That'll Show 'Em

[revelarts]

[/INDENT]Ask yourself the likelihood of the results after 2 years of reduced care due to lockdowns or due to the vaccine with less time to act? And if the vaccination rate didn't exceed 80% of the Japanese population then I'd say you have a built in control group. Nevertheless will you update the results if it becomes likely the former or only if it becomes likely the latter?

I have no problem updating results if more evidence changes the current picture.
Will you accept the evidence as it appears TODAY?

...These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown...

[fj1200]

I have no problem updating results if more evidence changes the current picture.
Will you accept the evidence as it appears TODAY?

...These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown...

The evidence doesn't say anything now other than correlation and correlating to multiple possibilities, some stated and some not. I'm expecting that if the evidence changes the picture then it won't be making the internet rounds.

[revelarts]

The evidence doesn't say anything now other than correlation and correlating to multiple possibilities, some stated and some not. I'm expecting that if the evidence changes the picture then it won't be making the internet rounds.

really?
So the real answer is "no" you won't accept the evidence today.

If that's NOT what you're saying well I guess IF new evidence comes out showing otherwise i can always quote your political spokespersons like comment here as my reply.

"The evidence doesn't say anything now other than correlation and correlating to multiple possibilities, some stated and some not."

[fj1200]

really?
So the real answer is "no" you won't accept the evidence today.

If that's NOT what you're saying well I guess IF new evidence comes out showing otherwise i can always quote your political spokespersons like comment here as my reply.

"The evidence doesn't say anything now other than correlation and correlating to multiple possibilities, some stated and some not."

Please don't try to restate my words which were already quite clear. FWIW I don't have political spokespersons and I also don't overinterpret studies or hang my hat on "... may be..."

[revelarts]

A newly published Japanese study confirms UK Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London Angus Dalgleish’s concerns about mRNA injections causing cancer:

"A paper was published out of Japan and it was the Japan's Office of National Statistics, which don't hide, meddle, fiddle...But it shows absolutely clearly that the cancer incidence has gone up in Japan just due to the vaccine program. They've correlated it absolutely beautifully. I'm alarmed by it because they've done it on deaths...but they've picked it up within 2 years. It's highly significant increase of the cancers and everybody else is starting to see this now...And I was just delighted that so many people from around the world all over the world have published data showing how boosters in particular can suppress your immune response and actually drive cancers that you have but didn't know you had, as it were."

his comments from 2023 I believe.
"At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.

Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.

So why are these cancers occurring?
T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.

To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now."

Angus Dalgleish
FRCP FRCPath FMedSci is a professor of oncology at St George's, University of London,
best known for his contributions to HIV/AIDS research.

[fj1200]

... study confirms... correlated it absolutely beautifully...

The former does not equal the latter.

[SassyLady]

The former does not equal the latter.

Doesn't negate it either.

[fj1200]

Doesn't negate it either.

Actually the definitions of words do negate it as presented.

"... the cancer incidence has gone up in Japan just due to the vaccine program. They've correlated it absolutely beautifully. "

Correlation is not causation. I thought you gave some credence to the Great Barrington Declaration. If I'm not mistaken it drew a line between not going to regular doctor appointments with increases in other diseases/cancer?.