Registered nurse nicole sirotek

[revelarts]

REGISTERED NURSE NICOLE SIROTEK FROM WHAT SHE VIEWED “HOSPITALS HAVE BECOME worse than Prisons.”


http://www.bitchute.com/video/6Y4cjCkQpBph/


SHOCKING: Hospitals / Not Giving Patients Food Or Water / Following Orders They Know Are Not Healthy For The Patients/ American Healthcare Has Become Worse Then A Third World Country....

Nurse testimony before Senator ron Johnson
shocking
you won't find this on MSM

[revelarts]

COVID-19: A Second Opinion panel with Senator Ron Johnson
Attorney Thomas Renz reveals what multiple DoD whistleblowers have provided on the safety of the vaccines.

Within the military the whistleblower Drs have documented that after the vaccines,
Miscarriages are up 300%
Cancer increase by almost 300%
Neurological Issues are up 1000% (82000 per year up to 800,000+ in 1 year)
The department of defence has been monitoring and providing information.


http://rumble.com/vt82p2-thomas-renz...-on-the-s.html

[Gunny]

Edit: Never fucking mind. You're losing it and becoming that which you rail about.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Edit: Never fucking mind. You're losing it and becoming that which you rail about.

Unless those testifying are willing to be crucified for lying -then one must at least accept that there is an ongoing problem.
I find it hard as hell to believe that these people are putting their careers on the line to get up there and lie!
And some may even be putting their lives on the line, imho.
This corrupt administration is ruled by overseers that care not a damn whit for law or for the possibility of any punishment for what they do.

And one must ask, why would these whistleblowers do this, if not for altruistic reasons?
This dem party engages in treason every fffking hour of every fkking day, A fact.----Tyr

[Gunny]

Unless those testifying are willing to be crucified for lying -then one must at least accept that there is an ongoing problem.
I find it hard as hell to believe that these people are putting their careers on the line to get up there and lie!
And some may even be putting their lives on the line, imho.
This corrupt administration is ruled by overseers that care not a damn whit for law or for the possibility of any punishment for what they do.

And one must ask, why would these whistleblowers do this, if not for altruistic reasons?
This dem party engages in treason every fffking hour of every fkking day, A fact.----Tyr

Like Hillary?

I need to testify before Congress if that's all it takes to make something gospel

[fj1200]

And one must ask, why would these whistleblowers do this, if not for altruistic reasons?

Altruistic reasons do not make them correct.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Like Hillary?

I need to testify before Congress if that's all it takes to make something gospel

I still like my reasoning in pondering as to why would they lie.
Hillar lies because she is a corrupt POS covering up her crimes.
There is no such stigma attached to these doctors that we know of.
Their word against that of the dems/o'biden crew.. hmm let me think, who should/would I believe
if betting my life on it..??
Easy answer.
These fkking vermin I'd never believe, their past history and bad reputation means a lot to me. ...-Tyr

[icansayit]

Both my wife and I have personally spoken with several nurses, and even doctors over the last year about COVID. And all of them agreed (with the promise of not using their names or what hospital they are in) That the Administrations of most local hospitals MUST....I repeat....MUST call nearly every person who comes to the hospital Emergency room, or to wait for a Doctor to be seen,
ANOTHER COVID 19 NUMBER...in order to receive the Federal Assistance Funding promised in 2019 and afterward.

Bottom line (also from nurses and docs) As long as they CLAIM covid is related to all visits, both the STATE and the FED will continue to provide funding for the hospitals.

As for getting rid of nurses, and other staff due to NO-SHOTS...The DOLLARS are much more important than the PEOPLE who work there.
All of this is true, and factual. I SWEAR!

[revelarts]

Altruistic reasons do not make them correct.

Makes them instantly more credible than Gates, Fauci, Pfizer etc..
who all have millions to billions in financial interest riding on what they sell... cough.. say.

Also, AS ALWAYS, the evidence, the data they present is what really matters. Is it true, false, partly true, partly false?
It's Not about their assumed motives or even the obvious corruption and lies of the other parties.

I'd be happy to hear/see any clear refutations of the testimonies and info presented.
the nurse reported what she SAW. I saw the viral video she mentions. I've seen other nurse's testimonies from NYC that align with what she said. There are even some cellphone videos that nurses took of other staff NOT treating patients with the same level (humane level) of care and justifying it as "just following orders"

the lawyer presented data what he was given by multiple DOD whistleblowers who had access to raw data of the vaccines effects on military personnel. (the lawyer elsewhere also presents data given to him from other records and raw data from the CDC that shows the numbers of deaths from vaccines presented to the public by the CDC is false.)

[Gunny]

I still like my reasoning in pondering as to why would they lie.
Hillar lies because she is a corrupt POS covering up her crimes.
There is no such stigma attached to these doctors that we know of.
Their word against that of the dems/o'biden crew.. hmm let me think, who should/would I believe
if betting my life on it..??
Easy answer.
These fkking vermin I'd never believe, their past history and bad reputation means a lot to me. ...-Tyr

To push an agenda.

"Stigma" as in "agenda"? All they have to be is anti-vaxxers pushing the same crap on their side the "vaccinate anything that moves" side. I don't believe ANY of them, on either side because both sides want the same thing: to force their will on everyone.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

To push an agenda.

"Stigma" as in "agenda"? All they have to be is anti-vaxxers pushing the same crap on their side the "vaccinate anything that moves" side. I don't believe ANY of them, on either side because both sides want the same thing: to force their will on everyone.

Yet why would one--assume-- they are anti-vaxxers?
Maybe they are simply tired of the ffking lies and what government is doing.
I am an anti-vaxxer does that mean I push an agenda or lie ??
I will tell you this, I never lie in debating- it is 100% dishonorable to do so- in fact it is exactly what the dem/lib/leftists do.
Is everybody that speaks against the vaccine to be automatically assumed to be lying???
Maybe those doctors and nurses are simply stating what they have seen...
Seems we each have to decide which side is the liar...
I bet my life it is the o'biden bastard and the ffking government.-- --Tyr

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Altruistic reasons do not make them correct.

Makes them to be far, far more than likely to be correct than the other side- the known lying bastards, imho.
I'll lay my money on the ones exposing the ffking scam.
And spit on the worthless, lying bastards that are running the ffking scam..- Tyr

[SassyLady]

Edit: Never fucking mind. You're losing it and becoming that which you rail about.

Presenting info from whistle-blowers equals losing it?

Snowden? Assange? No one wanted to believe the info they released and yet they are criminals for doing just that?

Nowadays they don't turn you into criminals, they just cancel you, defund you, suspend your credentials or claim you're delusional.

You can say you don't believe the info being presented but please don't denigrate someone because they present alternate info from what the MSM is cramming down our throats.

[fj1200]

Makes them instantly more credible than Gates, Fauci, Pfizer etc..
who all have millions to billions in financial interest riding on what they sell... cough.. say.

Also, AS ALWAYS, the evidence, the data they present is what really matters. Is it true, false, partly true, partly false?
It's Not about their assumed motives or even the obvious corruption and lies of the other parties.

I'd be happy to hear/see any clear refutations of the testimonies and info presented.
the nurse reported what she SAW. I saw the viral video she mentions. I've seen other nurse's testimonies from NYC that align with what she said. There are even some cellphone videos that nurses took of other staff NOT treating patients with the same level (humane level) of care and justifying it as "just following orders"

the lawyer presented data what he was given by multiple DOD whistleblowers who had access to raw data of the vaccines effects on military personnel. (the lawyer elsewhere also presents data given to him from other records and raw data from the CDC that shows the numbers of deaths from vaccines presented to the public by the CDC is false.)

No it doesn't. Their credibility here is 100% correlated to whether you agree with them or not. They may present data and evidence but if it doesn't meet a standard of scientific discovery then it's at best anecdotal.

I agree that they have data but did I see one stat with cancer diagnoses up 300%? I dare say that's pretty well impossible to link to the vaccine. I would suspect that someone got the vaccine, started complaining about something, a doctor did some looking and found that they had some sort of cancer. Voila; vaccines bad? I suspect that the cancer existed prior to the vaccine but isn't discoverable until someone had a reason to look for it. Correlation does not equal causation.

Makes them to be far, far more than likely to be correct than the other side- the known lying bastards, imho.
I'll lay my money on the ones exposing the ffking scam.
And spit on the worthless, lying bastards that are running the ffking scam..- Tyr

No it doesn't. They likely do not have the entire picture of what is going on. They see what they see and make conclusions which may not be valid when presented against the entirety of the evidence. You have a worldview and found something that validates it so you assign altruistic motives to the presenter.

I remember lawsuits against silicone breast implant manufacturers (90s?) that their product caused cancer and anyone who had that cancer said, "I am the evidence." In reality the incidence of cancer in those ladies was the same as the general population that did not have implants. They may have been "evidence" but they were not the whole picture. I suspect the same outcome with all the talcum powder lawsuits.

[revelarts]

...
I agree that they have data but did I see one stat with cancer diagnoses up 300%? I dare say that's pretty well impossible to link to the vaccine. I would suspect that someone got the vaccine, started complaining about something, a doctor did some looking and found that they had some sort of cancer. Voila; vaccines bad? I suspect that the cancer existed prior to the vaccine but isn't discoverable until someone had a reason to look for it. Correlation does not equal causation.

"you'd dare say"...
you mean you'd guess... that the military doctors just made up a 300% increase.
sorry I don't find your daring guess credible or backed by anything but your own bias to dimiss any info you don't like.

No it doesn't. They likely do not have the entire picture of what is going on. They see what they see and make conclusions which may not be valid when presented against the entirety of the evidence. You have a worldview and found something that validates it so you assign altruistic motives to the presenter.

"may not" you have no evidence to the contrary so assumption of other evidence is simply a HOPE on your part.
while the drs nurses and researchers presenting the evidence are using ALL the gov'ts on data AND their long experience ON the ground with covid patients.

And we know that Facui the CDC and WHO have vigorously suppressed, and cherry picked data.
And literally lied to us all (for our own good) about many things since the beginning of the covid1984.

that gives the people presenting MORE credibility simply BY CONTRAST FJ.

If you've got these 2 guys


telling you one thing and some new kid telling you a different story, the new kid has more credibility by DEFAULT everytime.

I remember lawsuits against silicone breast implant manufacturers (90s?) that their product caused cancer and anyone who had that cancer said, "I am the evidence." In reality the incidence of cancer in those ladies was the same as the general population that did not have implants. They may have been "evidence" but they were not the whole picture. I suspect the same outcome with all the talcum powder lawsuits.

I remember
cigarette companies, asbestos companies, Opioid companies... that is Pharmaceutical companies all backed by the CDC and FDA approval saying their products were safe and effective until whistle blowers and other drs and researchers showed otherwise
and even showed that the companies and even some gov't bodies knew it... for decades in some cases.