
Originally Posted by
Kathianne
Caveat emptor applies to everything available or choices you make.
If I choose to drink a gallon of water every hour for foreseeable time, likely I'll be in medical emergency condition pretty dang quickly, including possible brain damage. That doesn't negate the body needs water to survive, quite a bit in fact for maximum performance. Got to know what science says about needs, performance, activities, etc.
waters been used for thousands of years. seems we've got a great scientific record with that correct?
We know how much is a problem and in what ways.
Some people have died from 1 vaccine. Can we say why one person has and another hasn't BEFORE we give them the shots?
Be good if studies were done to find out who are more susceptible & the true the effectiveness and the cross effects of them all.
Rather than taking it on faith that it's good for us in general ... like water.
Ivermectin and Hydrochorliquine are scientific interventions. I was ready to take those. They've been on the market for decades. Ivermectin been shown to be safer than Tylenol. But it was blocked by "science" for use.
Science should be honest and open about ALL the options available and ALL the Pros & Cons.
And people given their God given choice of what to do.
With our food, should folks be able to modify ALL our basic food & simply TELL US it's "safe" without decades of animal testing.
Is that to much of a request?
And yes Caner treatments are poisons, But notice they don't lie or gaslight about that.
And people have the choice & know what the risk are going in.
That's all folks are really asking for.
Last edited by revelarts; 08-10-2024 at 11:09 AM.
It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God. 1 Peter 2:16