Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    50,704
    Thanks (Given)
    36898
    Thanks (Received)
    28648
    Likes (Given)
    3800
    Likes (Received)
    11852
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    15
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475564

    Default Opinion: In Kursk, the Ukrainian invasion is back

    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    50,704
    Thanks (Given)
    36898
    Thanks (Received)
    28648
    Likes (Given)
    3800
    Likes (Received)
    11852
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    15
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475564

    Default

    I can't figure out Putin's math. He didn't have enough people to fully occupy Russia before he started his wars, and the Russian population is in decline. So far, he's lost 800k troops in Ukraine and resorted to merc-ing North Koreans.

    I'm not seeing where what he is doing is in the best interest of Russia, not to mention anyone else. Who's going to be left to enjoy any gains Russia might make? And who is going to be left to support and defend Russia?

    If NATO had any balls and the ability to jam Russia's nukes (not impossible), now would be a perfect time to go after Russia. They're barely beating a non-nuclear, ragtag conventional army.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. Thanks fj1200 thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums