Search on for anti-vax dad accused of hiding 7-yo daughter from COVID vax

[revelarts]

Search on for anti-vax dad accused of hiding 7-year-old daughter to keep her from being vaccinated

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...l34-story.html

The search is on for a 7-year-old Canadian girl whose mom says the child’s father absconded with the child to keep her from being vaccinated against COVID-19.
Educational assistant Mariecar Jackson tells the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that her ex-husband, Michael Jackson, is keeping their unvaccinated daughter in an undisclosed location so she can’t be inoculated.
Jackson said her ex-husband, who has joint custody of the girl, was supposed to have returned the second-grader to her mother’s custody nearly two months ago and did not. She last spoke to the girl by phone on Nov. 21. Saskatchewan judges have issued court orders demanding the child be returned to her mother, to no avail so far. Authorities went to the girl’s father’s home in Carievale, in Saskatchewan, but no one was there.

The divorce issue is one thing, parents divided over medical treatment is a old issue.

But in this case the state is wanting to forcing a still experimental drug on a child.
A drug that EVEN IF safe will have little to no benefit for the child since children are the VERY LEAST likely to have covid problems or deaths.
And the long term side effects of the drug on children are 100% unknown.

I understand the fathers actions, but i doubt he's going beat the state here... unless he's left the country.

[fj1200]

Where does it say that the state is wanting to force?

[revelarts]

Where does it say that the state is wanting to force?

you're right, the state "recommends" that all children 5 and up get a vaccine.
and the Canadain gov't only bans Unvaccinated travelers over the age of 12 from boarding a plane or passenger train in Canada, and a negative COVID-19 test will no longer serve as a substitute for most people.
In New Brunswick Malls, grocery stores, salons must enforce physical distancing or may instead require proof of vaccination from all patrons. And a Canadian court ruled "It would not be in the child's best interest to have contact with their father if he is not vaccinated and is opposed to health measures in the current epidemiological context," and the father lost the right to visit his 12-year-old in Quebec. And in Quebec this month the premier announced that it would be the first in the nation to financially penalize the unvaccinated. The fee has not yet been decided, but will be "significant", he said.
And workers fired for not having vaccine

also Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is pushing ahead with a vaccine mandate for international truckers despite increasing pressure from critics who say it will exacerbate driver shortages and drive up the price of goods imported from the United States.
basically if a trucker is not vaccinated he can't leave the country

among other restrictions.
All for the health of the nation of corse.

So yes, you are correct the state isn't exactly FORCING anyone to do anything.

[fj1200]

So yes, you are correct the state isn't exactly FORCING anyone to do anything.

So we're agreed; This is an abduction case. Granted with a covid subplot which is fodder for news, or at least a thread.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Where does it say that the state is wanting to force?

Why are you asking such a question?
Force is already being applied there in other ways.
Are you feigning ignorance of that reality?
Has not force already been applied not only there but here as well?
Perhaps it would serve you well not to speak to others as if a wizened old sage to an orphaned child of 6.
And yes, you asked a question as if you have no knowledge of the reality...
I've always found that to be an elitist attitude, and a haughty presumption of having a vast superiority over the one that the question is directed to. -Tyr

[fj1200]

Why are you asking such a question?
Force is already being applied there in other ways.
Are you feigning ignorance of that reality?
Has not force already been applied not only there but here as well?
Perhaps it would serve you well not to speak to others as if a wizened old sage to an orphaned child of 6.
And yes, you asked a question as if you have no knowledge of the reality...
I've always found that to be an elitist attitude, and a haughty presumption of having a vast superiority of the one that the question is directed to. -Tyr

Because that was the claim made with apparently no basis in reality. I'm sorry you're wrong about the rest of your post too.

But in this case the state is wanting to forcing a still experimental drug on a child.

[revelarts]

So we're agreed

technically if not Actually.

This is an abduction case.

This is a father trying rescue his daughter from medical abuse.
Harriett Tubman broke the law and was hunted as well for freeing herself then her parents and others.

Granted with a covid subplot which is fodder for news, or at least a thread.

Ummm Ok, just as slavery was the 'subplot' for rescuing her parents was for Harriett Tubman.
This man is rescuing his daughter from the ex-wife and state about to inject his daughter with an experimental drug.





I'm guessing you didn't watch the video above because you already know everything important already, and can't bother yourself to watch a video and must have someone spoon feed you transcripts or you'll feel justified in ignoring it.
But the summary is the the 12 year old child in the picture was severely injured by the "SAFE" vaccine
and her injury has not been officially recorded and they have not been compensated or helped by anyone.

[Gunny]

technically if not Actually.



This is a father trying rescue his daughter from medical abuse.
Harriett Tubman broke the law and was hunted as well for freeing herself then her parents and others.



Ummm Ok, just as slavery was the 'subplot' for rescuing her parents was for Harriett Tubman.
This man is rescuing his daughter from the ex-wife and state about to inject his daughter with an experimental drug.





I'm guessing you didn't watch the video above because you already know everything important already, and can't bother yourself to watch a video and must have someone spoon feed you transcripts or you'll feel justified in ignoring it.
But the summary is the the 12 year old child in the picture was severely injured by the "SAFE" vaccine
and her injury has not been officially recorded and they have not been compensated or helped by anyone.

You are comparing Harriet Tubman to a man who is refusing to abide by the terms of a divorce decree. That's going a bit far, even for your usual, anti-vax narrative. Let's not diminish the work of Tubman who assisted people fleeing actual, physical human bondage comparing it to some jerk violating the law based on his opinion.

[jimnyc]

When it comes to any divorce proceedings with a child involved - the child should always be of primary concern.

Outside of the vaccine, I can't imagine that's first and foremost at the front of Mom's mind. I'm sure at this point she more so just wants to see her child.

So she MUST be granted access and it allowed by the husband. Since they are unable to come to agreement, then unfortunately courts will need to become involved. It sounds like they may tell Dad she needs to get the vaccine. I don't know how I feel about that. But again, first comes the child and what is best for her is to be with both of her parents.

I will certainly disagree if the courts force upon her any vaccine that she doesn't want given the fact that it's not your typical vaccine. A shame that Mom and Dad couldn't come to a resolution that they both agreed upon, but this happens in divorce cases & the poor kids get yanked left and right.

[fj1200]

technically if not Actually.



This is a father trying rescue his daughter from medical abuse.
Harriett Tubman broke the law and was hunted as well for freeing herself then her parents and others.



Ummm Ok, just as slavery was the 'subplot' for rescuing her parents was for Harriett Tubman.
This man is rescuing his daughter from the ex-wife and state about to inject his daughter with an experimental drug.


I'm guessing you didn't watch the video above because you already know everything important already, and can't bother yourself to watch a video and must have someone spoon feed you transcripts or you'll feel justified in ignoring it.
But the summary is the the 12 year old child in the picture was severely injured by the "SAFE" vaccine
and her injury has not been officially recorded and they have not been compensated or helped by anyone.

You're trying to hard. It's an abduction case.