This was a setup from the days the fisa warrants were wrongly given out. Then they/Hillary and others beefed up all other kinds of things about Trump, hoping to win the election. -- And when all else failed, they are trying their best to get him tossed.

---

Here’s The List: The Top 10 Crimes Committed by the Corrupt and Conflicted Mueller Investigative and Legal Team

The Mueller Gang of corrupt and conflicted FBI and DOJ operatives has participated in numerous corrupt and criminal actions. It’s long past time to turn the page on this terrible chapter in US history and lock these scoundrels up. Here is a list of the (at least) top 10 criminal actions taken by the Mueller team.

The Mueller investigation is criminal and corrupt and above all unconstitutional. We provided a list of 10 reasons in April describing why the Mueller investigation is unconstitutional.

Here is our list of the 10 material crimes committed by the Mueller gang –

1. Rosenstein’s special counsel order identifies collusion as the crime but no such crime exists in US Law -.

Gregg Jarrett at FOX News wrote more than a year ago when Mueller initially brought charges against President Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, that Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable because there is no such thing as the crime of collusion with foreign countries in the US statutory code.

Jarrett wrote the most succinct article about the Trump – Russia Collusion investigation to date. In his post Jarrett made many statements that were shocking, but none more than the fact that the entire investigation is lawless. Jarrett stated that no such crime as ‘collusion’ exists in American statutory law, except in anti-trust matters. It has no application to elections and political campaigns.

It is not a crime to talk to a Russian. Not that the media would ever understand that. They have never managed to point to a single statute that makes “colluding” with a foreign government in a political campaign a crime, likely because it does not exist in the criminal codes.
Because there was no crime, there was no legal reason for the Mueller investigation in the first place. Every action and deed, every criminal act since it was created (and many before it was created) are criminal due to the manner is which the investigation was set up in the first place.

2. Mueller’s investigation exceeds the scope of special counsel law which requires the scope of a special counsel to be specific. Rosenstein created the special counsel with a scope that was so broad it is not supported by this law –

Paul Manafort sued the DOJ, Mueller and Rosenstein because what they are doing is not supported by US Law as noted previously by Jarrett. Manafort’s case also argued in paragraph 33 that the special counsel put in place by crooked Rosenstein gave crooked and criminal Mueller powers that are not permitted by law –

But paragraph (b)(ii) of the Appointment Order purports to grant Mr. Mueller further authority to investigate and prosecute “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.” That grant of authority is not authorized by DOJ’s special counsel regulations. It is not a “specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated.” Nor is it an ancillary power to address efforts to impede or obstruct investigation under 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
After Rosenstein and Mueller provided a document to the court Gregg Jarrett tweeted that it was additional support that Mueller’s investigation is unconstitutional –

Manafort’s efforts to stop the investigation were eventually overruled by an ‘Obama judge’, the corrupt Amy Berman Jackson.

3. Mueller accepted the special counsel position with known conflicts of interest –

Gregg Jarrett also called for Mueller to resign in June of 2017 stating the special counsel had an egregious conflict of interest.

In a previous Fox News column, Jarrett stated:

The Washington Post reported that that Robert Mueller is now investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, examining not only the president’s alleged statement to James Comey in their February meeting, but also the firing of the FBI Director.

If true, this development makes the argument even more compelling that Mueller cannot serve as special counsel. He has an egregious conflict of interest.

The special counsel statute specifically prohibits Mueller from serving if he has “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the investigation or prosecution.” The language is mandatory. He “shall” disqualify himself. Comey is substantially involved in the case. Indeed, he is the central witness.

The two men and former colleagues have long been friends, allies and partners. Agents have quipped that they were joined at the hip while at the Department of Justice and the FBI. They have a mentor-protégé relationship. The likelihood of prejudice and favoritism is glaring and severe.

So, it is incomprehensible that the man who is a close friend of the star witness against the president… will now determine whether the president committed a prosecutable crime in his dealings with Mueller’s good friend.
4. Rosenstein and Mueller’s entire team’s known conflicts of interest.

5. The Deep State targeting of General Mike Flynn, George Papadopoulos and Paul Manafort after illegally spying on them and candidate and President Trump –

6. The Deep State raid on Paul Manafort’s house in the early hours with guns cocked and ready –

Rest - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...nd-legal-team/