Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: First Gulf War

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,954
    Thanks (Given)
    34359
    Thanks (Received)
    26465
    Likes (Given)
    2379
    Likes (Received)
    9992
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default First Gulf War

    @NightTrain: As advertised

    You stated in so many words we should "finished the job" and taken out Saddam Hussein in 91. Yes, accomplished the mission, but in your opinion, we should have taken out Saddam then.

    Why not: there would have been no First Gulf War had GHWB not agree to OPECs conditions. We were conducting a training exercise called Desert Shield. We weren't there for any other reason until it morphed in Operation Desert Storm.

    GHWB had to agree to only remove Iraq's army from Kuwait. In return, coalition forces had unrestricted use of Arab airspace. We got to use Incirlik AB in Turkey and Turkish airspace in support of removing Iraqi forces from Kuwait. In order for any air assets from Europe to get to Northern Iraq, we needed that. Damned Turks half-threatening to take permission away every day They were a pain in the ass.

    We still have an air base in Bahrain. We have a base at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We have compounds for ships in Jebel Ali and Abu Dabi, UAE. We got those bases as part of not violating their conditions.

    Since taking out Saddam was never a goal and in fact by agreement was not a consideration, there was no "unfinished" job. Aside from everything else, I personally would not have been happy with us nt keeping our word. A deal's a deal.

    Strategically, Saddam was the joker in the deck in the Middle East. Yes, I know he was a POS scumbag that deserved to die. Big picture-wise, he was a Nationalist dictator that sat right between the shia and sunni (Saudi Arabia and Iran). It was predicted that if we removed Saddam it would create a power vacuum between Saudi Arabia, Syrai and Iran. The one thing Erdogan has ever said that is right is we DID upset the balance in the Middle East by removing Saddam.

    In that regard, I DID support winning in Iraq since we went in. Going in, as stated above, was the wrong thing to do. We had Saddam contained. We also already had an open front in Afghanistan. You don't unnecessarily open a second front. That's what cost Hitler WWII. You just don't unless you have to. Iraq was not a have to.

    The sunni and shia in Iraq are both proxies for Iran and Saudi Arabia. No telling what Turkey has done to the kurds. Civil war in Yemen.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. Thanks icansayit, NightTrain, fj1200 thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    12,787
    Thanks (Given)
    7730
    Thanks (Received)
    7699
    Likes (Given)
    818
    Likes (Received)
    2832
    Piss Off (Given)
    8
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19919859

    Default

    Food for thought

  4. Thanks Gunny, icansayit thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums