    The party has received dozens of complaints about the ex-foreign secretary's comments about Muslim women wearing burkas.

    The complaints will be looked at by an independent panel which could refer Mr Johnson to the party's board, which has the power to expel him.

    The party declined to comment on the details of the investigation.

    A Conservative Party spokesman said: "The code of conduct process is strictly confidential." A source close to Mr Johnson offered no comment.

    Mr Johnson has rejected calls to apologise for saying people wearing burkas looked like "letter boxes" or "bank robbers", in a Daily Telegraph column in which he also argued against a ban on full-face veils.

    Critics have accused him of stoking Islamophobia to boost his Tory leadership ambitions but his supporters have said he was speaking up for "liberal values".

    The Conservative Party has been accused of not doing enough to tackle anti-Muslim prejudice in its ranks, despite an initiative to boost tolerance and diversity.

    The party's code of conduct states that Tory officials and elected representatives must "lead by example to encourage and foster respect and tolerance" and not "use their position to bully, abuse, victimise, harass or unlawfully discriminate against others".

    The independent panel will decide whether to refer Mr Johnson to the party's board. Possible action includes suspension of membership or expulsion from the party among other, lesser sanctions.
    ... and ALL THIS, because he DARED to publicly offer criticism of the burkha, this in BRITISH society !!!

    You approve, don't you, Noir, of where this is leading.
    Last edited by Drummond; 08-09-2018 at 10:53 AM.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  17. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475725

    Default

    More like bags of garbage instead of the boxes.

    A shame, and perhaps this is the way they want it, especially in the States and other non-muslim countries - but they will rarely meet people and have the same "touch" with the world as a result. One can still be MORE than modest without wearing a garbage bag. But hey, if that's their choice, that's their choice.

    I just don't think they should ever expect others to follow suit. And I think they should be prepared to have them banned in further non-muslim places. And deservedly do.
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  18. Thanks Drummond thanked this post
  19. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    More like bags of garbage instead of the boxes.

    A shame, and perhaps this is the way they want it, especially in the States and other non-muslim countries - but they will rarely meet people and have the same "touch" with the world as a result. One can still be MORE than modest without wearing a garbage bag. But hey, if that's their choice, that's their choice.

    I just don't think they should ever expect others to follow suit. And I think they should be prepared to have them banned in further non-muslim places. And deservedly do.
    The problem, of course, is that Muslims DEMAND total tolerance. Over here, the issue is one of why they're not getting it, and, if they're not, how this can or 'should' be spun. A Muslim woman wears a burkha ... so, there's an expectation of intolerance towards anyone critical of it.

    Boris Johnson was, until recently, a major politician here. Someone of his relative stature, though, isn't immune to dire personal consequences, should he break from the PC line of daring to be critical instead of following the total tolerance line.

    Be silent. 'Or else'.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  20. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks (Given)
    34364
    Thanks (Received)
    26480
    Likes (Given)
    2383
    Likes (Received)
    10003
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default burkha

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummond View Post
    The problem, of course, is that Muslims DEMAND total tolerance. Over here, the issue is one of why they're not getting it, and, if they're not, how this can or 'should' be spun. A Muslim woman wears a burkha ... so, there's an expectation of intolerance towards anyone critical of it.

    Boris Johnson was, until recently, a major politician here. Someone of his relative stature, though, isn't immune to dire personal consequences, should he break from the PC line of daring to be critical instead of following the total tolerance line.

    Be silent. 'Or else'.
    I'll tell you right now ... a burkha is a PERFECT disguise to rob a bank. Especially in a Muslim community. Can you imagine the police lineup?

    "#3, step forward, please ...."
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  21. Thanks Drummond thanked this post
    Likes Drummond liked this post
  22. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I'll tell you right now ... a burkha is a PERFECT disguise to rob a bank. Especially in a Muslim community. Can you imagine the police lineup?

    "#3, step forward, please ...."
    Yes, I know. It's completely ridiculous.

    Boris himself, despite being as critical as he was, did NOT call for an outright ban on its being worn in public. But consider what he's enduring, for even speaking out as he has !!

    We're so 'PC-stupid' over here that we'd rather destroy reputable careers than ban a perfect bank-robber's garb !!
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums