Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    61,336
    Thanks (Given)
    7077
    Thanks (Received)
    28558
    Likes (Given)
    3791
    Likes (Received)
    4528
    Mentioned
    419 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475614

    Default

    C'mon now, PLEASE tell me that Pete didn't jump on yet another, that ultimately turns out to be wrong. So, I lost count, does that make him 0 for 2,967 items on just Trump alone now?

    You would think folks would learn, at minimum not to run with ANYTHING the lefty MSM claims.

    Then again, there are weird folks out there that enjoy being wrong, or that want to be right and try so hard over and over, only to fail every damn time!! I almost feel sorry for Pete. Proven wrong pretty much about everything that he writes. Comical shit!! And I can't stop laughing, more anonymous sources BS, and still jumps on it like a boss.

    ---

    Pentagon: ‘No Corroborating Evidence’ Russians Offered Bounties for U.S. Troops in Afghanistan

    The Pentagon said in a statement late Tuesday evening that it had no corroborating evidence that Russian operatives offered bounties to the Taliban for American soldiers stationed in Afghanistan.

    “The Department of Defense continues to evaluate intelligence that Russian GRU operatives were engaged in malign activity against United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan. To date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open-source reports,” said Chief Pentagon Spokesman Jonathan Hoffman.

    “Regardless, we always take the safety and security of our forces in Afghanistan – and around the world – most seriously and therefore continuously adopt measures to prevent harm from potential threats,” Hoffman added.

    The statement came in response to a New York Times report that claimed that a Russian military intelligence unit secretly offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan.

    The Times cited anonymous officials “briefed on the matter.”

    The report claimed that the U.S. “concluded months ago” that the Russian unit had offered the bounties for successful attacks last year and that Islamist militants, or criminal elements closely associated with them, collected some bounty money and that the finding was briefed to President Donald Trump.

    The report claimed that the National Security Council discussed the problem at an interagency meeting in late March, and officials developed a “menu of potential options,” but the White House had not authorized any step.

    White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the president and the vice president were never briefed on the allegations, and that there was no consensus among the intelligence community on the allegations.

    “The U.S. receives thousands of reports a day on intelligence, and they are subject to strict scrutiny. While the White House does not routinely comment on alleged intelligence or internal deliberations, the CIA Director, [the] National Security Advisor, and the Chief of Staff can all confirm that neither the President nor the Vice President were briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence,” she said.

    “There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations, and, in effect, there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence community with regards to the veracity of what’s being reported. And the veracity of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated,” she added.

    The report comes as the president has sought to continue drawing down U.S. forces and end the war in Afghanistan.

    Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL), an Army Green Beret who has served in Afghanistan, questioned the timing of the Times’s report.

    “We’ve known for years that the Russians have been supporting the Taliban through arms, through weapons, through other means…so to me, this really smacks of partisan talking points of hearing Russia and the President and trying to make hay of that in an election year,” he said Tuesday in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier.

    Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), a Navy veteran who has also served in Afghanistan, slammed the Times report for citing “unconfirmed intel” that is part of an ongoing investigation.

    “The real scandal: We’ll likely never know the truth… Because the @nytimes used unconfirmed intel in an ONGOING investigation into targeted killing of American soldiers in order to smear the President. The blood is on their hands,” he tweeted.

    “Having served in Afghanistan during the time the alleged bounties were placed, no one is angrier about this than me,” Banks added.

    “Now it’s impossible to finish the investigation. All b/c the @nytimes will do anything to damage @realdonaldtrump, even if it means compromising nat’l security.”



    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...s-afghanistan/
    “A person who has never owned a dog has missed a wonderful part of life.”Bob Barker
    “Once you have had a wonderful dog, a life without one, is a life diminished.”Dean Koontz
    "If I could be half the person my dog is, I'd be twice the human I am" - Charles Yu

  2. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    2,691
    Thanks (Given)
    345
    Thanks (Received)
    733
    Likes (Given)
    64
    Likes (Received)
    251
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5054483

    Default Russia offered bounties to Afghanistan militants for killing US soldiers

    I have to ask... if the intelligence was there.... and Pelosi and others were also briefed on it, then why didn’t THEY act on it?

    I guess they were too busy cooking up phony charges when impeaching the President?

    So why is it an issue now?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

  4. Thanks Gunny thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums