Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,090
    Thanks (Given)
    34501
    Thanks (Received)
    26576
    Likes (Given)
    2468
    Likes (Received)
    10080
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    371 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475528

    Default What we learned from Trump’s surprisingly good day at the Supreme Court

    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,996
    Thanks (Given)
    4255
    Thanks (Received)
    4611
    Likes (Given)
    1438
    Likes (Received)
    1105
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173681

    Default

    “If an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy?” Alito said.

    Sotomayor followed with a counterpoint.

    “A stable democratic society needs the good faith of its public officials. That good faith assumes that they will follow the law. There is no fail-safe system of government,” Sotomayor said. “We have a judicial system that has layers and layers and layers of protection for accused defendants in the hopes that the innocent will go free. We fail, routinely. But we succeed more often than not.”
    “If it fails completely,” she added wistfully, “it’s because we’ve destroyed our democracy on our own.”
    The problem with the former is not that prosecutions occur but that prosecutions occur that aren't applied equally.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_prosecution

    And the problem with the latter is that a requirement is the good faith of the prosecutors.

    All that being said, trump is a buffoon.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  3. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,090
    Thanks (Given)
    34501
    Thanks (Received)
    26576
    Likes (Given)
    2468
    Likes (Received)
    10080
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    371 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    The problem with the former is not that prosecutions occur but that prosecutions occur that aren't applied equally.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_prosecution

    And the problem with the latter is that a requirement is the good faith of the prosecutors.

    All that being said, trump is a buffoon.
    Lot of that two-tier justice system going around lately.

    If the Supreme Court kicks it back to the lower courts for clarifications that drag out past the election, Trump gets what he wants provided he wins in Nov. He's got a LOT riding on that bet.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. Thanks Kathianne, fj1200 thanked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,996
    Thanks (Given)
    4255
    Thanks (Received)
    4611
    Likes (Given)
    1438
    Likes (Received)
    1105
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Lot of that two-tier justice system going around lately.

    If the Supreme Court kicks it back to the lower courts for clarifications that drag out past the election, Trump gets what he wants provided he wins in Nov. He's got a LOT riding on that bet.
    Which I think happens to be a just result in this case given the politicization of it all.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  7. Thanks Kathianne, Gunny thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums