Page 2 of 47 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 699
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    246
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pale Rider View Post
    Aberrant sexual misconduct of every kind has taken its place. Adultery, fornication, cohabitation and sodomy are socially acceptable, even politically protected. America currently has no moral compass.
    Cohabitation, fornication, and sodomy is aberrant sexual misconduct???? And they're henny pennying that pedophilia will become a social norm based on that???????

    Here's what I think of the articles:

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumplestillskin View Post
    This is for Hobbit too. Please provide evidence from unbiased links, or if they are biased, ones that back up their assertions that:

    1) The ADA caved to political pressure.
    2) They ADA caved to financial pressure.
    3) Who put them under such pressure and why.
    4) Who were the individuals that provided the pressure and what "power" did they have.
    5) Why did these people put the ADA under pressure.
    6) Which members of the ADA resigned in protest at these pressures being put on them.

    Cheers

    BTW, homos are not perverts any more than you are.
    http://www.gayconspiracy.co.uk/page57.html

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ROFL! gayconspiracy.co.uk no - that can't possibly have a bias or agenda to it. LOL!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    246
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbalicious View Post
    ROFL! gayconspiracy.co.uk no - that can't possibly have a bias or agenda to it. LOL!
    Don't underestimate the power of the gay conspiracy and a second shooter.


  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbalicious View Post
    ROFL! gayconspiracy.co.uk no - that can't possibly have a bias or agenda to it. LOL!

    It says it all perfectly.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirt mcgirt View Post
    Don't underestimate the power of the gay conspiracy and a second shooter.


    Didn't read the article, did ya?

    Here let me help you out: www.readingcomprehensionfordummies.com

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    The pure truth of the matter is, homosexuality is a deviant, perverted lifestyle choice. If someone is to think that a man ramming his johnson up another mans brown eye is NORMAL, then with that sort of sick thinking, CERTAINLY the leap from that to fondling minors is just a small detail, because in the twisted mind of the queer, there's NOTHING wrong with it.

    I find people that defend faggots just as far out there and sick in the head as the faggot himself.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Here, there and everywhere
    Posts
    630
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FR..._pedo-sum.html

    Pro-Gay Bias In Study of Pedophilia
    Homosexuals are considerably more apt to involve themselves sexually with the underage. Anyone actually in contact with the phenomenon has to acknowledge this fact, perhaps most strongly explicated by the chairman of FRI in 1985.1 While homosexual spokesmen have disputed his conclusion, in a paper published in 2000 by Blanchard, Barbareee, Bogaert, Dicky, Klassen, Kuban, and Zucker2 the authors noted that the best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men..; in contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys.... Thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles" (p. 464). These figures are quite similar to those we at FRI have used since the early 1980s -- figures that for which gay activists have roundly criticized us. So how do Blanchard, et al., most of whom are from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto, handle this fact that seems so damaging to the homosexual cause? By telling people not to notice, or if they do, not to draw the obvious conclusions.

    .
    You really need to read your links before posting. This is the SECOND time on a homo thread you have done this. Done what, you might ask? Tried to rebut my link about Paul Cameron with a link that quotes him extensively. Those first two superscripted red numbers that act as reference points? Go down to the bottom of the piece. They are quoting Cameron's study. The one I just rebutted (with a little help from uber conservative BILL BENNETT). Try again...

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumplestillskin View Post
    You really need to read your links before posting. This is the SECOND time on a homo thread you have done this. Done what, you might ask? Tried to rebut my link about Paul Cameron with a link that quotes him extensively. Those first two superscripted red numbers that act as reference points? Go down to the bottom of the piece. They are quoting Cameron's study. The one I just rebutted (with a little help from uber conservative BILL BENNETT). Try again...

    Cameron's study is spot on.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirt mcgirt View Post
    Don't underestimate the power of the gay conspiracy and a second shooter.


    There may have been a couple of lesbians making out on the grassy knoll.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    246
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    215

    Default

    OH NOES MY PURITAN EYES ARE BURNING!!!!!1



    ^
    Totally fucking hot. Guess I'm abnormal. Oh well.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Here, there and everywhere
    Posts
    630
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Cameron's study is spot on.
    It has been extensively rebutted. When someone like Bill Bennett says it's suspect (let alone his peers have disowned him), his study has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese...

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirt mcgirt View Post
    OH NOES MY PURITAN EYES ARE BURNING!!!!!1



    ^
    Totally fucking hot. Guess I'm abnormal. Oh well.
    Homo enabler! I bet you're a sodomite too.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumplestillskin View Post
    It has been extensively rebutted. When someone like Bill Bennett says it's suspect (let alone his peers have disowned him), his study has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese...
    The research is spot on, flawless.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Here, there and everywhere
    Posts
    630
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    The research is spot on, flawless.
    It has been proven flawed. If you can disprove my assertion, be my guest. Take your time....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums