Conspiracy theories now medical journal headline

[revelarts]

safe & effective

[revelarts]

Fluoride in Water Poses “Unreasonable Risk” to Children, Federal Judge Rules


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...urt-Ruling.pdf


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.,..


https://vigilantnews.com/post/victor...l-judge-rules/

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

A federal judge rejected the EPA’s argument that the exact level at which fluoride is hazardous is too unclear to determine if the chemical presents an unreasonable risk, and ruled the agency must take regulatory action.
In a decision that could end the practice of water fluoridation in the U.S., a federal judge late Tuesday ruled that water fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can no longer ignore that risk, and must take regulatory action, Judge Edward Chen of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California wrote in the long-awaited landmark decision.

More than 200 million Americans drink water treated with fluoride at the “optimal” level of 0.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L). However, Chen ruled that a preponderance of scientific evidence shows this level of fluoride exposure may damage human health, particularly that of pregnant mothers and young children.

The verdict delivers a major blow to the EPA, public health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and professional lobbying groups like the American Dental Association (ADA), which have staked their reputations on the claim that water fluoridation is one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century and an unqualified public good.

Fluoride proponents refused to reexamine that stance despite mounting scientific evidence from top researchers and government agencies of fluoride’s neurotoxic risks, particularly for infants’ developing brains....

[revelarts]

--- A new national study from France found that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to a more than 20% increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding in the first three months following the primary vaccination series, Trial Site News reported.

The study, published in the October edition of Vaccines, “provides further support for the existence of an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding disorders following COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA vaccines,” the authors wrote.
Researchers from EPI-PHARE, part of the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and the French National Health Insurance, conducted a “case-control study” using comprehensive data from the French National Health Data System.
They were investigating how to better measure the risk of heavy menstrual bleeding following COVID-19 vaccination reported across the world soon after the vaccines were rolled out.
Dr. James Thorp, an obstetrician and gynecologist who has extensively documented harm to women from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, told The Defender the study was “comprehensive and well done,” for the subset of women that it studied, which included only women who were hospitalized for heavy menstrual bleeding...--

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-heavy-menstrual-bleeding-study/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defen der&utm_id=20240927

[revelarts]

“There was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine sound like it didn't work…
The spike protein is immunotoxic… When I give you an mRNA vaccine... I don't know how much spike protein you make...
I won't take the MRNA vaccines anymore.”

Fmr. CDC Director Robert Redfield:

[SassyLady]

“There was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine sound like it didn't work…
The spike protein is immunotoxic… When I give you an mRNA vaccine... I don't know how much spike protein you make...
I won't take the MRNA vaccines anymore.”

Fmr. CDC Director Robert Redfield:

The minute I heard the vax had mRNA I asked my doctor about it and based on that discussion I decided I wasn't going to alter my DNA for the flu.

[revelarts]

The minute I heard the vax had mRNA I asked my doctor about it and based on that discussion I decided I wasn't going to alter my DNA for the flu.

Yep
Early on when i heard a researcher say that the MRNA shots altered cell DNA & told our bodies to make Spike proteins, so our body's immune system could attack them... I didn't really hear much else. I had to relisten to get the rest of it.
I'm no doctor, but that sounded crazy to me.

Then the promoters later followed up with the comments saying
"It stays in the arm..."
Again I'm not a dr, but I thought how could that be true? they said
"it's stays a in the muscle tissue"
Ok...so a portion of your muscle is going to be producing Spike proteins... for how long?
-Crickets-
Then not long after the admissions started trickling out ...
"... Well some nurses are sloppy, they hit blood vessles so it goes all over the body"
"... Well it doesn't stay in the muscle, it does get into other parts of the body... "
"... Well it does get into breast milk..."
"... well it does cross the plecenta... and the brain blood barrier (if memory serves)...
"... well it it does alter your DNA...
"... well it will be passed on to your children and progeny forever...
"... But it's safe & effective so get your booster..."


Sorry, no.