Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,599
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475522

    Default Wrong Comparison? Not 9/11, Rather Dunkirk

    Interesting read:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/this-is...hare_permalink

    This Isn’t Israel’s 9/11. It’s DunkirkThe Jewish state’s position is far more perilous than that of the U.S. in 2001.
    By Ashley Rindsberg
    Oct. 11, 2023 6:00 pm ET


    Israel Defense Force soldiers wait in a trench, ready to fire, near the border with Gaza, Oct. 10. PHOTO: ALEXI J. ROSENFELD/GETTY
    A metaphor quickly emerged after Hamas’s barbarous attack casting it as Israel’s 9/11. That’s the day we will look back on, dividing the before and after times. This misses the mark. Oct. 7 is our Dunkirk—the decisive start of a massive and prolonged war of survival, the beginning of a historic test whose outcome is still uncertain.


    OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH
    WSJ Opinion Potomac Watch
    Hamas' Surprise Attack Pushes Israel to War

    The reason the 9/11 metaphor falls down is simple: Israel isn’t America. The attack on the twin towers and Pentagon was isolated in time. In response, the U.S. had total freedom to maneuver. It could have simply sat out the fight. The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, a sustained chain of operations abroad and some internal soul-searching would have produced an acceptable result from a national-security standpoint.


    Israel has no such luxury. Neither in geography nor in time can the country take a wait-and-watch approach. With jihadists marauding through southern Israel as if we had been vaulted back to the Middle Ages, and with 130,000 Lebanese rockets trained on Israeli population centers, we are in the fight of our lives.


    That’s why Dunkirk is the more precise parallel. Britain understood that getting its soldiers home was a life-and-death matter, not only for them but for the country. Without a serviceable fighting force, Britain couldn’t have fought the Nazi machine.

    ...


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks Gunny, fj1200 thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,979
    Thanks (Given)
    34370
    Thanks (Received)
    26486
    Likes (Given)
    2386
    Likes (Received)
    10007
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    A good observation. Not sure Dunkirk is any better comparison that 9/11 though. At Dunkirk the French and Brits were shoved off the continent into the sea. Dunkirk was also the culmination of Nazi aggression vs ineffective defenses.

    Israel has been blindsided like we were, but similarities end there. Indeed Israel is in for a prolonged war, especially if it destroys Gaza. That will be the next, "new" rallying cry for the terrorists.

    Israel needs to level Gaza now while it had public sentiment mostly on its side. The longer it drags out, the more that fickle, in the moment sentiment is apt to change.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. Thanks Kathianne, fj1200 thanked this post
    Likes Kathianne liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums