Homosexuality Now, Pedophilia Next

[Pale Rider]

Homosexuality Now, Pedophilia Next

Homosexuality has jumped out of the closet and into social acceptance. Today, sodomite behavior even enjoys legal protection and political preference. If you had told our grandparents thirty-five years ago that this would be the case, they would have laughed you out of the room.

Thirty-five years ago, the only people who were trumpeting the normalization of homosexuality were left-wing college professors. Few people took them seriously. That was a fatal mistake. We should have remembered Lincoln’s sage instruction:

"The philosophy of the classroom in one generation is the philosophy of the country in the next."

Who can deny that those liberal college professors in the 1960’s changed the direction of the entire nation? It behooves us, therefore, to give serious consideration to what liberal college and university professors are now promoting.

I'm told that in an article in the May/June issue of Society magazine entitled, "Sexual Liberation’s Last Frontier," Associate Professor of Sociology at Temple University, Julia Erickson calls for more tolerance and understanding for pedophiles. Yes, pedophiles. Erickson argues that the word pedophilia is too harsh and judgmental. She prefers using "child-adult sex." She questions research that shows long-term effects of such activity.

Erickson compares the plight of pedophiles to homosexuals in years gone by. She believes punishments inflicted upon pedophiles are too severe and suggests they need social acceptance, even legal protection, instead. You and I are making a serious miscalculation if we disregard people like Erickson as the lunatic fringe of society. We made that mistake thirty-five years ago, and look what has happened.

America has legally and culturally abandoned its Judeo/Christian roots. We have expunged traditional morality from the public square, and from the public conscience. Aberrant sexual misconduct of every kind has taken its place. Adultery, fornication, cohabitation and sodomy are socially acceptable, even politically protected. America currently has no moral compass.

Next on the list to achieve politically correct categorization is pedophilia. Understand that pedophilia is exactly where homosexuality was thirty-five years ago: in the classrooms of liberal college professors. If America doesn’t make a sudden and dramatic turn toward traditional [how about Biblical? - JZ] morality, pedophilia will enjoy the same kind of social and political acceptance that homosexuality now enjoys, and it won’t take thirty-five years to happen, either.

http://home.bluemarble.net/~heartcom...ualitynow.html

[Pale Rider]

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet2.html

[Bubbalicious]

you're insane

[Insein]

you're insane

you make such a persuasive argument.

The article does make alot of sense. Had it just been a gays =pedophiles case, i'd have said its a stretch. However, when college proffesors are actively promoting pedophilia as an acceptable act, then it is a serious matter. These people do shape the minds of others very easily. Looking at the last 50 years of this society and we can see many morally reprehensible behavior from the past now being seen as commonplace and even championed as superior to normal society.

[Pale Rider]

you're insane

Yeah I get it... this kind of information just slaps you liberal homo enablers in the face. Kind of hard to perpetuate your tepid line of diatribe against this kind of evidence.

[jillian]

Family Research Institute is real compelling.

[Bubbalicious]

LOL @ "liberal homo enablers"

Come up with a scientific source on something sometime so I might take you at least a little seriously. The Family Research Institute does not qualify.

Better yet, go outside for a while and stop thinking so hard about gay sex all the time.

[Hobbit]

Typical. You can't attack the facts, so you attack the source. This isn't supposed to be a 'scientific' article. It's supposed to be a social commentary. Thrity years ago, a fringe group of liberal professors suggested that homosexuality was normal and should be accepted or even endorsed by our laws. People laughed at them and never took them seriously, and now there's a movement to enact gay marriage across the country.

Now, a fringe group of liberal professors are saying the same things about pedophilia, and those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.

[OCA]

LOL @ "liberal homo enablers"

Come up with a scientific source on something sometime so I might take you at least a little seriously. The Family Research Institute does not qualify.

Better yet, go outside for a while and stop thinking so hard about gay sex all the time.

Attacking the source, how quintessentially lib.

Maybe you should try and refute it, or am I asking too much?

[TheStripey1]

Yeah I get it... this kind of information just slaps you liberal homo enablers in the face. Kind of hard to perpetuate your tepid line of diatribe against this kind of evidence.

you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

oh... I bet you did...

[gabosaurus]

you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

Not to mention all those Catholic priests.

[manu1959]

you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

oh... I bet you did...

not me did you forget about...barney frank, gary condit, neil goldschmidt, david giles....

[Pale Rider]

you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

oh... I bet you did...

And this proves what?

[Pale Rider]

you certainly haven't forgotten about mark foley have you?

oh... I bet you did...

Homosexuality and Pedophilia


By Cliff Kincaid | November 2, 2006

In connection with media coverage of the Mark Foley sex scandal, the pro-homosexual media enforcers have been attempting to refute the idea that there is any connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. Yet Foley targeted young boys. This is something you are not supposed to write or talk about because it undermines the cause of homosexual rights.

Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth says, "…isn't it telling most of the tiny number of homosexual male U.S. Congressmen have been caught in sex scandals-remember Barney Frank, who let his male lover, a hustler, run a prostitution ring out of his D.C. apartment? And Massachusetts Rep. Gerry Studds, who had sex with a 17-year-old boy and then turned his back on fellow House Members during the censure vote against him? And Bob Bauman, who in 1980 was charged with soliciting a 16-year-old boy for sex?"

Adding it up, LaBarbera says, "Let's see: three homosexual Congressmen involved in sexual seductions of minor boys-ages 16, 17, and 17 (Foley). And yet homosexual activists ridicule anyone who suggests there is a predatory or pedophilic component to male homosexuality…"

On October 2, when the supposed right-wing Fox News Channel aired a "debate" on the matter of the Foley scandal, the two sides were represented by liberal Democrat Bob Beckel, who got caught in a prostitution scandal, and lesbian Republican Tammy Bruce.

"Being homosexual has nothing to do with attraction to children," declared Bruce. "I agree. I agree," Beckel said.

But then she seemed to contradict herself, saying, "All I want frankly is a gay person in office who is not a sexual compulsive. I mean is that too much to ask for? I don't think it is."

Bruce has appeared at functions sponsored by the Log Cabin Republicans, the homosexual activist group whose executive director had defended Foley's refusal over the years to respond to questions about his homosexuality. Still, she recognized the "compulsive" nature of what has been happening on Capitol Hill.

On the O'Reilly Factor on October 9, homosexual activist Mike Rogers, a prominent advocate of "outing" secret gays, tried to deny the existence of any link between homosexuality and pedophilia. O'Reilly sounded dubious of that claim, at least in terms of what he said would be a public perception of the implications of the Foley case, but failed to cite any evidence to the contrary. However, Steven Baldwin wrote a scholarly piece for the Regent Law School review summarizing the evidence-mostly from the homosexual community-suggesting a strong link. Baldwin also tells me: "Proportionately, homosexual pedophiles are a far greater threat to society than are heterosexual pedophiles."

Yet the Washington Post, in an October 7 editorial, "Anti-Gay Ugliness," claimed that the "research on this topic, though small-scale and not recent, does not show that gay men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children." Significantly, it did not discuss or cite any research.

As bad as the Foley scandal is shaping up, it then turned out, according to the Washington Post itself, that homosexual Republican Rep. Jim Kolbe was close to several pages, and even opened his home to them (supposedly when he was away). This was reported in the process of disclosing that Kolbe knew of Foley's overtures to the pages six years ago. Kolbe's involvement with the pages was portrayed by the paper as entirely innocent, something that seems ridiculous on its face, considering the evidence already on the table.

The burden, it would seem, is on Kolbe to prove his hands are clean.

http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A4989_0_2_0_C/

[dirt mcgirt]

Aberrant sexual misconduct of every kind has taken its place. Adultery, fornication, cohabitation and sodomy are socially acceptable, even politically protected. America currently has no moral compass.

Cohabitation, fornication, and sodomy is aberrant sexual misconduct???? And they're henny pennying that pedophilia will become a social norm based on that???????

Here's what I think of the articles: