Results 1 to 9 of 9

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,139
    Thanks (Given)
    34530
    Thanks (Received)
    26620
    Likes (Given)
    2486
    Likes (Received)
    10108
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    Maybe Trump had an opinion based on this, and perhaps Barr knew about this, and I bet others surely did too!!

    --

    Roger Stone’s Legal Team Releases Statement on Anti-Trump Lead Juror Tomeka Hart – They Are “Determining Appropriate Next Steps”

    Corrupt Obama-appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson last week denied Roger Stone’s sealed motion for a new trial.

    As reported earlier by Cristina Laila — according to the February 5th order issued by Judge Jackson, Roger Stone cited a problem with a juror, however his motion was denied.

    The details of the juror are unknown because the order released Wednesday was redacted, however, Roger Stone’s defense team in November tried to strike down several potential jurors who were overt Trump-hating leftists.

    Several potential jurors in Stone’s case ended up being Trump-hating, Obama-era officials who admittedly voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 so Stone’s lawyer’s tried to strike them as potential jurors. But Amy Berman Jackson wouldn’t let that happen.

    One of the potential jurors actually had a husband who worked in the DOJ and played a role in the Russian collusion hoax that ultimately took down Roger Stone — and Judge Jackson allowed her to remain as a potential juror!

    One juror is a far left Beto O’Rourke donor who wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post following the verdict against Trump with his jury of far left peers.

    And another juror was a Democrat candidate for office in Tennessee.

    Lead Juror Tomeka Hart has a history of anti-Trump rhetoric and her social media is littered with Trump-hating conspiracies.

    ...

    This same juror is a Trump-hating conspiracy nut.

    Rest - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...te-next-steps/


    Roger Stone Lead Juror Testified She Had No Bias Against Him – But She Attacked Roger Stone on Twitter Shortly After He Was Arrested!

    Corrupt Obama-appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson last week denied Roger Stone’s sealed motion for a new trial.

    According to the February 5th order issued by Judge Jackson, Roger Stone cited a problem with a juror, however his motion was denied.

    On Wednesday it was revealed the jury foreperson, Tomeka Hart, a former Dem Congressional candidate was a rabid Trump-hating left-wing activist.

    It gets worse…

    Tomeka Hart testified during the jury selection that she had no biases against Roger Stone and that she ‘hardly paid attention’ to the Russia investigation, but she specifically attacked Stone on Twitter shortly after he was arrested.

    The Daily Caller reported:



    Rest - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-was-arrested/
    Justice is blind. Just not as blind as these Demtards. I'd think a motion for retrial would be granted based on conflict of interest alone. IMO, politically active people shouldn't be sitting on juries deciding the fate of people involved in politics.

    But what do I know?
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    The ATL
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks (Given)
    802
    Thanks (Received)
    836
    Likes (Given)
    1040
    Likes (Received)
    511
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6672326

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Justice is blind. Just not as blind as these Demtards. I'd think a motion for retrial would be granted based on conflict of interest alone. IMO, politically active people shouldn't be sitting on juries deciding the fate of people involved in politics.

    But what do I know?
    Not just sitting on the jury but acting as the jury foreperson! Good luck on getting the judge granting a mistrial, she's a more rabid partisan than the jury foreperson. She's the Obama judge that stuck Manafort in solitary confinement and shuffled him off to Rikers instead of Club Fed. No, a motion for retrial will probably have to be dealt with on appeal.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,139
    Thanks (Given)
    34530
    Thanks (Received)
    26620
    Likes (Given)
    2486
    Likes (Received)
    10108
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FakeNewsSux View Post
    Not just sitting on the jury but acting as the jury foreperson! Good luck on getting the judge granting a mistrial, she's a more rabid partisan than the jury foreperson. She's the Obama judge that stuck Manafort in solitary confinement and shuffled him off to Rikers instead of Club Fed. No, a motion for retrial will probably have to be dealt with on appeal.
    I'd have hung the jury and let 11 people hate me for it. More have for less
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums