U.S. Supreme Court allows release of Trump tax returns

[Gunny]

There may be things wrong in the justice system but trump is not the poster boy for it though some want him to be apparently. What's the point? Illegal is illegal. There's no globalist conspiracy here.

I kinda figured you had it in your head I'm all about Trump. Might want to try again. This is about what the Dems are getting away with doing. They're making sure that every weak-sister Republican knows they will go after you for any and everything, before, during and after. Just in case the left's gameplan goes awry as it did in 2016 and they lose grasp of the Presidency.

Conspiracy? No. An in your face witch hunf that only a dumbass would deny? You bet.

[icansayit]

There may be things wrong in the justice system but trump is not the poster boy for it though some want him to be apparently. What's the point? Illegal is illegal. There's no globalist conspiracy here.

The Dems, with the SCOTUS are now in the thankful position of DECLARING TRUMP GUILTY without using the Laws and Real Justice System Constitutionally where "YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY".
The Dems have been SWEARING That Trump is Guilty since before he took office. YOU can deny it all you want but sadly for YOU and the DEMS...You cannot change the Truth.

As for the GLOBALIST's...you may be right about NO CONSPIRACY. But there's no question Dear Old Georgie Porgy SOROS has his dirty little fingers in nearly EVERY RADICAL DEMOCRATS pocket with maybe...Extortion, Blackmail, and Actual Threats of Harm.

[fj1200]

I kinda figured you had it in your head I'm all about Trump. Might want to try again. This is about what the Dems are getting away with doing. They're making sure that every weak-sister Republican knows they will go after you for any and everything, before, during and after. Just in case the left's gameplan goes awry as it did in 2016 and they lose grasp of the Presidency.

Conspiracy? No. An in your face witch hunf that only a dumbass would deny? You bet.

I had it right the first time. The Dems suck. Have that right too.

[tailfins]

I suspect that those tax returns will show that Trump isn't as wealthy as he claims to be. Any half intelligent American should have more concerns about privacy being violated if that turns out to be the case. Generally, being a braggart isn't a crime.

[fj1200]

I suspect that those tax returns will show that Trump isn't as wealthy as he claims to be. Any half intelligent American should have more concerns about privacy being violated if that turns out to be the case. Generally, being a braggart isn't a crime.

I'm sure most of them will say privacy for me but not for thee. The thing that one of the previous stories referred to was them having access to the work product by the accounting firm where they would have two sets of books; one for loan purposes and one for tax purposes. Not sure what is necessarily illegal about that unless they're specifically engaging in tax fraud. Which would be the sort of thing the elites get to do but ordinary folks do not.

[Gunny]

I had it right the first time. The Dems suck. Have that right too.

No you didn't. You just threw out a leftwingnut label designed to silence those that won't shut up and conform. I find so-called conservatives doing that almost as troublesome as the the ones who refuse to acknowledge the elephant in the lifeboat.

Credit where it is due: you're batting a thousand with those two.

[KarlMarx]

During his time as president, Trump was immune from prosecution. In the eyes of his ever loyal support base, Trump should always be immune from prosecution. Fortunately, he is not. The tax cases come first. Then the sexual assault cases. Keep in mind that politicians are not bringing these cases. If Trump is found not guilty, so be it. At least others finally get their day in court.

Presidents are not immune from prosecution. There is a thing called impeachment, don't know if you've heard. The standard is treason, bribery, and other crimes and misdemeanors. From the USC...

Article I Section 3
Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States: but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.

Article II Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors

Sitting presidents are not hauled before a court of law, but are tried in the Senate. So, the question I have for you is this... why didn't the president face impeachment over these sexual assault charges? They certainly meet the criteria of high crimes and misdemeanors. Instead, Trump was impeached over a phone call and for giving a speech. As an aside, why wasn't Justice Kavanaugh impeached over those sexual assault accusations?

It seems to me that the Left was throwing stuff at Trump and, whatever they succeeded at getting something to stick to him, they ran with it be it littering or genocide.