Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    246
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    215

    Default Republicans attack Bush

    State of Disunion: Republicans Beat Up on Bush After Speech
    Prominent Republican Congressmen Take Shots At the President on Iraq, Energy, Health Care

    State of Disunion: Republicans Beat Up on Bush After Speech

    By MARCUS BARAM

    Jan. 24, 2007 — Dozens of Republican leaders joined Democrats in taking aim at President Bush's State of the Union address Tuesday night.

    Facing a split within his own party and sagging approval ratings over Iraq, the president faced a major challenge: to win over the American public and to win back the support of prominent Republicans, who oppose his strategy for Iraq.

    In Bush's 50-minute speech, he implored Congress to back his plan to send more troops: "Give it a chance to work."

    But over the next two hours, a bipartisan group assailed his policies. Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter both attacked the president's plan for a troop buildup.

    "To put more American personnel in harm's way without a realistic chance for success is something I'm not in favor of," said Specter. And Snowe, who has signed on with Sens.Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), Joe Biden (D-Del.) and Carl Levin (D-Mich.) in a resolution opposing the surge, said, "I continue to believe that adding additional troops does not address the root causes of violence in Iraq."

    The speech didn't sway Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), who said that he remains opposed to the troop increase. "It hasn't changed by mind," Brownback said. "I think we have to have a bipartisan buy-in on the war in Iraq."

    And Virginia Republican John Warner, a powerful member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who opposes the surge but is against Hagel's nonbinding resolution, was more complimentary of Democratic Sen. Jim Webb's response than he was of Bush's speech.

    After praising Bush for his "gracious" introduction of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Warned added that Webb's "heartfelt" message "earned the respect of military families across America.

    In his speech, Bush made an impassioned effort to revive his presidency by offering proposals to extend health insurance coverage and to cut gasoline consumption.

    And he pushed his immigration program, which failed in the face of Republican opposition last year.

    But even those proposals were criticized by numerous Republicans.

    On health care, Larry Craig (R-Idaho) said Bush's plan "moves us in the right direction." But he worries about how the plan would treat employers' contributions toward health insurance as taxable income.

    "Unfortunately, the accompanying tax increase will be impossible to swallow," he said.

    As for energy, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) called it a "a good start" but said "much more can be done," adding that he wants Bush to tap Utah's geothermal energy sources.

    And New Mexico Republican Sen. Pete Domenici was disappointed in the president's plan, saying, "I have been troubled by the administration's tepid commitment to loan guarantee programs that will provide the support needed to deploy biomass, solar, clean coal and nuclear energy."

    And regarding the troop surge in Iraq, some of the president's supporters —
    such as Republican Sen. Pat Roberts — were concerned that these domestic proposals would not survive the bipartisan skepticism of Bush's policies.

    "What remains to be seen is whether any of the president's domestic agenda, no matter how worthy, can get off the ground without greater public and congressional support," said Roberts.

    Among the president's supporters were Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who has become one of Bush's biggest cheerleaders since their vicious battled during the 2000 presidential primary.

    In language that almost mirrored Bush's speech, McCain told ABC News' Charles Gibson that the president's strategy "ought to be given a chance." Another ally was independent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, who challenged Congress to respond to Bush's domestic ideas. "Whether the issue is energy independence, immigration, health care, education, global warming or the war in Iraq, I would hope that this Congress would put progress before partisanship," he said.
    The Associated Press contributed to this story.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2818145&page=2

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Are Republicans saying its a good start but not enough really attacking the President?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    246
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    Are Republicans saying its a good start but not enough really attacking the President?
    No. Orrin Hatch said that Bush's energy proposal in the SOTU was:

    "a good start" but said "much more can be done," adding that he wants Bush to tap Utah's geothermal energy sources.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirt mcgirt View Post
    No. Orrin Hatch said that Bush's energy proposal in the SOTU was:

    "a good start" but said "much more can be done," adding that he wants Bush to tap Utah's geothermal energy sources.
    I know what he said. I can read. But I hardly see that as an attack.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Orrin Hatch wasn't the only one criticising him. And Republicans in Congress almost never criticised him before - at least not without being accused of treason

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbalicious View Post
    Orrin Hatch wasn't the only one criticising him. And Republicans in Congress almost never criticised him before - at least not without being accused of treason
    Since when exactly? Republicans have always criticized the President when they disagree.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    Since when exactly? Republicans have always criticized the President when they disagree.
    Name one time until now a Republican's disagreed with the President and hasn't gotten shot down in flames by the party at large and every conservative pundit in the media for it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    Isn't this interesting, in light of what is going on these days with President Trump?

    I had to necromance it...

    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,606
    Thanks (Given)
    23861
    Thanks (Received)
    17381
    Likes (Given)
    9633
    Likes (Received)
    6082
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Isn't this interesting, in light of what is going on these days with President Trump?

    I had to necromance it...

    Criticizing the president of 'your party' now is just wrong for both major parties. No differences. As for opposing members of both parties, no holds barred.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    The ATL
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks (Given)
    802
    Thanks (Received)
    836
    Likes (Given)
    1040
    Likes (Received)
    511
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6672325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Criticizing the president of 'your party' now is just wrong for both major parties. No differences. As for opposing members of both parties, no holds barred.
    I'm not sure Sens. Romney, Collins, Murkowski, Sasse, Portman, Alexander, Gardner and McSally would necessarily agree with your assessment of the Republican Party.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,606
    Thanks (Given)
    23861
    Thanks (Received)
    17381
    Likes (Given)
    9633
    Likes (Received)
    6082
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FakeNewsSux View Post
    I'm not sure Sens. Romney, Collins, Murkowski, Sasse, Portman, Alexander, Gardner and McSally would necessarily agree with your assessment of the Republican Party.
    and their standing in the party? No differences anymore. Those that disagree with their party tend to go to the other side, as neither party will tolerate dissension.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    The ATL
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks (Given)
    802
    Thanks (Received)
    836
    Likes (Given)
    1040
    Likes (Received)
    511
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6672325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    and their standing in the party? No differences anymore. Those that disagree with their party tend to go to the other side, as neither party will tolerate dissension.
    I'm not sure I'm getting your point. Could you please elaborate?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,606
    Thanks (Given)
    23861
    Thanks (Received)
    17381
    Likes (Given)
    9633
    Likes (Received)
    6082
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FakeNewsSux View Post
    I'm not sure I'm getting your point. Could you please elaborate?
    The Democrat who disagreed found himself better off moving to R party, though he'll still likely lose and will not be wholly accepted by Rs if he is reelected. Same has happened several times, from each party since Obama's election. The start of true loss of any middle ground.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    The ATL
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks (Given)
    802
    Thanks (Received)
    836
    Likes (Given)
    1040
    Likes (Received)
    511
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6672325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    The Democrat who disagreed found himself better off moving to R party, though he'll still likely lose and will not be wholly accepted by Rs if he is reelected. Same has happened several times, from each party since Obama's election. The start of true loss of any middle ground.
    But the Senators that I mentioned have not received the same type of sanction the Democrats have suffered. One was the Presidential candidate of the Party and most of the others have been happily voting against their Party's interests for a few terms now, quite often receiving concessions in exchange for their votes.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,606
    Thanks (Given)
    23861
    Thanks (Received)
    17381
    Likes (Given)
    9633
    Likes (Received)
    6082
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FakeNewsSux View Post
    But the Senators that I mentioned have not received the same type of sanction the Democrats have suffered. One was the Presidential candidate of the Party and most of the others have been happily voting against their Party's interests for a few terms now, quite often receiving concessions in exchange for their votes.
    Yeah, before Obama was elected.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums