Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475724

    Default 7 Radical Demands in the Equality Act

    I have no issue at all with protections against various forms of discrimination, but some is ridiculous. I always had an issue with allowing transgender to compete against other women. It's in no way fair, it's completely obvious why they destroy the competition. It would suck if in your last 3 years of school, after busting your ass and training and doing all that's necessary to win but you're always placing 2nd and not reaching the goal, their dreams. In that scenario the former men will most likely win every time. I understand if they want to be a different gender. I understand if they want to be accepted, don't want to be discriminated against. But there should be limitations. Other women should not be forced into changing in front of a man or them changing in front of you. Sometimes things come with a cost. (kinda like the vaccines, and not getting one is your choice, but any limitations in place may be used). This is something where you don't discriminate against a changed gender, but in doing so another woman/girl may be sexually harassed in some manner. - And then if/when in professional sports - and you will most likely see, someone eventually will play a man in women's sports that is transgender, at least to win.

    And then mandating that schools must have a curriculum about this subject & in a manner to affirm these changes.

    And if you don't allow your child to 'undergo transgender medical interventions and procedures', you may even lose custody! And this is a MINOR we are speaking of.

    ---

    7 Radical Demands in the Equality Act

    House Democrats have passed the radical Equality Act once again, claiming it will merely amend federal civil rights law to ensure sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes, even though the Constitution already provides protection for the rights of all American citizens, regardless of their “identity group.”

    If enacted, however, the Equality Act would have a major impact on children and their parents, potentially upending the culture as American families now know it. Lawsuits filed against Americans who adhere to the science of biological sex and the First Amendment rights of citizens would now have a federal law backing them up that states gender identity supersedes biological sex.



    Below are seven radical demands in the Equality Act:

    1 - The bill would end the federal legal recognition of complementary male and female sex in favor gender identity.

    The Act states discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity can take many forms:

    Discrimination based on sexual orientation includes discrimination based on an individual’s actual or perceived romantic, emotional, physical, or sexual attraction to other persons, or lack thereof, on the basis of gender. LGBTQ people, including gender nonbinary people, also commonly experience discrimination because of sex-based stereotypes. Many people are subjected to discrimination because of others’ perceptions or beliefs regarding their sexual orientation. Even if these perceptions are incorrect, the identity imputed by others forms the basis of discrimination.
    Mary Rice Hasson, fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) explains:

    The concept of “gender identity” is a steamroller obliterating the significance of “male” and “female” in our language, relationships, laws and spaces. Under the Equality Act, “gender identity” determines access to “public accommodations,” a category the act redefines to include just about everywhere.
    Hasson observes as well the Equality Act appears purposefully vague.

    It “makes no mention of what sex actually is,” she writes, “the unchangeable reality that a person is either ‘male’ or ‘female.'”

    The science of the biology of sex that people have been taught for centuries would no longer hold a place in federal law with the enactment of this legislation.

    Feminist groups, such as the Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) also voiced their concerns about the bill:

    While the Equality Act is being sold on promising good things for women, and on ending unfair treatment of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people—which almost everyone agrees are worthy and important goals—it’s poisoned with the destruction of the law’s ability to allow any accommodations for women on the basis of sex.
    WoLF noted as well many Americans may be unaware the Equality Act’s gender identity rules would pose a “danger” to women and children:

    The bill’s authors made clear that gender identity is to take precedence over and replace sex as a protected category. The bill doesn’t mention individuals with clinically diagnosed gender dysphoria, or undertaking surgical or hormonal transition, thus making clear that self-declared gender identity would be sufficient to claim protected legal status.
    2 - The bill would eliminate the traditional right to privacy of women and girls in public facilities, in favor, instead, of gender identity.

    The text of the Equality Act reads:

    An individual shall not be denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual’s gender identity.
    That language indicates the privacy of women and girls in public facilities, such as school bathrooms and locker rooms, would no longer be honored.

    In the case of school-age children, boys who identify as, or claim to be, girls, could share their bathrooms and shower rooms at school. Parents who objected would be viewed as discriminating against children identifying as another gender.

    3 - The Equality Act would eviscerate women’s and girls’ sports.

    Men and boys who identify as female could compete on women’s and girls’ athletic teams, easily snatching away choice championship awards and scholarships.

    For example, Selina Soule, a female runner from Connecticut, lost to males who claimed to identify as female in championship competitions. In addition to losing those races, she also lost out on scholarships for which she likely would have qualified had biological males not been permitted to compete against females.

    Studies have shown that male athletes who claim to be female still hold an “intolerable” advantage over females even though they have undergone cross-sex hormone treatments.

    4 - The Equality Act would be used to mandate school curricula that affirm and promote sexual orientation and gender identity views.

    Inside the classroom, the bill could allow for the normalization of gender ideology and abortion in school curricula.

    Melanie Israel of the Heritage Foundation explained at the Daily Signal that, under the Act, parental rights could take a far back seat to mandated school programs:

    The Equality Act could lead to changes in school curricula, such as texts that affirm and promote controversial sexual orientation and gender identity viewpoints.

    The Equality Act could also be used to override states that have prohibited sexual orientation and gender identity curricula. Where states have conversely mandated sexual orientation and gender identity curricula, parents and schools do not have access to “opt-out” options.
    Israel observed as well that Planned Parenthood, a giant of both the lucrative abortion and transgender medical industries, would likely have greater access to young people in sex education programs under a federal Equality Act.

    She elaborated on the possibilities:

    If the Equality Act were to become federal law and public school curricula become further entwined with sexual orientation and gender identity ideology, Planned Parenthood is well-positioned to further its presence in public schools and take advantage of an additional avenue to promote both sexual orientation and gender identity ideology as well as the organization’s hormone treatment services.

    In other words, additional sexual orientation and gender identity curricula could become yet another marketing tool for America’s abortion giant.
    5 - The Equality Act would be used to remove custody rights from parents who refuse to have their minor children undergo transgender medical interventions and procedures.

    The medical and psychological professions have become further politicized as transgender activists have infiltrated professional societies and associations.

    Monica Burke explained at the Heritage Foundation such politicization is creating increased conflict in relationships among parents, medical professionals, and government.

    “A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law would jeopardize parental rights nationwide,” Burke warned.

    Rep. Vicki Hartzler (R-MO) recalled during a presentation at the Heritage Foundation the story of parents in Ohio who lost custody of their daughter several years ago because they opposed her desire to transition to male. A judge allowed the girl’s grandparents to take custody of her because they supported her medical transition.

    “It is just heart rending to think that parents were not able to determine the health care, what they thought was best for their daughter, and the judge actually stepped in and took away their custody,” Hartzler said.

    “A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law would make these cases more common,” Burke said.

    6 - Since the Equality Act exempts itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, religious schools, hospitals, and adoption agencies could face federal sanctions for upholding their teachings with regard to life, sexuality, and marriage under the legislation.

    The legislation states:

    The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.) shall not provide a claim concerning, or a defense to a claim under, a covered title, or provide a basis for challenging the application or enforcement of a covered title.
    The Equality Act also states actions based on the belief in traditional marriage between a man and woman is “discrimination against a married same-sex couple” and relegates such faith beliefs to the status of a “sex stereotype that marriage should only be between heterosexual couples.”

    This language suggests faith-based adoption agencies that restrict adoptions to homes with a father and mother could be considered as “discriminating” against same-sex couples. A lawsuit alleging such discrimination would then have the weight of federal law behind it.

    Catholic League President Bill Donohue warned the Equality Act would “promote the most comprehensive assault on Christianity ever written into law.”

    Similarly, the U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Conference asserted the legislation would “discriminate against people of faith” and “punish faith-based organizations, such as charities and schools who serve everyone in their communities, simply because of their beliefs.”

    7 - The Equality Act’s text that names a form of “discrimination on the basis of pregnancy” would be used to punish healthcare providers who refuse to perform an abortion or to outlaw policies that ban funding for the procedure.

    The bill states:

    Discrimination can occur on the basis of the sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes. Each of these factors alone can serve as the basis for discrimination, and each is a form of sex discrimination.
    Israel explained the legislation would force the term “sex” in the Civil Rights Act to mean pregnancy, childbirth, or related conditions, and the last of these — “related medical conditions” — has already been interpreted to include abortion by both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

    Thus, discrimination on the basis of sex could include refusing to perform an abortion or provide funding for the procedure.

    Ryan Anderson, president of EPPC, called the Equality Act “legislative malpractice that turns equality on its head.”

    “It isn’t drafted as a shield to protect vulnerable minorities from unjust discrimination, but as a sword to persecute those who do not embrace new sexual and gender ideologies,” he asserted.

    Read more about the radical Equality Act here, here, here, and here.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-equality-act/
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,819
    Thanks (Given)
    34251
    Thanks (Received)
    26352
    Likes (Given)
    2315
    Likes (Received)
    9915
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    This is just not only nonsenical and unneccessary, but plain stupid. I identify with being President of the US, Jim as VP and NT as Speaker of the House. That of course would immediately render enough openings for other board members


  3. Likes jimnyc, icansayit liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,819
    Thanks (Given)
    34251
    Thanks (Received)
    26352
    Likes (Given)
    2315
    Likes (Received)
    9915
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    I was going to ask this in the Levine thread, but this is the same animal: Does anyone think God is actually on the side of the US anymore? This kind of stupid shit is no better than what they serve up in the ME.

  5. Thanks SassyLady, icansayit thanked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    At your Six
    Posts
    16,429
    Thanks (Given)
    24430
    Thanks (Received)
    11203
    Likes (Given)
    6054
    Likes (Received)
    4653
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13945534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I was going to ask this in the Levine thread, but this is the same animal: Does anyone think God is actually on the side of the US anymore? This kind of stupid shit is no better than what they serve up in the ME.


    God is always on the side of Good...`with belief` ..good things always happen...

    *Remember we are on Earth where "now" everything starts even between Good Bad & Evil.. He works in interesting ways as "He" sits and watches our given freedom of thought and actions...

    I know...

    Last edited by LongTermGuy; 02-28-2021 at 10:46 PM.



  7. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
    Likes icansayit liked this post
  8. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    USA East Coast
    Posts
    3,091
    Thanks (Given)
    3048
    Thanks (Received)
    2042
    Likes (Given)
    4798
    Likes (Received)
    1751
    Piss Off (Given)
    230
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6803333

    Default Yes Gunny. I know there are many who do not believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I was going to ask this in the Levine thread, but this is the same animal: Does anyone think God is actually on the side of the US anymore? This kind of stupid shit is no better than what they serve up in the ME.
    Having Faith (in the unseen) is about all most of us have left these days. IMO. God doesn't take sides. That's the easy way to deny for many.

    After all I have personally been through, plus my wife, and seeing the amazing birth of our two son's, and becoming the last member of my Immediate family. If I lost my Faith. I'd have nothing.
    I may be older than most. I may say things not everybody will like.
    But despite all of that. I will never lower myself to the level of Liars, Haters, Cheats, and Hypocrites.
    Philippians 4:13 I Can Do All Things Through Christ Who Strengthens Me:

  9. Thanks LongTermGuy, Gunny thanked this post
  10. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,819
    Thanks (Given)
    34251
    Thanks (Received)
    26352
    Likes (Given)
    2315
    Likes (Received)
    9915
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LongTermGuy View Post


    God is always on the side of Good...`with belief` ..good things always happen...

    *Remember we are on Earth where "now" everything starts even between Good Bad & Evil.. He works in interesting ways as "He" sits and watches our given freedom of thought and actions...

    I know...

    Quote Originally Posted by icansayit View Post
    Having Faith (in the unseen) is about all most of us have left these days. IMO. God doesn't take sides. That's the easy way to deny for many.

    After all I have personally been through, plus my wife, and seeing the amazing birth of our two son's, and becoming the last member of my Immediate family. If I lost my Faith. I'd have nothing.
    I wasn't thinking along the lines of personal Salvation. I am speaking more in the context of the Soddom and Gommorah we curently reside in.

  11. Likes icansayit liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums