Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    Your sillyass names will not hide the truth, girlie.

    History will prove my statement correct and it already does to an extent that confuses you into namecalling rather than intelligent discourse.

    Intelligent discourse with a PSYCHO? hahhahahahahhahaha

    History will certainly prove to be much more kind to President Bush, than it will to Clinton.

    Fact of the matter is, the LAW of the land was followed. Period.
    Fact of the matter is, electoral college got Kennedy elected in spite of less than 50% of the vote.

    Fact of the matter is, every recount done in Fla, shows that Bush won.

    Now go home you crying whiny ass cry baby, you guys are so full of rage because our supposed "stupid" President outsmarted and out manuevered your supposed "mental giants". President Bush, BOTH times, knew exactly which states he needed to win to win the election. Apparently your boys were too stupid and went home crying to moma.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Your rage does not disquise your sillyness, girlie.


    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    Intelligent discourse with a PSYCHO? hahhahahahahhahaha

    History will certainly prove to be much more kind to President Bush, than it will to Clinton.

    Fact of the matter is, the LAW of the land was followed. Period.
    Fact of the matter is, electoral college got Kennedy elected in spite of less than 50% of the vote.

    Fact of the matter is, every recount done in Fla, shows that Bush won.

    Now go home you crying whiny ass cry baby, you guys are so full of rage because our supposed "stupid" President outsmarted and out manuevered your supposed "mental giants". President Bush, BOTH times, knew exactly which states he needed to win to win the election. Apparently your boys were too stupid and went home crying to moma.
    History has already proven most of what your idiocies represent as incorrect. You are such a sillyass.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    Your rage does not disquise your sillyness, girlie.




    History has already proven most of what your idiocies represent as incorrect. You are such a sillyass.
    FROM answers.com

    "The Florida election recount of 2000 was a period of vote re-counting that occurred following the unclear results of the 2000 US presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, specifically the Florida results. The election was ultimately settled in favor of George W. Bush when the Supreme Court, with its final ruling on Bush v. Gore, stopped the recount. [1]


    Background
    The National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, sponsored by a consortium of major U.S. news organizations, conducted a Florida Ballot Project comprehensive review of all ballots uncounted (by machine) in the Florida 2000 presidential election, both undervotes and overvotes, with the main research aim being to report how different ballot layouts correlate with voter mistakes.

    The media companies involved were:

    Associated Press
    The New York Times
    The Wall Street Journal
    CNN
    St. Petersburg Times
    The Palm Beach Post
    The Washington Post
    Tribune Company
    Los Angeles Times
    Chicago Tribune
    Orlando Sentinel
    The Baltimore Sun

    Methodology
    Although the NORC study was not primarily intended as a determination of which candidate "really won", analysis of the results, given the hand counting of machine-uncountable ballots due to various types of voter error, indicated that they would lead to differing results, reported in the newspapers which funded the recount, such as The Miami Herald (The Miami Herald Report: Democracy Held Hostage) or the Washington Post [1].


    Results
    The findings were reported by the media during the week after November 12, 2001.

    All of the various county-by-county recounts had been requested by Gore or Bush. Neither candidate had formally requested a total statewide recount.

    The recount also showed that the only way that Al Gore could have tallied more votes was by using counting methods that were never requested, including "overvotes" — spoiled ballots containing more than one vote for an office. While some of these ballots recorded votes for two separate candidates, a significant number (20% in Lake County, for example) were cases of a voter voting for a candidate and then also writing in that same candidate's name on the write-in line.'


    From Wikipedia

    [edit] Results
    The findings were reported by the media during the week after November 12, 2001.

    All of the various county-by-county recounts had been requested by Gore or Bush. Neither candidate had formally requested a total statewide recount.

    The recount also showed that the only way that Al Gore could have tallied more votes was by using counting methods that were never requested, including "overvotes" — spoiled ballots containing more than one vote for an office. While some of these ballots recorded votes for two separate candidates, a significant number (20% in Lake County, for example) were cases of a voter voting for a candidate and then also writing in that same candidate's name on the write-in line.
    Last edited by LuvRPgrl; 01-09-2008 at 01:07 AM.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Jefferson, Georgia
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    172558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    You can absolve your guilt by referencing the electoral college, martin.




    But you can never convince me that the Florida, Ohio or even the New Mexico results were accurately reported or given. I can assure you that the actions of the USSC were partisan, unfair and without regard to the facts or the will of the citizens of the United States Of America. I can only guess as to why there weren't riots in the streets as a result.
    Ah..................................because we are civilized?
    If you continue to think the way you have always thought, you will continue to get what you have always got!

    A government big enough to provide you everything you need is big enough to take everything you have!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    san antonio
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9177

    Default

    Its funny how the rabid liberals still bitch about 2000. I guess the court was supposed to rule in favor of Gore, even though every recount showed Bush had more votes.

    And by the way, Florida did not detirmine the election, it only determined how Florida was going to vote. They had no control over how close the election was outside of Florida.
    PRAIRIE FIRE by William Ayers: Obama's guide to destory America
    "Maybe I missed that part of the Constitution"--Joe Steel
    You can't spell Liberals without Lies.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Exactly!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by emmett View Post
    Ah..................................because we are civilized?
    If you have been offended by this then as well!!!!!!!!!!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    Exactly!!!!!!!



    If you have been offended by this then as well!!!!!!!!!!

    Your ASSumptions are wrong as usual.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Obviously your memory is short. Did you remember the conservative mantra that includes all of us?



    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    Your ASSumptions are wrong as usual.
    Just for a reminder.

    Keep your own "ASSumptions" to yourself, lovergirl.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums