Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475726

    Default Ex-Colleagues See Durham Dropping Bombshells Before Labor Day

    I don't care about any political games with this. I disagree with waiting only because waiting may make it "disappear". Or defendants no longer held responsible.

    Justice and the truth is all that matters to me. I think perhaps they should immediately give an update on the case, whether it harms or absolves. If complete, then go forward the minute it's completed just like any other case. Nothing should be done any differently, IMO.

    ---

    Ex-Colleagues See Durham Dropping Bombshells Before Labor Day

    While much speculation inside the Beltway says U.S. Attorney John Durham will punt the results of his so-called Spygate investigation past the election to avoid charges of political interference, sources who have worked with Durham on past public corruption cases doubt he'll bend to political pressure — and they expect him to drop bombshells before Labor Day.

    Durham’s boss, Attorney General Bill Barr, also pushed back on the notion his hand-picked investigator would defer action. Under Democratic questioning on Capitol Hill last week, he refused to rule out a pre-election release.

    "Under oath, do you commit to not releasing any report by Mr. Durham before the November election?” Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.) asked Barr, citing longstanding Justice Department policy not to announce new developments in politically sensitive cases before an election.

    “No,” the attorney general curtly replied.

    Justice Department policy prohibits prosecutors from taking overt steps in politically charged cases typically within 60 days of an election. Accordingly, Durham would have to make a move by the Friday before Labor Day, or Sept. 4.

    A low-profile prosecutor, Durham has kept a tight lid on his investigation into the origins of the specious Russiagate investigation of Donald Trump and his 2016 campaign, leading to rampant speculation about who he might prosecute and whether he would take action ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election.

    That could well be of historic consequence, since his probe involves both the Trump administration and high-level officials in the previous administration, including Trump's presumptive Democratic rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. Recently declassified FBI notes show Biden offered input into the investigation of Trump adviser Michael Flynn in early January 2017. Another declassified document reveals that Biden was among those who requested Flynn’s identity be “unmasked” in foreign intelligence intercepts around that same time.

    If Durham announces criminal indictments or plea agreements involving former officials operating under the Obama-Biden administration, or releases a report documenting widespread corruption, independent voters could sour on Biden and sympathize with Trump. On the other hand, kicking the ball past the election could dispirit Trump’s base.

    “I would find it hard to believe that he punts under any circumstances,” said former assistant FBI director Chris Swecker, who knows Durham personally and has worked with the hard-nosed prosecutor on prior investigations.

    He pointed out that Durham would risk throwing away 16 months of investigative work if he delayed action beyond the election.

    Rest - https://www.realclearinvestigations....ay_124753.html
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  2. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, Russ, LongTermGuy, Gunny thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    I don't care about any political games with this. I disagree with waiting only because waiting may make it "disappear". Or defendants no longer held responsible.

    Justice and the truth is all that matters to me. I think perhaps they should immediately give an update on the case, whether it harms or absolves. If complete, then go forward the minute it's completed just like any other case. Nothing should be done any differently, IMO.

    ---

    Ex-Colleagues See Durham Dropping Bombshells Before Labor Day

    While much speculation inside the Beltway says U.S. Attorney John Durham will punt the results of his so-called Spygate investigation past the election to avoid charges of political interference, sources who have worked with Durham on past public corruption cases doubt he'll bend to political pressure — and they expect him to drop bombshells before Labor Day.

    Durham’s boss, Attorney General Bill Barr, also pushed back on the notion his hand-picked investigator would defer action. Under Democratic questioning on Capitol Hill last week, he refused to rule out a pre-election release.

    "Under oath, do you commit to not releasing any report by Mr. Durham before the November election?” Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.) asked Barr, citing longstanding Justice Department policy not to announce new developments in politically sensitive cases before an election.

    “No,” the attorney general curtly replied.

    Justice Department policy prohibits prosecutors from taking overt steps in politically charged cases typically within 60 days of an election. Accordingly, Durham would have to make a move by the Friday before Labor Day, or Sept. 4.

    A low-profile prosecutor, Durham has kept a tight lid on his investigation into the origins of the specious Russiagate investigation of Donald Trump and his 2016 campaign, leading to rampant speculation about who he might prosecute and whether he would take action ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election.

    That could well be of historic consequence, since his probe involves both the Trump administration and high-level officials in the previous administration, including Trump's presumptive Democratic rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. Recently declassified FBI notes show Biden offered input into the investigation of Trump adviser Michael Flynn in early January 2017. Another declassified document reveals that Biden was among those who requested Flynn’s identity be “unmasked” in foreign intelligence intercepts around that same time.

    If Durham announces criminal indictments or plea agreements involving former officials operating under the Obama-Biden administration, or releases a report documenting widespread corruption, independent voters could sour on Biden and sympathize with Trump. On the other hand, kicking the ball past the election could dispirit Trump’s base.

    “I would find it hard to believe that he punts under any circumstances,” said former assistant FBI director Chris Swecker, who knows Durham personally and has worked with the hard-nosed prosecutor on prior investigations.

    He pointed out that Durham would risk throwing away 16 months of investigative work if he delayed action beyond the election.

    Rest - https://www.realclearinvestigations....ay_124753.html
    Of course the lousy dems do not want the truth bursting out before the coming election.
    Because they know the truth will reveal how totally corrupt they are.
    My view is- it would indeed be a damn tragedy if it was not made public before the election!
    If they had such a damaging revelation they would have already been presenting it and raising unholy hell about it ..-Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  4. Thanks Russ, LongTermGuy thanked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mid Atlantic
    Posts
    1,773
    Thanks (Given)
    2091
    Thanks (Received)
    2905
    Likes (Given)
    1111
    Likes (Received)
    1238
    Piss Off (Given)
    2
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15439907

    Default

    I definitely agree with the idea that Durham better bring out whatever he has in September, because I can guarantee that if Biden is elected and gets sworn in on January 20th, then on January 21st (or possibly 5 minutes after inauguration on January 20th) the Durham investigation will get shut down, and never, ever see the light of day.

    Let's face it, Joe Biden is literally one of the possible suspects in the investigation. Obama, Hillary, Susan Rice, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey are the other suspects. Biden may only have 3 functioning brain cells left, but all 3 want this investigation shut down immediately.
    Last edited by Russ; 08-08-2020 at 07:17 PM.
    Ecclesiastes 10:2 - A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him to the left.
    Wise men don't need advice, and fools won't take it - Ben Franklin
    "It's not how you start, it's how you finish."

  6. Thanks LongTermGuy, Gunny thanked this post
    Likes Tyr-Ziu Saxnot liked this post
  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,134
    Thanks (Given)
    34528
    Thanks (Received)
    26616
    Likes (Given)
    2485
    Likes (Received)
    10107
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russ View Post
    I definitely agree with the idea that Durham better bring out whatever he has in September, because I can guarantee that if Biden is elected and gets sworn in on January 20th, then on January 21st (or possibly 5 minutes after inauguration on January 20th) the Durham investigation will get shut down, and never, ever see the light of day.

    Let's face it, Joe Biden is literally one of the possible suspects in the investigation. Obama, Hillary, Susan Rice, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey are the other suspects. Biden may only have 3 functioning brain cells left, but all 3 want this investigation shut down immediately.
    He needs to get it out beforehand. IF he's done. No reason to hold it up and every reason to lay it on the table.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  8. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums