**Exchange between President Trump and Radical leftist CNN's Jim Acosta ....

[Gunny]

Well that's reassuring.



If nobody cares about my points they're welcome to not reply to my posts.
Clear it up for you?

Don't post them and I won't reply. Otherwise, STFU and don't be telling me what to do. I addressed the topic itself previously. You have yet to do so; rather, choose to address some inane and irrelevant non-issue. You're so sad at this you're making Acosta look good. Hope you got a day job.

[jimnyc]

Don't post them and I won't reply. Otherwise, STFU and don't be telling me what to do. I addressed the topic itself previously. You have yet to do so; rather, choose to address some inane and irrelevant non-issue. You're so sad at this you're making Acosta look good. Hope you got a day job.

"I will act like your post doesn't exist. Maybe I'll get to it another day. Until I get my exact questions answered about this video that means nothing at the end of the day, I will ignore the touching of this woman 100% and change the subject or ignore what you say. I will act completely different as I have defended in the past. And why? You tell me..."

Not a riddle really, just pointing out the more than obvious, and the hypocrisy.

[Noir]

"I will act like your post doesn't exist. Maybe I'll get to it another day. Until I get my exact questions answered about this video that means nothing at the end of the day, I will ignore the touching of this woman 100% and change the subject or ignore what you say. I will act completely different as I have defended in the past. And why? You tell me..."

Not a riddle really, just pointing out the more than obvious, and the hypocrisy.

That's a reasonable statement given the conversation of the thread.
My interest is in the defence of the video Sanders posted, and not a general agreement that Acosta should of given the microphone over to the intern. If you want to requote with and agree about that part of the story you have plenty to chose from. I don't think that kind of "discussion" is interesting, but fairplay if you do.

[jimnyc]

That's a reasonable statement given the conversation of the thread.
My interest is in the defence of the video Sanders posted, and not a general agreement that Acosta should of given the microphone over to the intern. If you want to requote with and agree about that part of the story you have plenty to chose from. I don't think that kind of "discussion" is interesting, but fairplay if you do.

In other words - you are more interested in the video - than you are of the live events and the fact that a man layed his hands upon a young intern.

Gotcha, fair enough.

[Noir]

In other words - you are more interested in the video - than you are of the live events and the fact that a man layed his hands upon a young intern.

Gotcha, fair enough.

I am more interested in discussion than agreement.

[Gunny]

I am more interested in discussion than agreement.

Then address the topic. Should be pretty clear to you by now your deflection is irrelevant.

Move on.