Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    58,688
    Thanks (Given)
    6973
    Thanks (Received)
    26460
    Likes (Given)
    2925
    Likes (Received)
    3219
    Mentioned
    370 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475580

    Default Impeachment public inquiry day 3

    I thought it was more like 5, but whatever, all the BS makes it seem longer. I read a poll yesterday that said that about 75% of Americans think it's BS and ain't even paying attention.

    Another star witness today that will likely commit perjury, or the Dems will limit things and not let out all the truth once again.


    ---

    Impeachment Inquiry Cheat Sheet: Kurt Volker’s Past Testimony

    Kurt Volker, the former United States Representative for Ukraine negotiations, will testify Tuesday afternoon on the third day of public hearings in the House Intelligence Committee as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

    Volker’s October 3 closed-door testimony has been the most beneficial to Trump’s defense. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), who was present for Volker’s testimony, said soon after that his comments “exonerated” Trump.

    Volker excited Democrats when he resigned from his post in September after being mentioned in connection with what they allege was an effort to use U.S. aid as leverage to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival to Trump in the 2020 election.

    However, Volker told a closed-door hearing last month that he had simply resigned because he could not continue his role in the shadow of the allegations — but not because the allegations were true.

    In fact, he said that President Trump never wanted Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on Biden, and never mentioned the 2020 elections.

    He also testified that Ukraine did not believe there had been a “quid pro quo” and that the Ukrainians were never aware that U.S. aid had been held up internally.

    “I was never asked to do anything that I thought was wrong” by the president, he testified.

    Volker was critical of the hold on U.S. aid to Ukraine. Separately, he was also skeptical of the idea of asking Ukraine to conduct investigations into interference in the 2016 election, and into Hunter Biden’s dealings with Burisma. He testified that he advised Ukraine not to interfere in U.S. politics.

    However, he also understood President Trump’s concerns about perceptions that Ukraine had opposed him in 2016, and that it was still corrupt. He also thought U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland — one of the more controversial figures in the drama — was acting out of good motives and “took a strong interest” in having the E.U. do more for Ukraine.

    Volker also praised Trump for giving Ukraine defensive weapons — something that President Barack Obama had not done.

    In sum, Volker — a career diplomat praised by his colleagues, including former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch in last Friday’s public hearing — comes across a conscientious public servant, doing his best to reconcile competing demands within the administration, in pursuit of the objective of helping Ukraine stand up to Russian aggression.

    Key Democrat Talking Points

    1. Democrats will hammer the point that Volker was very critical of the actions of President Trump’s personal lawyer, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, in Ukraine. Volker provided texts that show U.S. officials, and Giuliani, asking for investigations into Burisma and the 2016 election in exchange for a meeting with Trump.

    What Democrats don’t want you to know: Volker testified that he did not think it was “improper” to contact Giuliani, since he was seen as a useful conduit to the president. He also testified that he “made clear to the Ukrainians on a number of occasions that Mayor Gjuliani is a private citizen and the President’s personal lawyer and that he does not represent the United States Government.” He believed Giuliani had been poorly informed — for example, about Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch — but that he was acting on his own. He also said that he understood the president’s concerns about Yovanovitch, if he believed reports about her to be true.

    2. Democrats will focus on Volker’s testimony that Giuliani wanted the Ukrainian government to issue a statement that mentioned they were investigating Burisma and the 2016 election — not just fighting corruption in general.

    What Democrats don’t want you to know: Volker rejected the idea that Trump had asked Ukraine to “dig up dirt” or “manufacture” information on the Bidens: “I think there’s a difference between the manufacture or dig up dirt versus finding out did anything happen in the 2016 campaign or did anything happen with Burisma I think — or even if he’s asking them to investigate the Bidens, it js to find out what facts there may be rather than to manufacture something.” He also said Trump was mainly interested in the 2016 election interference — and that there was never any mention of the 2020 presidential election in his discussions with Ukraine. He also observed that when Trump asked Zelensky to investigate in their phone call, he also referred him to Attorney General William Barr: “It was at least saying, you know, work in an official, legal channel.” He added that Trump had a “deep-rooted, skeptical view of Ukraine” that went back long before 2019.

    3. Democrats will focus on text messages in which Sondland emphasized that President Trump “really wants the deliverable,” i.e. the investigations, suggesting that there was a quid pro quo imposed on the Ukrainians.

    What Democrats don’t want you to know: Volker testified that President Trump never withheld or delayed a meeting with Zelensky until Ukraine committed to an investigation. He also said that the U.S. held no “leverage” over Ukraine in the discussion of U.S. aid, because the Ukrainians had no idea it had been withheld until much later. And he thought the hold on U.S. aid was “not significant” in the long run.

    https://www.breitbart.com/national-s...ast-testimony/
    “A person who has never owned a dog has missed a wonderful part of life.”Bob Barker
    “Once you have had a wonderful dog, a life without one, is a life diminished.”Dean Koontz
    "If I could be half the person my dog is, I'd be twice the human I am" - Charles Yu

  2. Thanks LongTermGuy thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    58,688
    Thanks (Given)
    6973
    Thanks (Received)
    26460
    Likes (Given)
    2925
    Likes (Received)
    3219
    Mentioned
    370 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475580

    Default

    A mini Schifty Schiff

    These folks have no shame. Regardless of the facts, they will sit back and look directly into cameras and tell their OWN versions of events...

    Alexander Vindman Admits Making up Parts of Trump Call Summary

    Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman admitted he made up elements of President Donald Trump’s call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an official summary.

    Prior to the call, Vindman included a discussion about corruption in the talking points provided to the president but Trump did not use them in the call.

    The summary Vindman wrote after the call read:

    President Trump underscored the unwavering support of the United States for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity – within its internationally recognized borders – and expressed his commitment to work together with President-elect Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people to implement reforms that strengthen democracy, increase prosperity, and root out corruption.
    But Vindman clarified during his testimony that the president did not bring up the topic rooting out corruption during the phone call, but he included it in his summary of the call anyway.

    When asked by the Democrat counsel about whether the summary he wrote was false, Vindman hesitated.

    “That’s not entirely accurate, but I’m not sure I would describe it as false, it was consistent with U.S. policy,” Vindman said.

    Vindman said he included the rhetoric about corruption as a “messaging platform” to describe U.S. policy toward Ukraine, even though it was not discussed on the call.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-call-summary/
    “A person who has never owned a dog has missed a wonderful part of life.”Bob Barker
    “Once you have had a wonderful dog, a life without one, is a life diminished.”Dean Koontz
    "If I could be half the person my dog is, I'd be twice the human I am" - Charles Yu

  4. Thanks LongTermGuy thanked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    At your Six
    Posts
    10,646
    Thanks (Given)
    21842
    Thanks (Received)
    9323
    Likes (Given)
    3455
    Likes (Received)
    908
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12408692

    Default

    In the 3,500 pages of transcripts released so far....there was only one reference to bribery. Ironically to describe Vice President `Biden’s conduct`... not President Trump’s. Why did we go from quid pro quo to extortion now to bribery? The answer is polling.



  6. Likes jimnyc liked this post
  7. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    At your Six
    Posts
    10,646
    Thanks (Given)
    21842
    Thanks (Received)
    9323
    Likes (Given)
    3455
    Likes (Received)
    908
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12408692

    Default


    In case You missed it...




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •