In a recent US Supreme Court decision, Commiefornia's radical Ninth Circuit is again overturned, as the Court unanimously upholds a federal statute that forbids encouraging illegal aliens to remain in the country unlawfully.

The decision voids that of the Ninth Circuit, which ruled a federal anti-harboring statute was unconstitutional on the grounds it violated the First Amendment by restricting free speech. The appellate court was also criticized for "drastically" straying from judicial norms.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, well known communist of the bench, wrote the high court's opinion:

"[T]he appeals panel departed so drastically from the principle of party presentation as to constitute an abuse of discretion" Ginsburg later stated that "a court is not hidebound by the precise arguments of counsel, but the Ninth Circuit’s radical transformation of this case goes well beyond the pale." (RELATED: Trump’s Win With Appeals Court Prevents Release Of 250 ICE Detainees)

The decision ends a court battle lasting nearly 10 years, which began when a grand jury indicted California immigration consultant Evelyn Sineneng-Smith in 2010 for multiple violations of anti-harboring laws, which make it a felony to "encourag[e] or induc[e] an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law."

Story Link: https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/08/s...g-immigration/