Scoundrel
Muslims sue to stone women
A town in Quebec has passed a measure that bans stoning or burning women, or forcing them to wear head coverings. In response, Muslims are suing to have the measure overturned. Muslims don't need IEDs to defeat us, PC is working just fine.
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazett...24f3e6&k=87787
Hahaha! LULzzzzz
These people are savages.Originally Posted by Hobbit
*****************
Not burning women alive or stoning them seems pretty reasonable to me. I like those rules.Yesterday, Premier Jean Charest, reacting to Drouin's latest sortie, said the furor has gone too far and is provoking dangerous excesses in the current debate in the province over what accommodations for immigrants are reasonable in Quebec society.
Optimistically Agnostic
You would, woman.
Hahaha! LULzzzzz
Haha.You would, woman.
*****************
Are you implying that women SHOULD be stoned? or burned alive???? Are you implying that women overreact, and because of their emotions, are UNABLE to REASON???? I thought you were one of the sensitive ones, Clay!You would, woman.
:jim hasn't installed the crying smiley, but it would be here if he had:
Optimistically Agnostic
Don't forget "talks too much"Are you implying that women SHOULD be stoned? or burned alive???? Are you implying that women overreact, and because of their emotions, are UNABLE to REASON???? I thought you were one of the sensitive ones, Clay!
:jim hasn't installed the crying smiley, but it would be here if he had:
Enemy of the State
After they lose in court they begin the rioting. Then the demands for autnomy. Dearborn is next.
When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.
You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.
Banned
You get to the part where it said there isn't a single Muslim in the town?
When was the last time someone tried to stone someone in Canada?
You think if the Muslim League sues it will be for the right to stone women or the right to wear headscarves?
It's a racist measure intended to send a racist message.
By the by, the thread title doesn't accurately reflect the article. Kinda tacky.
Last edited by jillian; 02-07-2007 at 04:56 PM.
Hahaha! LULzzzzz
Headscarves are ugly
Banned
Well, I wouldn't wear one.
Tatooing one's face is ugly, too. No laws against ugly, though.
Smitten Senior Admin
France may not be in the pickle it is today, if it had taken some preventative measures long ago.
.
People have a right to the law, but any lawyer that takes this case who does not believe as these idiots do is a legal whore.
Seriously, a criminal lawyer defends "after" the fact and is there to ensure constitutional rights are provided. But to argue that one should be able to commit deadly bodily harm BEFORE is ludicrious and has no foundation in law.
Muslims....
Banned
Again. Where does it say they intend to sue for the right to stone anyone? That was the garbage put in the law in this little town that's never seen a Muslim. Like I said earlier. If they sue for anything, it's the right to wear headcoverings... assuming they decide to bother.
I love watching the spin....
.
You're right, the article in the link did not say they were suing. Don't read every link, thanks for drawing my attention to it.Again. Where does it say they intend to sue for the right to stone anyone? That was the garbage put in the law in this little town that's never seen a Muslim. Like I said earlier. If they sue for anything, it's the right to wear headcoverings... assuming they decide to bother.
I love watching the spin....
Whats up with the link and title to this thread?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote