Results 1 to 15 of 20

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default Sweden Chose Wrong, Brazil Followed

    Not good:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...virus-response

    Prognosis
    Sweden Girds for Thousands of Deaths Amid Laxer Virus Response
    By Niclas Rolander and Charles Daly
    April 4, 2020, 5:42 AM MST

    There are signs that the death rate in Sweden is growing faster than elsewhere in Scandinavia, raising pressure on the government to abandon its controversial hands-off approach in tackling Covid-19.

    The Swedish experiment has drawn international bewilderment as schools, restaurants and cafes have remained open. And while other countries passed laws restricting movement, Sweden’s Prime Minister Stefan Lofven relied on the common sense of his fellow citizens to carry his country through the pandemic.

    But after a week of sobering data, Lofven now seems to be striking a darker tone. In an interview published on Saturday by Dagens Nyheter, he warned that Sweden may be facing “thousands” of coronavirus deaths, and said the crisis is likely to drag on for months rather than weeks. Meanwhile, newspaper Expressen reported that his Social Democrat-led government may be seeking extraordinary powers to bypass parliament and force through a sterner response to the virus.

    The number of Swedish deaths rose to 373 on Saturday, up 12% from Friday. That brings the rate per million in Scandinavia’s biggest economy to 36, compared with 29 in Denmark and 9 in Norway, where much tougher lockdowns are in place.

    Sweden’s top epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, says the goal in his country, like everywhere else, is to “flatten the curve” to avoid overwhelming hospitals. As of Thursday, he said that curve is “starting to become somewhat steeper, but overall” remains “fairly flat.”

    But Covid-19 comes with so many unknowns that Sweden’s approach has some of its own experts worried.

    ...




    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    More:

    https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2...-like-mistake/

    Sweden’s Coronavirus Approach Is Starting To Look Like A Mistake
    JOHN SEXTONPosted at 4:41 pm on April 9, 2020

    The Swedish experiment continues to be one of the most interesting things happening in the world right now. Pretty much every other country in the world, including Sweden’s neighbors Denmark and Norway, have adopted similar types of government-ordered social distancing. But in Sweden, the country is merely asking people to be sensible and hoping that’s enough to slow the spread of the virus.


    Anders Tegnell, the head epidemiologist at the semi-independent agency that is managing the Swedish response has denied that he is pursuing a herd immunity strategy but has previously said in an interview “We will not be able to control it in any other way.”


    The Swedish response appears almost libertarian at first glance, but it isn’t based on trusting individuals so much as it is on trusting that most Swedes will do what the government recommends without being forced.


    The government was clear, though, that Swedes should adopt the usual social distancing measures to flatten the curve. And experts told me the population typically trusts what officials say and abides by their guidelines, allowing officials not to have to impose strict measures.


    Top Swedish officials say that two-way trust is paying off. “It is a myth that life goes on as normal in Sweden. Many people stay at home and have stopped traveling,” Sweden’s Minister of Health and Social Affairs Lena Hallengren told me. “There is no full lockdown of Sweden, but many parts of the Swedish society have shut down.”


    In addition to this high level of trust in government, the Washington Post reports that “public health nationalism” has taken hold with many Swedes.


    In the past few weeks, the country has experienced a bizarre nationalistic wave dubbed “public health nationalism” (”folkhälsonationalism”), which celebrates Sweden as an island of common sense in a sea of panic and resistance to science. According to this narrative promulgated by authorities and media alike, cultural exceptionalism — such as high public trust –– makes Sweden particularly well-equipped to manage the pandemic. When asked why Sweden’s strategy deviates from other countries’, Sweden’s influential former state epidemiologist Johan Giesecke quipped, “That is because everyone else is doing it wrong.” He went on to explain how he could be so confident: ”I think we will manage the epidemic without destroying the economy more than necessary. The absolutely most important thing is to protect the elderly from getting infected. I think we succeed quite well in that. It lies in the Swedish national character to do as one is told.”


    And to be clear, the Swedish approach may still have some long term advantages. There simply isn’t enough data to draw conclusions at this point about what the trade-offs will be. It’s entirely possible that if we’re still locked in our homes three months from now and U.S. unemployment is above 30 percent, the Swedish approach may come to look like the wiser choice to some people.


    But in the short term, it’s starting to look as if the Swedish approach will result in an increased death toll and overwhelmed hospitals, i.e. the very thing the U.S. and other countries are trying to avoid:


    A head doctor at a major hospital in Sweden says the current approach will “probably end in a historical massacre.” He says healthcare workers at his hospital who have tested positive for the virus but are asymptomatic have been advised to continue working. He asked to remain anonymous because “it is frowned upon to speak of the epidemic or to go against the official vision” but said he felt a need to speak out from an “ethical and medical point of view.”


    The Swedish legislature will meet this week to discuss whether tougher measures restricting business and travel should be implemented. Söderberg-Nauclér says it’s already too late to prevent chaos in Stockholm but that preventative lockdown measures could still be taken throughout other parts of the country.


    “If they are right and we are wrong, I will open a bottle of champagne,” Söderberg-Nauclér says. She notes that, based on the modeling she’s seen, the healthcare system in Sweden will collapse if stricter measures are not adopted immediately. “But I will not give up the fight until the government shows us evidence for their strategy.”


    A Swedish virologist told Vox, “I didn’t sign my informed consent for this experiment.” That’s really what this is: A nationwide experiment that we’re all watching play out in real time. The legislature may decide to clamp down this week and put an end to the experiment but it may already be too late to avoid a disaster. As of today, Sweden has 9,141 confirmed cases and 793 deaths. Denmark has 5,830 confirmed cases and 237 deaths.


    This PBS report, published yesterday, gives some good insight into the Swedish approach including resistance to it from within Sweden:
    video at site


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Podunk, WI
    Posts
    9,836
    Thanks (Given)
    4248
    Thanks (Received)
    4521
    Likes (Given)
    4519
    Likes (Received)
    2812
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Sweden was powerless against their muslim invasion as well.

    What a pathetic nation of sheep.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    At your Six
    Posts
    16,429
    Thanks (Given)
    24430
    Thanks (Received)
    11203
    Likes (Given)
    6054
    Likes (Received)
    4653
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13945535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by High_Plains_Drifter View Post
    Sweden was powerless against their muslim invasion as well.

    What a pathetic nation of sheep.


    The Islamic Invasion of Politically Correct Sweden

    https://www.khouse.org/enews_article/2014/2328/



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Agree:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/2954433001/

    Time to put China on lockdown for its dishonesty amid coronavirus crisis
    China’s response was inept, dishonest and utterly inconsiderate of the world. We need to teach the Chinese government a lesson.
    Glenn Harlan Reynolds

    There are many lessons to be learned from the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic. But one is already clear: China needs to be isolated from the civilized world until its behavior improves. We are in the current situation, with deaths and economic devastation worldwide, because China handled this outbreak with its trademark mixture of dishonesty, incompetence and thuggery. Were China a more civilized nation, this outbreak would have been stopped early, and with far less harm, inside and outside of China.


    As Marion Smith wrote in these pages on Sunday, China’s first response was to clamp down on reports of the then-new disease that had appeared in Wuhan. The brave doctor, Li Wenliang, who first reported the disease to fellow physicians was silenced by police. Chinese media reports of the disease were censored by the government. So were ordinary citizens reporting on social media.


    Coronavirus coverup
    According to U.S. intelligence agencies, China systematically deceived the world about the extent of the outbreak, lulling other nations into a false sense of security that delayed a response by weeks or even months.




    As Smith writes: “Beijing denied until Jan. 20 that human to human transmission was occurring. Yet at the same time, Chinese officials and state-owned companies were urgently acquiring bulk medical supplies — especially personal protective equipment like masks and gloves — from Australia, Europe, and around the world. Put simply, Beijing hoarded the world’s life-saving resources while falsely claiming that people’s lives weren’t at risk.”




    Marion Smith:Blame the Chinese Communist Party for the coronavirus crisis


    And this is the most charitable account, based on China failing to deal with what was, at root, a naturally occurring disease outbreak. And it may have been naturally occurring. But people are increasingly entertaining the possibility that the COVID-19 virus was accidentally released by a Chinese virology lab in Wuhan.


    That notion was once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, but it has since been discussed in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and by uber-establishment Washington Post columnist David Ignatius. The talk is of an accidental release, not the deliberate deployment of a biological weapon — which makes sense, since few nations would release a bioweapon in their own heartland — but if it’s true it only makes the Chinese government look worse, though it perhaps explains their unwillingness to be forthcoming.


    Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Hangzhou, in eastern China's Zhejiang Province, on March 31, 2020.
    But wherever the virus came from, China’s response was inept, dishonest and utterly inconsiderate of the rest of the world. A competent, honest response would have placed the world on notice much earlier. A China that cared about the rest of the world would have halted flights abroad while this disease was spreading, instead of allowing its citizens to spread willy-nilly around the globe. (As Brian Kennedy writes: “China seems to have taken the position that if they were to suffer the coronavirus, so too was the United States and the rest of the world. What else is to explain the continuation of flights from China to the United States at the rate of some 20,000 passengers a day, until President Trump wisely shut them down?”)


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by High_Plains_Drifter View Post
    Sweden was powerless against their muslim invasion as well.

    What a pathetic nation of sheep.
    That's exactly right ... maybe even more so than you realise.

    The Left-wing 'Revolution' has gone even further, in Sweden, than it has in the UK.

    There, the Swedes have got to the point of having it as fundamental to their worldview that they 'must' obey their authorities and accept their 'wisdom'. The spirit of questioning has been essentially killed off there. The Almighty State says, 'Jump' ... the citizen asks about the height of the stratosphere.

    .... so, if their authorities insist upon an approach that's a nonsense, that's far worse than its alternative, Swedes will not only not question it, but will obey diktat as though their lives depended on it (which, in this case, is no less than true).

    This is nothing more or less than viewing the product of unrestrained Leftieism. A lesson - indeed, a LIFE lesson - against tolerating ANY degree of that political poison.

    It can easily be, literally, a killer.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummond View Post
    That's exactly right ... maybe even more so than you realise.

    The Left-wing 'Revolution' has gone even further, in Sweden, than it has in the UK.

    There, the Swedes have got to the point of having it as fundamental to their worldview that they 'must' obey their authorities and accept their 'wisdom'. The spirit of questioning has been essentially killed off there. The Almighty State says, 'Jump' ... the citizen asks about the height of the stratosphere.

    .... so, if their authorities insist upon an approach that's a nonsense, that's far worse than its alternative, Swedes will not only not question it, but will obey diktat as though their lives depended on it (which, in this case, is no less than true).

    This is nothing more or less than viewing the product of unrestrained Leftieism. A lesson - indeed, a LIFE lesson - against tolerating ANY degree of that political poison.

    It can easily be, literally, a killer.
    Well said. In reports they talk about the 'faith' of the people in the state and the state's faith in the people following.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Well said. In reports they talk about the 'faith' of the people in the state and the state's faith in the people following.
    Exactly.

    This is one where we totally see eye-to-eye.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums