US scientists repeat fusion ignition breakthrough for 2nd time

[fj1200]

Go ask China that question or even India... as both are greatly, too far over populated . A FACT.--Tyr

There's a difference between fact and opinion. I'll put you down with Malthus and Ehrlich.

[Gunny]

No.

Smoke and mirrors argument, depending on what numbers one uses.

If you take square mileage of the globe and divide it by population then it is not overpopulated.

If you take inhabitable areas and divide it by the population then it probably is.

If you take inhabited areas and divide it by the population it's disgustingly overpopulated.

If you take inhabited areas and match them against the ecological capacity to support, definitely overpopulated.

Just about anywhere there is are natural resources that support life on this planet there's a colony of Earthmen living like fireants.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

There's a difference between fact and opinion. I'll put you down with Malthus and Ehrlich.

Aha, Malthus and Ehrlich will be so pleased that they are now in good company = ME! --Tyr

[AHZ]

Aha, Malthus and Ehrlich will be so pleased that they are now in good company = ME! --Tyr

im sorry thats nazi satanic bullcrap.

the earth is not overpopulated.

thats satan speaking.

there are some regional messes, but overall, the planet is capable.

the real problem is the elite are not willing, and prefer genocide, in the fog of their own power-obsessed madness.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

im sorry thats nazi satanic bullcrap.

the earth is not overpopulated.

thats satan speaking.

there are some regional messes, but overall, the planet is capable.

the real problem is the elite are not willing, and prefer genocide, in the fog of their own power-obsessed madness.

I disagree with that statement. China and India are both overpopulated. It boils down to how one defines overpopulation, imho.
When you have tens of millions in your country BARELY living hand to mouth, you are overpopulated. When you have large numbers starving you are overpopulated.
Both of those countries have that. And I did no even name Africa! --Tyr

[AHZ]

I disagree with that statement. China and India are both overpopulated. It boils down to how one defines overpopulation, imho.
When you have tens of millions in your country BARELY living hand to mouth, you are overpopulated. When you have large numbers starving you are overpopulated.
Both of those countries have that. And I did no even name Africa! --Tyr

there is enough food.

there is a distribution and a genocide problem from global elites trying to murder.

now theyre restricting supply even more , to kill more.

it's a made up evil lie made up by psychotics.

the carrying capcity of earth is very great. we focus our technologies on murder instead of agriculture.

this is a necromonger / nihilist society.

be1c0285afa528b6a2e8656c44309dc4.jpg

[fj1200]

Smoke and mirrors argument, depending on what numbers one uses.

If you take square mileage of the globe and divide it by population then it is not overpopulated.

If you take inhabitable areas and divide it by the population then it probably is.

If you take inhabited areas and divide it by the population it's disgustingly overpopulated.

If you take inhabited areas and match them against the ecological capacity to support, definitely overpopulated.

Just about anywhere there is are natural resources that support life on this planet there's a colony of Earthmen living like fireants.

I believe in the ingenuity of man. Constant advancement has us feeding 8bb people in the world and besides global population is trending to peak at 10bbish between 2050 and 2100. And then decline. Plenty of countries and even continents are in decline already and the decline IMO is due to economic advancement.

I heard a stat awhile back that the entire population could live in TX, with a decent sized yard, leaving the rest of the globe for food production. I know you'll love your new neighbors.

[fj1200]

Aha, Malthus and Ehrlich will be so pleased that they are now in good company = ME! --Tyr

Malthus would be astounded how many people are living on planet earth compared to his time and Ehrlich made a bet and lost in the 80's. They both might have changed their mind by now.

I disagree with that statement. China and India are both overpopulated. It boils down to how one defines overpopulation, imho.
When you have tens of millions in your country BARELY living hand to mouth, you are overpopulated. When you have large numbers starving you are overpopulated.
Both of those countries have that. And I did no even name Africa! --Tyr

China is declining in population already and would like to reverse the trend and India would I think disagree with your statement. Africa's problem is a reliance on government which is generally the problem with starvation in the world.

[fj1200]

there is enough food.

there is a distribution and a genocide problem from global elites trying to murder.

now theyre restricting supply even more , to kill more.

it's a made up evil lie made up by psychotics.

the carrying capcity of earth is very great. we focus our technologies on murder instead of agriculture.

this is a necromonger / nihilist society.

Something I can almost agree with and then... Wow!

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

there is enough food.

there is a distribution and a genocide problem from global elites trying to murder.

now theyre restricting supply even more , to kill more.

it's a made up evil lie made up by psychotics.

the carrying capcity of earth is very great. we focus our technologies on murder instead of agriculture.

this is a necromonger / nihilist society.

be1c0285afa528b6a2e8656c44309dc4.jpg

My friend, I was not arguing about current food supply or farming.
Yes, capacity could support the world easily if properly managed, imho, it is government and culture in those starving populations in those nations.--Tyr

[AHZ]

My friend, I was not arguing about current food supply or farming.
Yes, capacity could support the world easily if properly managed, imho, it is government and culture in those starving populations in those nations.--Tyr

yes, a nihilist culture dominated by western eugenicist nations.

[Kathianne]

yes, a nihilist culture dominated by western eugenicist nations.

Now, once again, we're getting to how 'bad' Western Civ., i.e., America and cohorts are.

How about just coming out with what your economic solution is, beyond tariffs? I'm beginning to think the advocacy of such is just a warped attempt to get US to implement a self-destroying policy.

[AHZ]

Now, once again, we're getting to how 'bad' Western Civ., i.e., America and cohorts are.

How about just coming out with what your economic solution is, beyond tariffs? I'm beginning to think the advocacy of such is just a warped attempt to get US to implement a self-destroying policy.

it's just the war machine fascist elites, not the regular american people.

globalists are anti-human no matter where they are from.

most people are good. we're not actually "all to blame".

the oligarchs are in their own separate hell.

tariffs are the solution for american workers right now, the 1930s aside and irrelevant.

[Kathianne]

it's just the war machine fascist elites, not the regular american people.

globalists are anti-human no matter where they are from.

most people are good. we're not actually "all to blame".

the oligarchs are in their own separate hell.

tariffs are the solution for american workers right now, the 1930s aside and irrelevant.

Got those words out of your system? Good. Now, to what I actually asked above, be responsive please:

How about just coming out with what your economic solution is, beyond tariffs? I'm beginning to think the advocacy of such is just a warped attempt to get US to implement a self-destroying policy.

[AHZ]

Got those words out of your system? Good. Now, to what I actually asked above, be responsive please:

it's mostly just tariffs.

that's my solution.


im sorry you are programmed against seeing the obvious solution by globalists.

you can't ban me for having a different idea than you.