Global Death Rates Are Skyrocketing! Why?

[revelarts]

One of the most vaxxed counties in America faces a heart attack crisis.
98% of people in King County, WA (Seattle) took at least one COVID shot, and the data is not looking good.

A peer-reviewed study has found a jaw-dropping 1,236% surge in excess heart attack deaths among King County's 2.2 million residents.
•2020: 11 excess heart attack deaths
•2021: 75 excess heart attack deaths
•2022: 111 excess heart attack deaths
•2023: 147 excess heart attack deaths, a 1,236% increase compared to 2020.

Moreover, cardiac arrest deaths, in general, rose about 25% from 2020 to 2023. In the same time frame, King County's population shrunk slightly.
Reflecting on this alarming data, Dr. Peter McCullough said, “So it looks like the vaccines are the smoking gun.”
“This is now fully peer-reviewed in the emergency medicine literature. We've messaged the Medic One unit in Seattle. They clearly need to do more research to figure out how soon these vaccines were administered and to whom.”

https://vigilantnews.com/post/heavil...-grim-reality/



& I wonder about heart attacks without deaths, heart damage and the other side effects and long term effects?


oh well, 2 months of protection =
Acceptable Risk... Collateral Damage... Safe & Effective

[fj1200]

COVID-19 Is a Coronary Artery Disease Risk Equivalent and Exhibits a Genetic Interaction With ABO Blood Type

While our results point to interesting clinical and genetic associations with COVID-19, we also note certain limitations of our study. First, defining cases and appropriate controls using data from the UK Biobank requires special consideration, given how the original SARS-CoV-2 strain and its virulence have evolved over time, improvements in patient care since the beginning of the pandemic, and development of vaccines in early 2021. For these reasons, and due to the unavailability of complete data on vaccination dates or the SARS-CoV-2 strain that UK Biobank subjects were infected with, we only used cases who developed COVID-19 before the availability of COVID-19 vaccines.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full...AHA.124.321001

[fj1200]

Looks like it starts to kick up before the vaccine came out.

[revelarts]

[fj1200]

You do know that those are two different and distinct things right? Why do you ignore one correlation and completely focus on another?

[fj1200]

Risk of Worsening Heart Failure and All-Cause Mortality Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Heart Failure: A Nationwide Real-World Safety Study

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.010617

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients with heart failure are vulnerable to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, limited evidence exists on the safety of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in this patient population. The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of all-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, venous thromboembolism, and myocarditis associated with the mRNA vaccines in patients with heart failure.
METHODS:

Using Danish nationwide registries, 2 cohorts were constructed: (1) all prevalent heart failure patients in 2019 aged 40 to 95 years and (2) all prevalent heart failure patients in 2021 aged 40 to 95 years, who were vaccinated with either of the 2 mRNA vaccines (BNT162B2 or mRNA-1273). The patients in the 2 cohorts were matched 1:1 using exact exposure matching on age, sex, and duration of heart failure. To estimate standardized absolute risks, outcome-specific Cox regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS:

The total study population comprised 101 786 patients. The median age of the study population was 74 years (interquartile range, 66–81). The standardized risk of all-cause mortality within 90 days was 2.23% (95% CI, 2.10%–2.36%) in the vaccinated cohort and 2.56% (95% CI, 2.43%–2.70%) in the unvaccinated cohort (90-day risk difference, −0.33% [95% CI, −0.52% to −0.15%]). The standardized risk of worsening heart failure within 90 days was 1.10% (95% CI, −1.01% to 1.19%) in the 2021 (vaccinated) cohort and 1.08% (95% CI, 0.99%–1.17%) in the 2019 (unvaccinated) cohort (risk difference, 0.02% [95% CI, −0.11% to 0.15%]). No significant differences were found regarding venous thromboembolism or myocarditis.
CONCLUSIONS:

Receiving an mRNA vaccine was not associated with an increased risk of worsening heart failure, myocarditis, venous thromboembolism, or all-cause mortality.

[fj1200]

Myocarditis risk significantly higher after COVID-19 infection vs. after a COVID-19 vaccine

Among almost 43 million people in England who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, the risk of myocarditis was substantially higher in the four weeks after COVID-19 infection than after a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, according to new study in Circulation
https://newsroom.heart.org/news/myoc...vid-19-vaccine

[fj1200]

Myocarditis seven times more likely with COVID-19 than vaccines

https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/myocarditis-seven-times-more-likely-covid-19-vaccines

“Our findings show that the risk of myocarditis from being infected by COVID-19 is far greater than from getting the vaccine,” said Dr. Navya Voleti, a resident physician in the Department of Medicine at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. “Moving forward, it will be important to monitor the potential long-term effects in those who develop myocarditis.”
...
The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients, regardless of vaccination status, compared to individuals who did not contract the virus.